<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>دانشگاه تربیت مدرس</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>جستارهای زبانی</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2322-3081</Issn>
				<Volume></Volume>
				<Issue>مقالات آماده انتشار</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2025</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>16</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Evaluating the Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence Techniques and Computational Theories in the Authorship Attribution of Arabic Texts</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Evaluating the Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence Techniques and Computational Theories in the Authorship Attribution of Arabic Texts</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage></FirstPage>
			<LastPage></LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">23990</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.48311/lrr.2025.23990</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>سمیه</FirstName>
					<LastName>مدیری</LastName>
<Affiliation>دکتری زبان و ادبیات عربی، دانشگاه خوارزمی</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>عیسی</FirstName>
					<LastName>متقی زاده</LastName>
<Affiliation>استاد گروه زبان و ادبیات عربی دانشگاه تربیت مدرس</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0009-0005-2732-5774</Identifier>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2025</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>16</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Authorship Attribution is an application of stylometry that assigns authors to anonymous texts based on writing features. Several models have been developed for languages, such as English, Chinese, and Dutch. Although many studies address authorship attribution in Arabic, most of them do not critically assess whether the applied theories and techniques fit Arabic’s unique linguistic features. This study aims to identify the most suitable techniques for Arabic authorship attribution by evaluating computational theories and artificial intelligence methods. Using a descriptive-analytical methodology, it reviews and compares empirical studies on Arabic texts, including literary and online materials. Data were collected from published studies, experiments, and corpora applying authorship attribution to Arabic, focusing on method effectiveness relative to Arabic’s structural features. Results show that among computational theories, only the K equation reliably determines Arabic text authorship. Among AI’s Machine Learning methods, SVM outperforms KNN, AdaBoost, and Naïve Bayes, but the master-slave technique performs significantly better. In NLP approaches, ARBERT and AraELECTRA achieve up to 96% accuracy, with POS tagging outperforming LSA. Further research is needed to determine the most accurate technique for Arabic authorship attribution.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Authorship Attribution is an application of stylometry that assigns authors to anonymous texts based on writing features. Several models have been developed for languages, such as English, Chinese, and Dutch. Although many studies address authorship attribution in Arabic, most of them do not critically assess whether the applied theories and techniques fit Arabic’s unique linguistic features. This study aims to identify the most suitable techniques for Arabic authorship attribution by evaluating computational theories and artificial intelligence methods. Using a descriptive-analytical methodology, it reviews and compares empirical studies on Arabic texts, including literary and online materials. Data were collected from published studies, experiments, and corpora applying authorship attribution to Arabic, focusing on method effectiveness relative to Arabic’s structural features. Results show that among computational theories, only the K equation reliably determines Arabic text authorship. Among AI’s Machine Learning methods, SVM outperforms KNN, AdaBoost, and Naïve Bayes, but the master-slave technique performs significantly better. In NLP approaches, ARBERT and AraELECTRA achieve up to 96% accuracy, with POS tagging outperforming LSA. Further research is needed to determine the most accurate technique for Arabic authorship attribution.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Authorship Attribution (AA)</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Computational Theory</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Artificial Intelligence (AI) Technique</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Arabic Text</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
