The Functions of Derivational Prefixes of Semnani Light Verbs in Representation of Semantic Islands Based on Cognitive Approach: the Interface between Morphology and Semantics

Authors
E. Reza pour 1
M. Pishgoo 2
1 Assistant Professor in Linguistics, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran
2 M.A. student in General Linguistics, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran
Abstract
Semnani is one of the genuine Iranian dialects which has many different features of ancient Iranian languages. The morphological system of Semnani language plays an important role in encoding and the representation of meaning. Light verbs of Semnani have various derivational prefixes. Each of these derivational prefixes has an important role in representation of meaning. The main questions of this research are: What are the functions of derivational prefixes in representing Semantic space of light verb constructions in Semnani language? Can derivational prefixes differentiate meaning in inner level of each light verb? What is the relationship between derivational prefixes and semantic islands of light verbs? The compound verbs in Semnani language have been made of two morphological mechanism, combination and incorporation. According to the semantic space of construction grammar, as a theoretical foundation of this research, and the study of semantic space in this theory, the researchers have investigated the textual corpuses which includes some books in Semnani language, the spoken text of 50 Semnani speakers and a glossary of Semnani dialect(Javaheri and PajumSharia’ti, 1387). They found that Semnani consists of 335 light verbs. It also shows that token frequency of light verbs Kerd-iyún, Hā-kerd-iyún, Vā-kerd-iyún, Bū-kkūwāt-iyún and B(e)-et-iyún in order are 989, 433, 139, 312 and 229 items. So, the most productive light verb is Kerd-iyún. The method of this research is descriptive-analytical and corpus-based that consists of the glossary of Semnani dialect (Javaheri and PajumSharia’ti, 1387), the book Semani Vaja, authored by Khalesi (1388), Peke Poor written by Andalib Semnani(1388), Learning Semnani Dialect authored by Pajum Sharia’ti and Khalesi (1392) and the spoken texts of 50 Semnani speakers. Compound verbs that included Kerd-iyún, Bū-kkūwāt-iyún and B(e)-et-iyún have been extracted. No verbal items in compound verbs play a vital role in the formation of semantic space of light verbs. The result shows that compound verbs in Semnani language have special structures which consist of a non-verbal part and a light verb. Each light verb in this language has a derivational prefix. Every formal change in the structure would cause a change in the meaning. So, in Semnani language a change in derivational prefix of compound verbs would be followed by a change in the meaning of light verbs. As a result a derivational prefix in a light verb is a variant and the formation of a semantic island is in the hand of this prefix. The result also shows that derivational prefixes in Semnani light verbs indicate the semantic difference in each of light verbs and there is a direct relation between the semantic island of light verbs and derivational prefixes. In other words, each of derivational prefixes of light verbs indicates a special semantic island in the semantic space of each of light verbs. Indeed, there is a direct relation between the morphology and semantics in Semnani language. The main purpose of present research is to investigate the functions of derivational prefixes of light verbs such as Kerdiyn, Betiyn and Bukkuwatiyun in Semnani language.

Keywords

  • پژوم شریعتی، پرویز و عبدالمحمد خالصی (1392). آموزش گویش سمنانی. سمنان: دانشگاه سمنان.

  • جواهری، محمدحسن و پرویز پژوم شریعتی (1387). واژه­نامۀ گویش باستانی سمنانی. 2 ج. سمنان: آبرخ.

  • جوکار‌ شهرستانی، سارا (1392). فرآیندهای واژ- واجی در سمنانی. پایان‌نامۀ کارشناسی ارشد زبان‌شناسی. دانشگاه سمنان.

  • حشمتی ‌رضوی، نرگس (1389). «ویژگی‌های صرفی مشترک در گویش سمنانی، سرخه‌ای و افتری». مجموعه­مقالات همایش بین‌المللی گویش‌های کویری ایران. صص 823-832 .

  • خالصی، عبدالمحمد (1388). سمنی واجا (گفتار سمنانی). سمنان: آبرخ.

  • داوری، شادی (1389). «ساخت ملکی در گویش سمنانی: براساس دیدگاه رده­شناسی جزء­گرا. مجموعه­مقالات همایش بین­المللی گویش­های کویری ایران. سمنان: دانشگاه سمنان. صص 1015-1040.

  • دبیرمقدم، محمد (1388). پژوهش­های زبان­شناختی فارسی. تهران: مرکز نشر دانشگاهی.

  • سراج، فرشته (1387). بررسی جنسیت و بازتاب آن و حالت­های فاعلی و مفعولی در گویش سمنانی. پایان­نامۀ کارشناسی ارشد زبان­شناسی همگانی. تهران: دانشگاه پیام­نور.

  • صفایی، علی و لیلا درویشعلی­پورآستانه (1389). « بررسی وجوه مشابهت‌های زبانی بین گویش سمنانی و گیلکی». مجموعه­مقالات همایش بین‌المللی گویش‌های کویری ایران. صص 1379-1396.

  • عموزاده، محمد و بهرامی، فاطمه (1391). «ساخت افعال سبک براساس زبان­شناسی شناختی». پژوهش­های زبان و ادبیات تطبیقی. دورۀ 3. ش 4 ( 12). صص 169-191.

  • عندلیب سمنانی، خسرو (1388). پلکه پور(هله هوله). سمنان: آبرخ.

  • کریمی دوستان، غلامحسین و روحی بایگی، زهرا (آمادۀ انتشار). «بررسی چندمعنایی فعل سبک «زدن» از دیدگاه شناختی». جستارهای زبانی.

  • کلباسی، ایران (1384). «ویژگی­های کهن زبانی در گویش سمنانی». مجموعه­مقالات گویش سمنانی به کوشش عصمت اسماعیلی و مصطفی جباری. سمنان: دانشگاه سمنان. صص 297-302.

  • محمد ابراهیمی، زینب و همکاران (1389). «بررسی جنس دستوری در گویش سمنانی». مجموعه­مقالات همایش بین‌المللی گویش‌های کویری ایران. صص 1849-1876.

  • مرادی، ابراهیم و غلامحسین کریمی دوستان  (1392). «بررسی معنایی فعل مرکب در زبان فارسی»". نشریۀ ادب و زبان دانشکدۀ ادبیات و علوم انسانی دانشگاه شهید باهنر کرمان. س 16. ش 33. صص 305-325.

  • مرادی، سهیلا (1392). فعل در گویش سمنانی. پایان­نامۀ کارشناسی ارشد زبان­شناسی همگانی. سمنان: دانشگاه سمنان.

  • منصوری، مهرزاد (1392). «فعل سبک در افعال مرکب فارسی». مطالعات زبان و گویش­های غرب ایران. س 1. ش 1و صص 79-106.


 



  • Amouzadeh, M. & F. Bahrami (2012). “Light verb construction based on cognitive linguistics.” Journal of Language and Comparative Literature Researches. Vol. 3, No. 4 (Tome 12). Pp. 169-191.[In Persian].

  • Andalib Semnani, KH. (2009). Pelke Poor (Junk food). Semnan: Abrokh Press [In Persian].

  • Besedina, N. (2012). “Evaluation through morphology: A cognitive perspective”.  Selected Papers from UK-CLA Meetings .Vol 1. Pp. 177 – 192.

  • Binnick, R.I. (1991). Time and the Verb: A Guide to Tense and Aspect. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Brugman, C. (2001). “Light verbs and polysemy”. Language Sciences. 23(4).Pp. 551-578.

  • Croft, W. (2007). “Construction grammar”. In Geeraerts, D. & Cuyckens, H. (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford University Press.

  • Croft, W. & Cruse, A. (2004). Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Dabir-Moghaddam, M. (2009). Studies in Persian Linguistics. Iran University Press.[In Persian].

  • Davari, SH. (2010). “Possessive construction in Semnani dialect based on individualizing typology”. Papers of the First International Conference on Iran’s Desert area Dialects.Pp. 1015-1040.[In Persian].

  • Family, N. (2006). Explorations of Semantic Space: the Case of Light Verb Constructions in Persian. Ph.D dissertation in Paris:EHSS.

  • Fillmore, C.; P. Kay & M.C. O'Connor, (1988). “Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone”. Language 64. Pp. 501-538.

  • Goldberg, A. (1995). Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.

  • Heshmati- Rasavi, N. (2010). “ morphophonemics in Semnani , Sorkhe’I & aftari dialects.Papers of the First International Conference on Iran’s Desert Area Dialects.Pp. 823-832.[In Persian].

  • Hopper, P. (1991). “ Dispersed verbal predicates in vernacular written English”. In: Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley Linguistics Society, Berkeley, CA. Pp. 402-413.

  • Javaheri, M. H. & P. Pazum Shariati (2008). A Glossary of Ancient Semnani Dialect. Semnan: Abrokh Press [In Persian].

  • Jokar- Shahrestani, S. (2013). Morphophonemics in Semnani. M. A. thesis, Semnan university .[In Persian].

  • Kalbasi, I. (2005). “Linguistic ancient properties of Semnani dialect.” Papers of Semnani Dialectcollected by Dr. Esmat Esmaili & Dr. Mustafa Jabbari,Semnan, Semnan University, pp. 297-302. [In Persian].

  • Karimi-Doostan, GH. & Z. Roohi Baygi (2016). “A cognitive study of light verb poleysemy: The case of  ZADAN.” Journal of Linguistic Researches, Vol. 7, No. 3 (Tome 31). Pp. 129-148.[In Persian].

  • Khalesi, A. (2009). Samani Vaja (Semnani speech). Semnan: Abrokh Press.[In Persian].

  • Lieber, R. (2004). Morphology and lexical semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Mansouri, M. (2013). “Light verb in Persian complex predicates”. Journal of Language and Dialects Studies of Western Iran. 1, No. 1.Pp. 79-106[In Persian].

  • Mohammad- Ebrahimi, Z. et. al. (2010). “The study of grammatical gender in Semnani dialect”.Papers of the First International Conference on Iran’s Desert Area Dialects. Pp. 1849-1876. [In Persian].

  • Mohammad, J. & S. Karimi (1992). “Light verbs are taking over complex verbs in Persian”. Proceeding of WECOL. Pp. 195-212.

  • Moradi, E. & GH. Karimi-Doostan, (2013). “A semantic study of complex predicate in Persian language.” Journal of Literature and Language, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman. Vol. 16, No. 33. Pp. 305-325[In Persian].

  • Moradi, S. (2013). Verb in Semnani Dialect. M. A. thesis, Semnan University .[In Persian].

  • Pajum Shariati, P. & A. Khalesi (2013). A course in Semnani Dialect. Semnan: Semnan University, Semnan University Press.[In Persian].

  • Safaei, A. & Darvishali- Poorastaneh, L.(2010). “The study of linguistic similarities between Semnani & Gilaki dialects”. Papers of the First International Conference on Iran’s Desert Area Dialects. Pp. 1379-1396 .[In Persian].

  • Seraj, F. (2008). The Study of Gender, its Representation & Nominative and accusative cases in Semnani Dialect. M. A. thesis in Linguistics, Tehran: Payame- Noor  University.[In Persian].

  • Talmy, L. (1985). “Force dynamics in language and thought”. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago. Pp. 293-337.


 

Language Related Research
Volume 8, Issue 6
January and February 2017
Pages 103-136