Faculty Member, the Head of Persian Literature and Foreign Languages Department – Payame Nour University- Tehran – Iran.
Abstract
Narrative structures and elements are main fields to express and reflect the cultural underlying structure of civilizations and recreation of such underlying structure in the form of narrations counts as the important elements of linguistics and semiotics. These narrations, reflect different social and cultural status and express the human thoughts and experiences. So, exploring such narrations is considered a method to access dominant discourse of every society and explain its hidden thoughts. Many narratives include stories and pictures of animals which have had human position in the past and have changed the border between human and animal. Horse had been the subject of mythical narrations in different nations due to its unique specifications such as intelligence, adroit, loyalty and chastity. By adopting the theoretical framework of semiotics of discourse, this research tries to study the status and role of horse in civilizations of China, Japan and Iran to show what structures or process on the basis of horse mythical function are formed and how horse functions in forming and developing these narrations. Narrative analysis of the texts either abstract or concrete shows that there is a kind of semiotic fluctuation which changes horse from an animal and terrestrial creature to an enhanced and holy creature and implicates that how narrations relying on horse as mythical creature and enunciation function of horse are influenced by these fluctuations. The main aim of this research was to study discourse systems on the basis of horse narration function in Chinese, Japanese and Iranian civilizations to answer this question that how and on the basis of which criteria it can be accounted for better understand its status in improving physical and spiritual competence. Accordingly, this study presented at first the review of related literature alongside the investigation of the actional and stative system of the subject.Finally the results showed different kind of horses with diverse axiological features . Furthermore findings of the current study included two different economical and ethical aspects.
دادور، ابوالقاسم و مهتاب مبینی (1388).. جانوران ترکیبی در هنر ایران باستان. تهران: دانشگاه الزهرا.
رسمی، عاتکه (1391). «از اسب بالدار افلاطون تا طوطیجان مولانا». زبان و ادب فارسی.دورۀ 65. ش 225. صص 45-65.
روتون، کنتنولز (1387). اسطوره. ترجمۀ ابوالقاسم اسماعیلپور. تهران: نشر مرکز.
سجادیراد، سیده صدیقه و سید کریم سجادیراد (1392).. «بررسی اهمیت اسب در اساطیر ایران و سایر ملل و بازتاب آن در شاهنامۀ فردوسی». پژوهشنامۀ ادب حماسی. دورۀ 9. ش 16. صص 99-128.
سجودی، فرزان (1382). نشانهشناسی کاربردی. چ 2. تهران: قصه.
شعیری، حمیدرضا (1385). تجزیه و تحلیل نشانهمعناشناسی گفتمان. تهران: سمت.
قائمی فرزاد و محمد جعفر یاحقی (1388). «اسب؛ پرتکرارترین نمادینۀ جانوری در شاهنامه و نقش آن در تکامل الگوی قهرمانی». فصلنامه زبان و ادب پارسی. ش 42. صص 9-26.
طغیانی، احسان و طیبه جعفری (1388). «رویکردی اساطیری و روانشناختی به تولد نمادین شبدیز در خسرو و شیرین نظامی». بوستان ادب. ش 1. صص 119-134.
هال، جیمز (1390). فرهنگنگاری نمادها در غرب و شرق. ترجمۀ رقیه بهزادی. تهران: فرهنگ معاصر.
Roland B. (1966). “Introduction à l'analyse structurale des récits”, Communications, 8(1). Pp. 1–27, translated as “Introduction to the Structural Analysis of Narratives” In: Roland Barthes, Image–Music–Text, essays selected and translated by Stephen Heath, New York 1977.Pp. 79–124.
Abazari, Y. (1998). “Roland Barthes, myth and cultural studies”. Arghanoon. Vol. 18. Pp. 137- 157. [In Persian].
Ahmadkhani, M.R. (2013). Semiotics: Language and Art. Tehran: Goman. [In Persian].
Barthes, R. (2001). Myth in Current Age. Translated by: Yousef Abadi. Tehran: Arqanoon. [In Persian].
Bern, L. et al (2008). World of Myths. Translated by: Abbas Mokhber. Tehran: Markaz. [In Persian].
Chih-yi, P.-Ch. (1943). The Good-Luck Horse. Whittlesey House.
Christie, T. (2005). Chinese Mythology. Translated by: Jallal Farokhi. Tehran: Asatir. [In Persian].
Dadvar, A. & M. Mobini (2009) Compound Beasts in Ancient Iran Art. Tehran Alzahra University. [In Persian].
Frazer, J. G. (2004). The Golden Bough. Translated by: Kazem Firouzmand. Tehran: Agah. [In Persian].
Ghaemi, F. & M. J. Yahaghi (2009). “The horse; the most full repeated symbol of beast in Shahnameh and its role in evolution of the championship pattern”. Quarterly of Persian Language and Literature. No. 42. 9-26. [In Persian].
Ghirshman, R. (1992). Persian Art, Median and Achaemenid Dynasties. Translated by: Eisa Behnam. Tehran: Ministry of Culture and Higher Education. [In Persian].
Hall, J. (2011). Culture of Symbols in West and Este. Translated by: Roghayeh Behzadi. Tehran: Farhang Moaser. [In Persian].
Nasihat, N. et. al. (2013). “Semiotic analysis of “Leqa-on fi Lazate Rahil” Short Story. Language Related Research. Vol.4, No.2. [In Persian].
Piggott, J. (1994). Japanese mythology. Translated by: Jallal Farokhi. Tehran: Golshan.[In Persian].
Rasmi, A. (2012). From Plato Pegasus to Molana Dear Parrot. Persian language and literature. Vol. 65(255). Pp. 45-65. [In Persian].
Roberts, J.(2010). Japanese Mythology A to Z. New York: Chelsea House.
Roland, B. (1966). “Introduction to the structural analysis of narratives”. In: Roland Barthes, Image–Music–Text, essays selected and translated by Stephen Heath, New York 1977. Pp. 79–124. [In French].
Sajadi raad, S. & S. K. Sajadi Raad (2013). “The Importance of Horse in Iran and other nation’s myths and its reflection in Ferdowsi’s Shahnameh”. Epic poetry Research Journal. Vol. 9(16). Pp. 99-128. [In Persian].
Shairi, H. R. (2006). Semiotic Analysis of Discourse. Tehran: SAMT. [In Persian].
Sojoudi, F. (2003). Applied Semiology. Tehran: Qeseh. [In Persian].
Toghyani, E. & T. Jafari (2009). “Mythological and psychological approach of Shabdiz symbolic birth in Nizami’s Khosrow and Shirin”, Boostan –e-Adab. Vol. 55. Pp. 119-134. [In Persian].
Karimi Firouz Jaei,A. (2017). Exploring the Narrative Status of Horse in Chinese, Japanese and Iranian Civilizations, from the View point of Semiotics of Discourse. Language Related Research, 8(6), 327-351.
MLA
Karimi Firouz Jaei,A. . "Exploring the Narrative Status of Horse in Chinese, Japanese and Iranian Civilizations, from the View point of Semiotics of Discourse", Language Related Research, 8, 6, 2017, 327-351.
HARVARD
Karimi Firouz Jaei,A. (2017). 'Exploring the Narrative Status of Horse in Chinese, Japanese and Iranian Civilizations, from the View point of Semiotics of Discourse', Language Related Research, 8(6), pp. 327-351.
CHICAGO
A. Karimi Firouz Jaei, "Exploring the Narrative Status of Horse in Chinese, Japanese and Iranian Civilizations, from the View point of Semiotics of Discourse," Language Related Research, 8 6 (2017): 327-351,
VANCOUVER
Karimi Firouz Jaei,A. Exploring the Narrative Status of Horse in Chinese, Japanese and Iranian Civilizations, from the View point of Semiotics of Discourse. Language Related Research, 2017; 8(6): 327-351.