Constraints of Nasal [n] Presence at the Coda of Simple Verb Root After adding past affix in Persian: Optimality Theory Approach

Authors
1 Associate Professor in linguistics, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
2 MA in linguistics, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
3 M.Phil. in linguistics, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract
The goal of this research is investigation of simple verbs root in Persian Language which coronal nasal [n] is their coda. We are going to see, which kind of constraints are acted on the nasal [n] in final cluster of C0VC1C2 as the first member. In other words, in simple verbs root that [n] is coda, after adding past affix, which kind of constraints are acted on final cluster? To this end, among 397 simple verbs root, without repeat and without causative affix, 22 monosyllabic, bi syllabic and tri syllabic verbs root that their final syllable was CVn+d were investigated. The resulted constraints are: 1) the clusters which their C1 is [n] never formed with one of the cores of [u, i]; in other words, high vowels cannot be the core of a syllable by final cluster [nd]. 2) Nasal [n] doesn’t change at the end of monosyllabic roots by mid and low cores; in other words, [-high] vowels can be the core of a syllable by final cluster [nd]. 3) Blocking rule prevents producing of the existing similar outputs in a language. 4) The sonority sequencing principle (SSP) is considered in all past stem forms of verbs.

Keywords

Subjects


• Bijankhan, M. (2009). Phonology: Optimality Theory. 2nd Ed., Tehran: SAMT. [In Persian].
• Catford, J. (2004). A Practical Introduction to Phonetics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• Crystal, D. (2003). A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. 3rd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Dehkhoda, A. (1993). Persian Dictionary. Dehkhoda Press Ins. [In Persian].
• Gouskova, M. (2004). “Relational Hietarchies in Optimality Theory: The Case of Syllable Contact”. Phonology. 21(2). Pp. 201-250.
• Hyman, L. M. (1975). Phonology: Theory and Analysis. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. [In Persian].
• Jensen, J. (2004). Principle of Generative Phonology: An Introduction. Amesterdam: John Benjamin,s Publishing Co.
• Jensen, J. T. (1990). Morphology: Word Structure in Generative Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• Kambuziya, A. K. Z. & M. Zolfaghari Serish (2006). Sonority hierarchy principle in cvcc syllable of Persian. Humanities. Vol. 13(1). Pp. 107-122.
• Kambuziya, K. Z. A. & B. Hadian (2009). “Natural classes in Persian vowel”. Research in Persian Language & Literature. No.15. P.227-254. [In Persian].
• Kambuziya, K. Z. A. et. al. (2015), “Morpho-phonemic analysis of past stem in Persian”. Language Related Research. IQBQ. 6 (4).Pp. 201-228. [In Persian].
• Karampour, F. et. al. (2011), “Phonological Analysis of Modern Persian Irregular Verbs: An Optimality Approach”. Journal of Language Researches. Vol. 2. Issue 1. Pp. 51-82. [In Persian].
• Kenstowicz, M. (1994). Phonology in Generative Grammar. Cambridge: Blackwell Publisher, Ltd.
• Laver, J. (1994). Principles of Phonetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• McCarthy, J. (2002). A Thematic Guide to Optimality Theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Mirnejad, P. S. (2016). Learning Process of Different Types of Words in Persian Speaking Children: Lexical Morphology. Unprinted M. A. Thesis. Tarbiat Modares University. [In Persian].
• Prince, A. & P. Smolensky (1993). Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Cambridge: MIT Press.
• Prince, A. & P. Smolensky (2004). Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. USA &UK.
• Roca, I. (1994). Generative Phonology. London & New York: Rutledge.
• Shaghaghi, V. (2007). An Introduction to Morphology. Tehran: SAMT. [In Persian].
• Tabatabai, A. (1997). Persian Simple Verb and Word-Formation. Tehran: University Press Center. [In Persian].
• Zolfaghari Serish, M. (2004). Phonological Analysis of Consonant Clusters in Persian. Unpublished M.A Thesis, Tarbiat Modares University.