Phenomenology of the presence of the subject and the role of sensory types in the perception of the object: The semiotic study of "The story of blue" by Jean-Michel Maulpoix

Author
Z. Taghavi Fardoud
Graduated from Ph.D. in French Language and Literature, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract
Jean-Michel Maulpoix, is a poet who achieves spatial proliferation and saturation of novelty with association to "the others" and causes manifestation of anonymous elements. He disassociates from the types which one present in the operational field of presence; keeps distance from his locative self and initiates an esthetic-perceptual activity with the attendance at virtual locations. All these activities act as crucial factors to proliferate signification. The present study seeks to investigate the purports of proliferation and plurality, by phenomenology of attendance then by various esthetic types in the book "Story of Blue", by Maulpoix, in the framework of semiotics. To this end, author probes the modality of acceptance of the others" by means of esthetic types by the poet, the modality of his transmission in extended circumstance; consequently the impact of esthetic types in amplification of purports and the modality of appearance of elements before the poet. The essential purpose of the present study is to distinguish poet’s presence with the world around, and to show interactive relationship of poet’s inner and outer universe by highlighting the modality of generating these purports.

Keywords

Subjects

• Babak-Moin, M. (2014). "Apport des perspectives phénoménologiques à la lecture des discours publicitaires". Etudes de langue et littérature françaises. Université Chahid Chamran d'Ahvaz. 5/n 2, Pp 25-36.
• Barthes, R. (1964). Le Degré zéro de l'écriture, Élém. de sémiologie. Paris: Seuil.
• Diandué, B-K-P. (2013). Réflexions géocritiques sur l'œuvre d'Ahmadou Kourouma. Paris: Publibook.
• Fontanille, J. (1999). Modes du sensible et syntaxe figurative. Limoge: Pulim.
• Fontanille, J. (1999). Sémiotique et littérature : Essais de méthode. Paris: PUF.
• Giromini, F. (2003). Psychomotricité: Les concepts fondamentaux: Eléments théoriques. Paris: Université Pierre et Marie Curie.
• Greimas, A-J. (1987). De l'imperfection. Perrigueux: Pierre Fanlac.
• Greimas, A-J. & J. Fontanille (1991). Sémiotique des passions. Des états de choses aux états d'âme. Paris: Hachette.
• Husserl, E. (1950). Idées directrices pour une phénoménologie. Paris: Gallimard.
• Levinas, E. (2006). En découvrant l'existence avec Husserl et Heidegger. Paris: Vrin.
• Maulpoix, J-M. (2005). Une histoire de bleu. Paris: Gallimard.
• Mounin, G. (1970). Introd. à la sémiologie. Paris: Minuit.
• Ouellet, P. (1992). "Signification et sensation". Nouveaux actes sémiotiques. n° 20. Limoges: Pulim.
• Saussure, F. (1916). Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot & Rivages.
• Babak Moin, M. & K. Paknejad Raseki (2014). “An analysis with a systematic approach to social semiotics in the framework of Eric Landowski's four semiotic systems”. Djame’e shenasie Iran. 16/ 1. Pp. 129-147. [In Persian].
• Babak Moin, M. (2013). “The semiotic system based on adjustment ; the passage from classical semiotics toward the semiotics with phenomenological perspective” Naghde zaban va adabiate kharedji. 6/ 10. Pp. 175-190. [In Persian].
• Babak Moin, M. (2014). Meaning as a Live Experience: the Passage from Classical Semiotics to Semiotics with a Phenomenological Perspective. Tehran: Sokhan. [In Persian]
• Barthes, R. (1964). The Zero Degree of Writing. Elem. of Semiology. Paris:Seuil.
• Diandué, B-K-P. (2013). Réflexions Géocritiques sur l'œuvre d'Ahmadou Kourouma. Paris: Publibook. [In French]
• Fontanille, J. (1999). Semiotics and Literature: Method tests. Paris: PUF. [In French]
• Fontanille, J. (1999). Sensitive Modes and Figurative Syntax. Limoge: Pulim. [In French].
• Giromini, F. (2003). Psychomotricity: The Fundamental Concepts: Theoretical Elements. Paris: Pierre and Marie Curie University. [In French]
• Greimas, A-J. (1987). Imperfection. Perrigueux: Pierre Fanlac. [In French]
• Greimas, A-J. & J. Fontanille (1991). Semiotics of the Passions. From States of Things to Status of Mind. Paris: Hachette. [In French]
• Hassanzadeh Mir Ali, A. & I. Kanaani (2011), “A Study of the Pattern of Discourse Semantics in Qaisar Aminpour Poetry”. Pajhouheshaye Adabe erfani (Gohar Gouya). 5/2 (18). Pp. 115-136. [In Persian].
• Husserl, E. (1950). Guiding Ideas for a Phenomenology. Paris: Gallimard. [In French]
• Kanaani, I. et. al., (2017). "From the physical system to adaptive interaction; Semiotics of experience in "A quiet romantic" by Nader Ebrahimi. Ravayat shenasi. 1/ 2. Pp. 105-127. [In Persian]
• Kanaani, I. et. al., (2014). “Examination of the semiotic effects of light on the basis of a story from Masnavi”. Kohannameye adabe parsi. 5/ 3. Pp. 121-148. [In Persian].
• Levinas, E. (2006). Discovering Existence with Husserl and Heidegger. Paris: Vrin.
• Maulpoix, JM. (2005). A story of blue. Paris: Gallimard. [In French]
• Mounin, G. (1970). Introduction to semiology. Paris: Minuit. [In French]
• Ouellet, P. (1992). “Meaning and sensation”. New semiotic acts. No. 20. Limoges: Pulim. [In French]
• Saussure, F. (1916). Course in General Linguistics. Paris: Payot & Rivages. [In French]
• Shairi, H. R. & B. Torabi (1391). "Review the conditions of production and reception of meaning in discourse communication". Zaban Pajhouhi. 3. Pp. 23-50. [In Persian]
• Shairi, H. R. & T. Vafai (2009). A path to fluid semiotic: the cqse study of Phoenix by Nima. Tehran:Elmi-Farhangi. [In Persian]
• Shairi, H. R. (2004). "The study of the fundamental role of sensory perception in the production of meaning". Pajhouheshnameye Olume Ensani. No. 45-46. Pp. 129-146. [In Persian]
• Shairi, H. R. (2006). Semiotic Discourse Analysis. Tehran: SAMT. [In Persian].
• Shairi, H. R. (2009). “From structural semiotics to discourse semiotics". Naghde adabi. 2/ 8. Pp. 33-52. [In Persian]
• Shairi, H. R. (2009). “The theoretical foundations of discourse analysis, a semiotic approach". Farhangestane Honar. 3/ 12. Pp. 54-72. [In Persian].
• Shairi, H. R. (2016). Semiotics of Literature: The Theory and Method of Analyzing Literary Discourse. Tehran: Tarbiat Modares University. [In Persian].
• Shairi, H. R. et. al., (2013). "Semiotic analysis of rain poetry". Adab Pajhouhi. 7/ 25. Pp. 59-90. [In Persian]
• Shairi, H. R. (2007). “The relationship between semiotics and phenomenology with an analytical sample of literary-artistic discourse". Adab pajhouhi. 1/ 3. Pp. 61-81. [In Persian]
• Shiri, Gh., et. al., (2017). “Discourse functional analysis of comic in the first part of Sa'di’s Golestan; a semiotic approach ”. Language Related Research. 8/ 8. Pp. 1-28. [In Persian].
• Teimourpour, S. & M. Babakmoin (2015). “A phenomenological approach to the problem of language leakage in the works of Natalie Saraute”. Language Related Research . 7/ 3 (31). Pp. 35-53. [In Persian] .
Language Related Research
Volume 9, Issue 4 - Serial Number 46
September and October 2018
Pages 271-294