Acquiring Oral Communication Skill without Explicit Knowledge: a Neurolinguistics Approach

Document Type : مقالات علمی پژوهشی

Authors
1 Candidate in French Language Teaching- Tarbiat Modares University- Tehran-Iran
2 Associate Professor in French Language Teaching- Tarbiat Modares University- Tehran-Iran
3 Associate Professor in French Language Teaching- Tarbiat Modares University- Tehran-Iran.
4 Professor of French Language - Tarbiat Modares University- Tehran-Iran.
Abstract
The neurolinguistic approach (NLA) is a new pedagogical approach to foreign language learning conceptualized by Netten & Germain in 1997 in Canada. This pedagogical approach is based on recent researches in neurolinguistics, especially Michel Paradis’s neuro -linguistic theory of bilingualism. The NLA started to be used outside Canadian territories for teaching learning of French as a foreign language (FFL) both in institutional and academic setting starting from 2010. Before that, the NLA was used- and still is- in Canada as the basic approach of the intensive French program (FI) for young English-speaking and adolescents from 11 to 17 years old in school context. In NLA, the main principle is to develop the ability to communicate orally without learning explicit knowledge. The NLA is based on Michel Paradis’ neurolinguistics theory of bilingualism.


In NLA, priority is given to oral language development because only the frequent use of oral language can help develop implicit competence or internal grammar. Before being able to read and write in the L2, the learner must be able to speak spontaneously about the themes that affect his/her life, personal experiences, as he /she does in L1. Indeed, when a student enters school he/she has already developed an internal grammar or implicit competence to communicate verbally in L1. He/she is able to speak and communicate with others but he /she is not aware of the grammar rules that underlie his /her productions. However, when a learner begins to learn L2, he/she does not have oral skills (internal grammar). He/she must first develop his internal grammar, that is to say, the ability to address an oral theme and then be able to learn to read and write on the same theme. Thus, according to NLA, learning to speak an L2 consists in first acquiring the ability to communicate orally before knowing the explicit rules about the language


The purpose of this research is to answer 2 questions: First, how can neurolinguistics help in foreign language acquisition? And in second place, to what extant can the NLA help Iranian learners develop better oral communication skills? In order to find the answers, the authors paralleled the NLA with a current method of teaching / learning French as a Foreign Language in Iran.


The present research is based on an experimental method with a quasi-experimental design, the authors have chosen an experimental group comprising 10 beginner adults and a control group with the same characteristics. To collect the research data, the authors have used one quantitative (class video recordings observation and analysis) and one qualitative research (questionnaire) instruments.


The results showed that during class interactions the experimental group made fewer mistakes while speaking and autocorrection was higher among this group.

Keywords

Subjects


Fabbro, F., (2001). The Bilingual Brain: Cerebral Representation of Languages. Brain and Language, 79, 211–222.
Gashmardi, M.R. (2017). Cognitive Teaching: Importance of Cognitive Neuroscience in the Teaching of Foreign Languages. Recherches en Langue et Littérature Françaises. Volume 8, Issue 4. Pp. 47-70.
Germain, C. (2013). Pour une nouvelle approche de l'enseignement de la grammaire en classe de langues – Grammaire et approche neurolinguistique (ANL), Revue japonaise de didactique du français, Vol. 8, no 1, 172-187
Germain, C. (2017). L'approche neurolinguistique (ANL) Foire aux questions. Montreal: Myosotis Press.
Germain, C., Ricordel, I., & Liang, M. (2015). Évaluation de l'approche neurolinguistique (ANL) auprès d'apprenants chinois de français en première et en deuxième année
Gürel, A. (2004). Selectivity in L2-induced L1 attrition: A psycholinguistic account. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 17, 53–78.
Hecaen, H. 1968. L'aphasie. In A. Martinet (ed.), Le langage (pp. 390-414). Paris:Gallimard.
Marini, A., Tavano, A., Fabbro, F. (2008).Assessment of linguistic abilities in Italian children with Specific Language Impairment. Neuropsychologia, 46, 2816–2823.
Netten, J. & Germain, C. (2012). A new paradigm for the learning of a second or foreign language: The neurolinguistic approach. Neuroeducation, 1(1), p. 85-114.
Netten, J. & Germain, C. (2011) Impact de la conception de l’acquisition d’une langue seconde ou étrangère sur la conception de la langue et de son enseignement. Synergies Chine, 6:‎ 25-36.
Netten, J. & Germain, C (2002) Fondements d’une approche transdisciplinaire en FLE/FL2 : le français
intensif au Canada. Cahiers du Français Contemporain, no 10, coordonné par Veronica Pugibet et
Nathalie Gettliffe-Grant, 13-33 (Actes du Colloque de Lyon).
Netten, J. & Germain, C. (2001). La précision et l'aisance en langue seconde ou étrangère. Synergies Corée(1), 78-97.
Obler, L.K., & Albert, M.L. 1977. Influence of aging on recovery from aphasia in
polyglots. Brain and Language, 4: 460-463.
Paradis, M. (1994). Neurolinguistic aspects of implicit and explicit memory: Implications for bilingualism. In N. Ellis (Réd.), Implicit and explicit learning of second languages (pp. 393-419). London, England: AcademicPress.
Sharifi, Sh. (2005). The diffrences between first and second language from neurolinguistic point of view. first conference of the Iranian Linguistics Society. Allameh Tabatabai Universiy, Tehran, Iran.
Ullman, M.T., Pancheva, R., Love, T., Yee, E., Swinney, D., Hickok, G. (2005). Neural correlates of lexicon and grammar: Evidence from the production, reading, and judgment of inflection in aphasia. Brain and Language, 93, 185–238.