Statistical Evidence for Mood Functions of ‘be-’ in New Persian: A Diachronic Study

Document Type : مقالات علمی پژوهشی

Author
Assistant Professor of Linguistics, English Department, Faculty of Humanities, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran
Abstract
So far in the mood system of New Persian, the inflectional element ‘be-’ has had three grammatical roles: subjunctive marker, imperative marker, and future marker, all of which having in common the feature of unrealized occurrence of the event (as opposed to its realized occurrence for indicative mood). This investigation, based on a sampled corpus of 55 texts, selected from 10th to 20th centuries, follows the changes of these functions in New Persian diachronically. The results show that in a period of eleven centuries the frequency of ‘be-’ as a marker of subjunctive has increased three times, and as the imperative marker twice-and-half, while it has been productive in its third role (future marking) mostly in 10th to 12th centuries, and this function gradually disappeared later. Furthermore, since 19th c., ‘be-’ which was formerly used with simple verbs almost exclusively, began to be used with complex predicates as well. However, there is some amount of irregularity in the increasing frequency of ‘be-’ in the whole period, and the author attempts to explain it with such hypotheses as grammatical archaism in some texts, and the possible change of grammatical forms in the process of copying the texts



1. Introduction

A precise survey into the gradual development of grammatical markers is to follow the changes in their frequency patterns statistically, relying on the number and percentage reports. This paper attempts to fulfil this task for the marker ‘be-’ in the mood system of New Persian (from 10th century onwards). The goal the research, then, is to show the grammaticalization path of the marker and its mood functions throughout the intended period up to the present time. A restriction of the research, however, is that the source of data has been limited to written texts, even for contemporary Persian.



2. Literature Review

The first distinction in the mood systems is that of indicative vs. imperative. This distinction is morphologically shown in Persian by imperative zero agreement marking (in the singular form) as opposed to overt marking of indicatives (for the same form), and also by the indicative ‘mi-’ as opposed to ‘be-’ that its emergence is discussed in this paper.

The third distinctive form in the mood system of Persian is subjunctive which is controversial among grammarians, both in its definition and instances. Natal Khanlari (1986: 2/306-339) includes in the category all present and past subjunctives as well as some forms suffixed with ‘-i’, and excludes conditionals and optatives from the category. By contrast, Ahmadi Givi (2001) subcategorizes conditionals and optatives as subjunctive, to the exclusion of past forms with ‘-i’ as well as past progressives. On the other hand, Mazaheri et al. (2004) define the subjunctive category so broadly that it also includes forms such as ‘bayæd mi-ræft’ (he/she had to go) and ‘šayæd ræfte æst’ (he/she may have gone).



3. Methodology

The corpus of this research includes 77 thousand verbs, extracted by the author from 55 texts from 10th to 20th centuries. To the sampling purpose, five texts from each century were selected, and then, two parts of each text were adopted randomly, each one amounting to 700 verbs (1400 verbs from each text, altogether). These verbs were labelled for tense, mood, and the structure of the verb (simple, prefixed, or complex), determining whether they had ‘be-’ for mood marking or not.

This research follows the definition given for the subjunctive in Ahmadi Givi (2001), and the kinds of subjunctive included by Darzi and kwak (2015) and Ilkhanipour (2017). Accordingly, all instances of irrealis (including past progressives with ‘hæmi/mi-’, and past forms with ‘-i’) were excluded from the statistics, and all of the semantic types of present subjunctive (probability, obligation, optative, conditional, etc.) were included.



4. Results

The results show a gradual increase in the imperative and subjunctive functions of ‘be-’, while the future marking function is mostly active in 10th to 12th centuries, and disappears gradually afterwards. Also, as shown in Figure 1, the imperative marking function of ‘be-’ has always been, and still is, ahead of its subjunctive marking function.



Figure 1

Grammatical functions of ‘be-’ by century





Furthermore, the results show an imbalance with regard to the morphological structure of the verb: the verbs taking ‘be-’ before 19th century were almost exclusively of a simple root. Simple positive verbs reach a rate of 80% and 98% for subjunctives and imperatives, respectively, in 20th century. Complex verbs, however, began to take ‘be-’ increasingly in the last two centuries (19th and 20th), reaching the average rate of 28% and 30% for subjunctives and imperatives, respectively, in the last two texts of the corpus. Prefixed verbs are still very low in their rate of taking the marker.



5. Discussion

The first issue to be discussed here is that in the whole corpus there are no instances of ‘be-’ detached from the verb. This shows that from the very beginning of New Persian period, ‘be-’ is functioning as a bound morpheme, having started its grammaticalization process well before 10th century. The second observation in a holistic approach is that ‘be-’ in the territory of complex predicates is a relatively recent phenomenon, having increased since 19th century. This late development can be due to the competing nature of the elements that occupy the preverbal position (i.e. non-verbal elements, derivational prefixes, and other inflectional markers) which puts them in a complementary distributional relationship. Thirdly, the status of complex predicates in contemporary Persian can probably be explained with resort to the partial syntactic independence of non-verbal element which allows for the insertion of ‘be-’. This can be compared to derivationally prefixed verbs for which the prefix resists ‘be-’ insertion, with some exceptions that can be signs of an emerging phenomenon.



6. Conclusion

According to the statistics, ‘be-’ has been in a grammaticalization path in the whole New Persian period, being still expanding its territory in the past decades (i.e. increasing its frequency for non-simple verbs). In other words, the generality and obligatoriness of ‘be-’ for its mood functions has been increasing in the whole period under discussion, and it is still making progress

Keywords

Subjects


• احمدی گیوی، حسن (1380). دستور تاریخی فعل. تهران: قطره.
• اکبری، منوچهر و مونا ولی‌پور (1395). «نقد و تحلیل انواع وجه فعلی در فارسی». ادب فارسی. 17: 1-15.
• بهار، محمدتقی (1373). سبک‌شناسی یا تاریخ تطور نثر فارسی. تهران: امیرکبیر. چاپ هفتم.
• رضایتی کیشه‌خاله، محرم و آرزو ابراهیمی دینانی (1395). «فعل آینده در زبان‌ها و گویش‌های ایرانی». زبان فارسی و گویش‌های ایرانی. 1: 7-26.
• غلامرضایی، محمد (1377). سبک‌شناسی شعر پارسی از رودکی تا شاملو. تهران: جامی.
• ------------- (1394). سبک‌شناسی نثر پارسی از قرن چهارم تا قرن چهاردهم. تهران: سمت.
• علیائی مقدم، مهدی (1392). «مسئلۀ کهنه‌گرایی در فرهنگ‌نویسی تاریخی فارسی». فرهنگ‌نویسی (ویژه‌نامۀ نامۀ فرهنگستان). 5و6: 105-118.
• لازار، ژیلبر (1384). دستورزبان فارسی معاصر. ترجمه مهستی بحرینی. تهران: هرمس.
• ماهوتیان، شهرزاد (1378). دستورزبان فارسی از دیدگاه رده‌شناسی. ترجمه مهدی سمائی. تهران: نشر مرکز.
• مرادی، روناک (1391). «تعامل پیشوند التزامی با پیشوند نفی در کردی سورانی». پژوهش‌های زبانی. دوره3، ش1: 99-116.
• مستعلی پارسا، غلامرضا (1395). «نقد و بررسی سبک‌شناسانۀ شعر دورۀ بازگشت». متن‌پژوهی ادبی. 68: 7-39.
• مظاهری، جمشید، مرتضی هاشمی و مهدی متولی (1383). «بررسی و تحلیل وجه التزامی در دستورزبان فارسی». مجله دانشکده ادبیات دانشگاه اصفهان. دوره2، 38: 95-108.
• مفیدی، روح‌الله (1395) «شکل‌گیری ساختواژۀ نمود و وجه در فارسی نو». دستور (ویژه‌نامۀ نامۀ فرهنگستان). 12: 3-68.
• ناتل خانلری، پرویز (1362). دستورزبان فارسی. تهران: توس.
• --------- (1365). تاریخ زبان فارسی. تهران: فردوس.
• نغزگوی کهن، مهرداد (1392). «تغییرات نقشی بـ در فارسی نو از منظر دستوری‌شدگی». مجموعه مقالات نخستین همایش ملی بررسی واژه‌بست در زبان‌های ایرانی. تهران: نویسه. ص37-59.
• Bybee, Joan L. (1985). Morphology: A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
• Bybee, Joan, et al. (1994). The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
• Chambers, J. K., and Peter Trudgill (2004). Dialectology. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Darzi, Ali (2008). “Subjunctive-Negation Interaction in Persian”. Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Linguists, Korea University, Seoul. p.1684-1695.
• ----------- and Saera Kwak (2015). “Syntax and semantics of subjunctive clauses in Persian”. Lingua. 153:1-13.
• De Haan, Ferdinand (2011). “Typology, Tense, Aspect and Modality Systems”. In Song, Jae Jung, The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p.445-464.
• Ilkhanipour, Negin (2017). “On subjunctive clauses and irrealis mood in Persian”. Canadian Journal of Linguistics. 63(1):100-111.
• Palmer, F. R. (2001). Mood and Modality. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Portner, Paul (2018). Mood. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Timberlake, Alan (2007). “Aspect, Tense, Mood”. In Shopen, T. (ed), Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Volume III: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Velupillai, Viveka (2012). An Introduction to Linguistic Typology. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
• Wardhaugh, Ronald, and Janet M. Fuller (2014). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. 7th ed. Wiley-Blackwell.