The influence of Child Gender, Parent’s Job and Education, Number of Sibling and Parenting Styles on the Development of Semantics, Syntax and Word articulation Among Preschool Children

Document Type : مقالات علمی پژوهشی

Authors
H. Khanipour 1
M. Aghazamani 2
S. Nezaphatbakhsh 3
S. Tarvand 4
1 Assistant Professor of Psychology, Kharazmi university, Tehran, Iran
2 .A. in Speech Therapy School of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3 M.A in Psychology, Islamic Azad University- electronic Campus, Tehran, Iran
4 MA student in Cognitive Rehabilitation, Institute for Cognitive Science Studies, Tehran, Iran
10.29252/LRR.12.2.21
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of child gender, fathers and mother’s education and job, the number of siblings and parenting styles on language development components (semantics, syntax and word articulation). The population were normal preschool children and their parents in Karaj, Iran. Participants were 98 children and their parents which selected by convenient method. Test of language development (3 edition) administered on children and parents asked to response to demographic questionnaire and Parenting authority questionnaire. Results showed that girls compared with boys had better performance in syntactical understanding, grammatical completion and relational vocabulary. There were not significant differences between families with different number of siblings. Father’s job did not influence language performance of children, whereas mother’s job had a positive influence on the components of language development. Father and mother’s educational level had a positive effect on the syntactical understanding, grammatical completion and relational vocabulary. Furthermore, authoritative and permissive parenting style could positively predict sematic and syntax development, whereas authoritarian parenting style could negatively predict semantic and syntax development. It could argue that parental socioeconomic status (especially parent’s educational level and mother employment) and parenting styles could influence language acquisition in semantic and syntax domains. Moreover, girls outperformed boys in semantic and syntax in preschool period.






1. Introduction

There were existed variation in language development between children and factors related to child and family could facilitate or inhibit language development. Language development is affected by some structural factors like gender and some socioeconomic factors like parent’s education and job. Previous studies revealed that gender, parent’s education and job associated with individual differences in language development but it is unknown which language components (i.e. semantic, syntax or articulation of words) is more influenced by these factors. Another factor that may related with language development is sibling effect. There was controversy about the role of siblings in language development. Some theories, including the resource dilution hypothesis (Downey, 2001) and the confluence model (Jæger, 2009), have been proposed for explaining how the number of siblings may be related to language development. Another family-related factor that could explain individual differences in language development is parenting styles. The role of parenting style is more investigated as a predictor of academic achievement among school-age children, but little is known about the role of different parenting styles, including authoritative, authoritarian, and permissive parenting styles, in linguistic development components, including semantic, syntax, and word articulation.

This study aimed to investigate the influence of child gender, fathers and mother's education, and job, the number of siblings, and parenting styles on language development components (semantics, syntax, and word articulation).




Methodology


The populations were normal preschool children and their parents in Karaj, Iran. Participants were 98 children and their parents, which were selected by a convenient method. Test of language development (3 edition) administered on children and parents asked for a response to demographic questionnaire and Parenting authority questionnaire.

3. Results

Results showed that girls compared with boys had better syntactic understanding, grammatical completion, and relational vocabulary. There were no significant differences between families with different numbers of siblings. Father's job did not influence children's language performance, whereas the mother's job had a positive influence on the components of language development. Father and mother's educational level positively affected syntactic understanding, grammatical completion, and relational vocabulary.

Furthermore, authoritative and permissive parenting styles could positively predict semantic and syntax development, whereas authoritarian parenting styles could negatively predict semantic and syntax outcomes. Therefore it could argue that parental socioeconomic status (especially parent's educational level and mother employment) and parenting styles could influence language acquisition in semantic and syntax domains. Moreover, girls outperformed boys in semantic and syntax in the preschool period.



4. Discussion

This study showed that social and family-related factors more influence some aspects of language development. These components consisted of the ability to use relational vocabulary, syntactical understanding, and morphological completion. The ability to use relational vocabulary is characterized by distinguishing similarities and differences between words, understanding different concepts, and the relationship between ideas. As the findings of this study showed, the development of this language component was facilitated when parents had higher educational levels and more used authoritative parenting styles. In sum, some of the contribution that this study added to literature could be as follows: (1) Girls compared to boys had better linguistic skills in semantic and syntax domain; (2) mother’s education and job and father’s education is associated with morphological completion skill and the ability to use relational vocabulary. The children whose mothers had a job out of the home had a better score in semantic and syntax development; (3) the number of siblings does not affect the linguistic development in different domains. (4) Authoritative parenting styles, more than other parenting styles, positively affect the development of relational vocabulary, syntactic understanding, and morphological completion.



5.Conclusion

According to the findings of this study, environmental facilitation for language development, for children from families in which the mother’s job is the only household and had low education level, is better to focus on the relational vocabulary, syntax understanding, and morphological completion. It is better in a future study with a mediational model to investigate the factors which may mediate the relationship between parenting styles and language development among preschool children.

Keywords

Subjects

حسن زاده، مینایی.انطباق و هنجاریابی آزمون رشد زبان TOLD-P:3 برای کودکان فارسی زبان تهرانی.. فصلنامه کودکان استثنایی.1380؛1(2):134-119
مینایی، نیک زاد. ساختار عاملی و اعتبار نسخه فارسی پرسش نامه شیوه های فرزندپروری بامریند..‎فصلنامه خانواده پژوهش.1396؛1(13):108-91

Buri, J.R. (1991). Parental authority questionnaire. Journal of personality assessmen;57(1):pp110-9.
Bingham, G. E., Jeon, H. J., Kwon, K. A., & Lim, C. (2017). Parenting styles and home literacy opportunities: Associations with children's oral language skills. Infant and Child Development, 26(5), e2020.
Bornstein, M. H. (2005). Handbook of parenting: Volume I: Children and parenting. Psychology Press.
Buri JR. Parental authority questionnaire. Journal of personality assessment. 1991;57(1):pp110-119.
Cadime, I., Silva, C., Ribeiro, I., & Viana, F. L. (2018). Early lexical development: Do day care attendance and maternal education matter?. First Language, 38(5), pp503-519.
Downey, D. B. (2001). Number of siblings and intellectual development: The resource dilution explanation. American psychologist, pp56(6-7), 497.
Eriksson, M. (2017). The Swedish Communicative Development Inventory III: Parent reports on language in preschool children. International journal of behavioral development, 41(5), pp647-654.
Gibbons, P. (2002). Scaffolding language, scaffolding learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Gleason, J. B., & Ratner, N. B. (1989). The development of language. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
González, V. (2001). The role of socioeconomic and sociocultural factors in language minority children's development: An ecological research view. Bilingual Research Journal, 25(1-2), pp1-30.
Harris, M. (2013). Language experience and early language development: From input to uptake. Psychology Press.
Havron, N., Ramus, F., Heude, B., Forhan, A., Cristia, A., Peyre, H., & EDEN Mother-Child Cohort Study Group. (2019). The effect of older siblings on language development as a function of age difference and sex. Psychological Science, 30(9), pp1333-1343.
Hoff, E. (2006). How social contexts support and shape language development. Developmental review, 26(1), pp55-88.
Jæger, M. M. (2009). Sibship size and educational attainment. A joint test of the confluence model and the resource dilution hypothesis. Research in social stratification and mobility, 27(1), pp1-12.
Khodadady, E., & Hadizadeh, B. (2013). Parenting styles and their relationships with pre-school children’s first language proficiency. American Journal of Scientific Research, 93, pp97-107.
Kidd, E., & Arciuli, J. (2016). Individual differences in statistical learning predict children's comprehension of syntax. Child development, 87(1), pp184-193.
Kalmijn, M., & Van de Werfhorst, H. G. (2016). Sibship size and gendered resource dilution in different societal contexts. PloS one, 11(8). 10.1371/journal.pone.0160953
Lawson, D. W., & Mace, R. (2009). Trade-offs in modern parenting: a longitudinal study of sibling competition for parental care. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30(3), pp170-183.
Long, M. H. (1990). Maturational constraints on language development. Studies in second language acquisition, 12(3), pp251-285.
Lecheile, B. M., Spinrad, T. L., Xu, X., Lopez, J., & Eisenberg, N. (2020). Longitudinal relations among household chaos, SES, and effortful control in the prediction of language skills in early childhood. Developmental Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000896
Newcomer, P.L., & Hammill, D. (2019). The test of language development, TOLD5. Austin, Texas: Empiric Press.
Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1990). Sex differences in depression. Stanford University Press.
Merz, E. C., Zucker, T. A., Landry, S. H., Williams, J. M., Assel, M., Taylor, H. B., ... & Eisenberg, N. (2015). Parenting predictors of cognitive skills and emotion knowledge in socioeconomically disadvantaged preschoolers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 132, pp14-31.
Madigan, S., Prime, H., Graham, S. A., Rodrigues, M., Anderson, N., Khoury, J., & Jenkins, J. M. (2019). Parenting behavior and child language: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics, 144(4), e20183556.
Mokhtari, K., & Thompson, H. B. (2006). How problems of reading fluency and comprehension are related to difficulties in syntactic awareness skills among fifth graders. Literacy Research and Instruction, 46(1),pp 73-94.
Obradović, J., Yousafzai, A. K., Finch, J. E., & Rasheed, M. A. (2016). Maternal scaffolding and home stimulation: Key mediators of early intervention effects on children’s cognitive development. Developmental psychology, 52(9), 1409.
Peters, W. J., & Matson, J. L. (2018). Communication Disorders. In Handbook of Childhood Psychopathology and Developmental Disabilities Assessment (pp. 313-330). Springer, Cham.
Pancsofar, N., & Vernon-Feagans, L. (2006). Mother and father language input to young children: Contributions to later language development. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 27(6),pp 571-587.
Pancsofar, N., Vernon-Feagans, L., & Family Life Project Investigators. (2010). Fathers’ early contributions to children's language development in families from low-income rural communities. Early childhood research quarterly, 25(4), pp450-463.
Prime, H., Pauker, S., Plamondon, A., Perlman, M., & Jenkins, J. (2014). Sibship size, sibling cognitive sensitivity, and children’s receptive vocabulary. Pediatrics, 133(2), ppe394-e401.
Proctor, C. P., Silverman, R. D., Harring, J. R., & Montecillo, C. (2012). The role of vocabulary depth in predicting reading comprehension among English monolingual and Spanish–English bilingual children in elementary school. Reading and Writing, 25(7), pp1635-1664.
Pungello, E. P., Iruka, I. U., Dotterer, A. M., Mills-Koonce, R., & Reznick, J. S. (2009). The effects of socioeconomic status, race, and parenting on language development in early childhood. Developmental psychology, 45(2), 544.
Rescorla, L., Nyame, J., & Dias, P. (2016). Vocabulary development in European Portuguese: A replication study using the Language Development Survey. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 59(6), pp1484-1490.
Ross, C. E. (2017). Social causes of psychological distress. Routledge.
Strohschein, L., Gauthier, A. H., Campbell, R., & Kleparchuk, C. (2008). Parenting as a dynamic process: A test of the resource dilution hypothesis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70(3), pp670-683.
Vernon-Feagans, L., Garrett-Peters, P., Willoughby, M., Mills-Koonce, R., & Family Life Project Key Investigators. (2012). Chaos, poverty, and parenting: Predictors of early language development. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27(3), pp339-351.
Language Related Research
Volume 12, Issue 2 - Serial Number 62
May and June 2021
Pages 659-691