Analysis of the ode "Layali al-Manfa: The Nights of Exile" by Mohi-al-Din Fares Based on the Interactive Semantic Systems of Eric Landowski

Articles in Press

Document Type : مقالات علمی پژوهشی

Authors
P. Razmdideh 1
S. Heydari Rad 2
1 Vali-e-Asr University of Rafsanjan
2 Yazd University
Abstract
Landowski, the social semiotician, focuses on the subject of discourse and discourse,and thus introduces the concepts of presence,perception, and emotion in semiotics.The fact that enunciation is more important than enunciation provides the basis for phenomenological semiotics.The important problem of the authors of this research is that since in "adaptation"system,we see unity between subjects and "other" or that aspect of "otherness"is not only a passive object but also plays the role of a subject with dynamic interaction.It explores how the semantic process takes shape,and whether it can be argued that the relationship between the subjects is consistent with Landowski's theory of "adaptation."According to the research problem,the authors hypothesize that the perception of meaning is different according to the specific interactions between subjects in social contexts,so the perception of meaning cannot be separate from the context and field of rhetoric,but it is a function of the interaction between subjects in different discourse contexts.The present study has examined the signs of meanings in the ode "Layali al-Manfa"by Mohi-al-Din Fares.The findings indicate that the semantic system governing the discourse of the ode's "negative night"is of the adaptation system.In fact,the interactive and adaptive relationship of the sign system in this poem is such that the meanings of exile,civil war,occupiers are not predetermined and one-sided,but these meanings can be obtained only if the issue of simultaneous presence and interaction of the subject and another to be raised.At the same time,enunciator has used the Apollonian and Dionysian systems, respectively,to make the phenomenon of colonialism and nostalgia unfavorable.

Keywords

Subjects

• Dadbood, F, H, Bashirnezhad, & H. R. Shairi, (2020). Semio-Semantic Analysis of the Narration Process of the Story “One Thousand and One Nights” from Contrastive System to Adjusting System, Literary Research, Vol. 17, 89-110. [In Persian]
• Ehsani, Z., H. R, Shairi, & M. Moin, M. (2020). Semio semantic and narrative analysis of conversation of risk-taking discourse system in Hamnavaei shabane orkestre chubha. Journal of Narrative Studies, Vol. 7, 1-32.
• Fontanille, J. (1999). Semiotique et Litterature. Paris: PUF
• Landowski. E. (2005). Interaction risquees, Limoges, Pulum.
• Landowski. E. (2004). Passions sans nom. Paris: P.U.F
• Moin. M. (2013). Explaining the creation of poetic language using a system based on adaptation and restrained slips by Eric Landowski. Language and Translation Studies, No. 4, 122-133. [In Persian]
• Moin, M. (2014). Meaning as a lived experience: the transition from classical semiotics to phenomenology view. Tehran: Sokhan publications. [In Persian]
• Moin, M. (2015). The missing dimension of meaning in classical narrative semiotics: the semantic system of adaptation or dance in interaction. Scientific and cultural publication company. [In Persian]
• Moin, M. (2019). Analyzing Four Spatial Language Regimes based on Interactive and Semiotic Regimes of Eric Landowski. Language Related Research, Vol. 10, Issue 5, 49-72. [In Persian]
• Moin, M, & K. Paknezhad Rasekhi. (2016). A systematic analysis of social semiotics in the form of Eric Landowski’s four semantic systems, Sociology of Iran, No. 1, 129-147. [In Persian]
• Moin, M, & K. Paknezhad Rasekhi. (2016). Chaotic Patterns of Signification Generation Process in Intra and PreLinguistic Systems of “Adjustment”, Language Related Research, Vol. 7, Issue 7, 151-71. [In Persian]
• Shafiee, S, & H. R. Shairi. (2021). A Study of the Relationship between Narrative Structure and the Process of Value Production in Discourse Case Study: Persian and Arabic Risalat al-Tayrs, Literary Theory and Criticism, Vol. 5. Num, 10, 203-230. [In Persian]
• Shairi, H. R. (2009). From structural semiotics to discourse semiotics, Literary Criticism, Vol. 8, 33-51. [In Persian]
• Shairi, H. R. (2016). Symbolism of literature theory and method of literary discourse analysis. Tehran: Tarbiat Modares University Publications. [In Persian]
• Shairi, H. R. (2016). Discourse Resistance, Insistence and Appeasement: the Realms of Discourse and its Semiotic Functions, Iranian Journal of Sociology, Vol. 16, 110-128. [In Persian]
• Shairi, H. R. (2017). Semiotic analysis of discourse. Vol 3, Tehran: Samt publications. [In Persian]
• Shairi, H. R. et al. (2021). Destruction of anchors of action Meaning: Analysis of Shushi turbulence in literary discourse (Case study of the literary discourse system in This dog wants to take Roxana), Contemporary Persian Literature, Vol. 2, 181-205. [In Persian]
• Grimas, A. J. (2010). Lack of meaning. Translated by Hamid Reza Shairi, Tehran: Science Press.
• Nazemian, R. (2008). Contemporary poetic and prose texts (2). Tehran: Payame Nour University Publications. [In Persian]
Language Related Research

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 13 July 2025