Anderson, R. K., Boaler, J., & Dieckmann, J. A. (2018). Achieving elusive teacher change through challenging myths about learning: A blended approach. Education Sciences, 8(3), 65–98. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8030098
Ansari, D., & Coch, D. (2006). Bridges over troubled waters: Education and cognitive neuroscience. Trends in cognitive sciences, 10(4), 146–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.02.007
Aronsson, L. (2020). Reconsidering the concept of difference: A proposal to connect education and neuroscience in new ways. Policy Futures in Education, 18(2), 275–293. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210319850437
Bevan, M. T. (2014). A method of phenomenological interviewing. Qualitative Health Research, 24(1), 136–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732313519710
Butterworth, B., Varma, S., & Laurillard, D. (2011). Dyscalculia: From brain to education. Science, 332, 1049–1053. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1231022
Caine, R. N., & Caine G. (1991). Making connections: Teaching and the human brain. Banta Company.
Ching, F. N., So, W. W., Lo, S. K., & Wong, S. W. (2020). Preservice teachers’ neuroscience literacy and perceptions of neuroscience in education: Implications for teacher education. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 21(100144), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2020.100144
Coch, D. (2018). Reflections on neuroscience in teacher education. Peabody Journal of Education, 93(3), 309–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2018.1449925
Clement, N. D., & Lovat, T. (2012). Neuroscience and education: Issues and challenges for curriculum. Curriculum Inquiry, 42(4), 534–557. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467873X.2012.00602.x
Colaizzi, P. F. (1978). Psychological research as the phenomenologist views. In R. S. Valle & M. King (Eds.), Existential-phenomenological alternatives for psychology (pp. 48–71). Oxford University Press.
Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design. Choosing among five traditions. Sage. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aenj.2008.02.005
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Sage.
Dekker, S., Lee, N. C., Howard-Jones, P., & Jolles, J. (2012). Neuromyths in education: Prevalence and predictors of misconceptions among teachers. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(429), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00429
Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. http://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140
Dubinsky, J. M., Guzey, S. S., Schwartz, M. S., Roehrig, G., MacNabb, C., Schmied, A., ... & Cooper, J. L. (2019). Contributions of neuroscience knowledge to teachers and their practice. The Neuroscientist, 25(5), 394–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858419835447
Dubinsky, J. M., Roehrig, G., & Varma, S. (2013). Infusing neuroscience into teacher professional development. Educational Researcher, 42(6), 317–329. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X13499403
Ergas, O., Hadar, L. L., Albelda, N., & Levit-Binnun, N. (2018). Contemplative neuroscience as a gateway to mindfulness: findings from an educationally framed teacher learning program. Mindfulness, 9(6), 1723–1735. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-018-0913-4
Fischer, K.W. (2009). Mind, brain, and education: Building a scientific groundwork for learning and teaching. Mind, Brain and Education, 1(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-228X.2008.01048.x
Germain, C. (2018). The neurolinguistic approach (NLA) for learning and teaching foreign languages: Theory and practice. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Han, H., Soylu, F., & Anchan, D. M. (2019). Connecting levels of analysis in educational neuroscience: A review of multi-level structure of educational neuroscience with concrete examples. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 17(100113), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2019.100113
Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. Teachers College Press.
Hashimoto, K., & Van-Trao, N. (2018). Professional development of English language teachers in Asia. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315413259
Howard-Jones, P. A., Jay, T., & Galeano, L. (2020). Professional development on the science of learning and teachers' performative thinking—a pilot study. Mind, Brain, and Education, 14(3), 267–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12254
Howard-Jones, P., Varma, S., Ansari, D., Butterworth, B., De Smedt, B., Goswami, U., . . . & Thomas, M. S. C. (2016). The principles and practices of educational neuroscience: Commentary on Bowers. Psychological Review, 123(5), 620–627. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000036
Im, S. H., Cho, J. Y., Dubinsky, J. M., & Varma, S. (2018). Taking an educational psychology course improves neuroscience literacy but does not reduce belief in neuromyths. PloS One, 13(2), e0192163. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192163
Immordino-Yang, M. H., & Gotlieb, R. (2017). Embodied brains, social minds, cultural meaning: Integrating neuroscientific and educational research on social-affective development. American Educational Research Journal, Centennial Issue, 54(1), 344–367. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216669780
Macdonald, K., Germine, L., Anderson, A., Christodoulou, J., & McGrath, L. M. (2017). Dispelling the myth: Training in education or neuroscience decreases but does not eliminate beliefs in neuromyths. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(1314), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01314
McMahon, K., Yeh, C. S. H., & Etchells, P. J. (2019). The impact of a modified initial teacher education on challenging trainees' understanding of neuromyths. Mind, Brain, and Education, 13(4), 288–297. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12219
Matta, C. (2021). Neuroscience and educational practice–A critical assessment from the perspective of philosophy of science. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 53(2), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1773801
Netten, J. & C. Germain (2012). A new paradigm for the learning of a second or foreign language: The neurolinguistic approach. Neuroeducation, 1(1), 85–114. https://doi.org/10.24046/neuroed.20120101.85
Paradis, M. (2009). Declarative and procedural determinants of second languages. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1057/sibil.40
Privitera, A. J. (2021). A scoping review of research on neuroscience training for teachers. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 100157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2021.100157
Roehrig, G. H., Michlin, M., Schmitt, L., MacNabb, C., & Dubinsky, J. M. (2012). Teaching neuroscience to science teachers: Facilitating the translation of inquiry-based teaching instruction to the classroom. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 11(4), 413–424. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-04-0045
Sala, G., & Gobet, F. (2017). Does far transfer exist? Negative evidence from chess, music, and working memory training. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26, 515–520. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417712760
Schwartz, M. S., Hinesley, V., Chang, Z., Dubinsky, J. M. (2019). Neuroscience knowledge enriches pedagogical choices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 83, 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.04.002
Society for Neuroscience (2008) Neuroscience core concepts. The essential principles of neuroscience. Retrieved January 1, 2020 from http://www. sfn.org/index.aspx?pagename core_concepts
Spielgelberg, H. (1976). Doing phenomenology. The Hague, the Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7491-3
Tan, Y. S. M., & Amiel, J. J. (2019). Teachers learning to apply neuroscience to classroom instruction: case of professional development in British Columbia. Professional Development in Education, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1689522
Tan, Y. S. M., Amiel, J. J., & Yaro, K. (2019). Developing theoretical coherence in teaching and learning: case of neuroscience-framed learning study. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 8(3), 229–243. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-10-2018-0072
Timperley, H., Wilson, A., Barrar, H., & Fung, I. (2007). Teacher Professional Learning and Development. Best Evidence Synthesis iteration (BES), Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education. Available at http://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/themes/BES.
Thomas, M. S., Ansari, D., & Knowland, V. C. (2019). Annual research review: Educational neuroscience: Progress and prospects. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 60(4), 477–492. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12973
Tokuhama-Espinosa, T. (2017). The science in the art of teaching: Using Mind, Brain, and Education to dispel neuromyths and improve education. Conference Abstract: 2nd International Conference on Educational Neuroscience. https://doi.org/103389/conf.fnhum.2017.222.00001
Ullman, M. T. (2001). The declarative/procedural model of lexicon and grammar. Journal of psycholinguistic Research, 30(1), 37–69. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005204207369
Ullman, M. T. (2020). The Declarative/Procedural Model: A Neurobiologically-Motivated Theory of First and Second Language. In B. VanPatten, G. D. Keating, & S. Wulff (Eds.), Theories in Second Language Acquisition (3rd ed., pp. 128–161). Routledge.
Ullman, M. T., & Lovelett, J. T. (2018). Implications of the declarative/procedural model for improving second language learning: The role of memory enhancement techniques. Second Language Research, 34(1), 39–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658316675195
Walker, Z., Hale, J. B., Annabel Chen, S. H., & Poon, K. (2019). Brain literacy empowers educators to meet diverse learner needs. Learning: Research and Practice, 5(2), 174–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2019.1674910
Willingham, D. T., & Lloyd, J. W. (2007). How educational theories can use neuroscientific data. Mind, Brain, and Education, 1(3), 140–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-228X.2007.00014.x
Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2020). What can be learned from growth mindset controversies?. American Psychologist, 75(9), 1269–1284. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000794 PMID:33382294
Zadina, J. N. (2015). The emerging role of educational neuroscience in education reform. Psicologia Educativa, 21(2), 71–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pse.2015.08.005
Language Related Research