Acoustic Account of “R” in Turkish

Document Type : مقالات علمی پژوهشی

Authors
1 Associate Professor and Head of the Department of English language, Faculty of Humanities, Imam Khomeini International University
2 Department of Persian Language and Literature, Eastern Languages and Literature Department, Faculty of Letters, İstanbul University, Turkey. Assistant Prof.
Abstract
In languages, [r] with different manner of articulations (trill, flap, fricative, approximant) has occurred in different positions (alveolar, retroflex, velar). On the other hand, in different languages, the nature of the apical trill [r] in particular, has a great amount of variability in different phonetic contexts and may be affected and changed easily by the surrounding sounds. However, Formants’ frequencies, fundamental frequency, intensity and duration are those acoustic parameters analyzed and measured for Turkish [r] in this article. The data collected in this study show that [r] phoneme has various realizations according environment. It is realized differently depending on its position within a word. As an instance, the [r] in before and after voiced consonants, and in the intervocalic positions is approximant sound and in contrast, the manner of articulation of word-final [r] is voiceless alveolar fricative. The [r] in after and before voiceless consonants is voiced alveolar fricative. The word-initial [r] is also approximant.



1. Introduction

Turkish language is mainly spoken in Azerbaijan and Iran (Johanson, 2010). After Farsi as the official language, Turkish, with approximately 15–20 million speakers, has the most speakers in Iran (Crystal, 2010). Most of the speakers inhabit in the four provinces of the northwestern part of Iran. In the literature two striking features of Turkic morphology was presented: first, its agglutinative nature (low level of fusion, in Sapir's terminology), i.e. the fact that there is basically one-one correspondence between grammatical categories and their exponents, and second, its highly synthetic nature (high level of synthesis, again using Sapir's terminology), i.e. the fact that a given word can contain a large number of morphemes. Furthermore, the syllable structure of Turkish is consonant-vowel-consonant (consonant). That is, tautosyllabic consonant clusters with the sonority drop are acceptable. In Turkic languages, stress falls into final syllables of all parts of speech (noun, adjectives, adverbs, verbs), most of the derivational and inflectional suffixes carry stress.

Research Questions

The main research question of this study can be formulated as follows:

(1) What is the manner of articulation of [r] in Azeri Turkish language? (2) What is the first, second and third formant structures of [r]?



2. Literature Review

The theoretical framework of this study follows Behrman (2007) and Ladefoged (2006) acoustic studies on the English language [r] that underlines the reduction of F3. In other words, F3 suffers a severe drop in [r] production, that is, it reaches a level lower than 2000 Hz and approaches F2.



3. Methodology

In the study on formant measurements of [r], analysis revealed no significant effect of gender on the variables (stress pattern and syllable position), so the formant values of the male and female participants were pooled and reported one average value of F1, F2 and F3 for [r]. Formant frequency analysis was performed in Praat with its default standard settings (range of 5,000 Hz for five formants). Descriptive statistics were performed to describe mean and standard deviation values for output measures (F1, F2, F3). In this research, participants were recruited from among Turkish speakers aged 20-45 years old. There were 15 subjects including male and female. We had 480 target words for analysis. Participants were asked to read the list of carrier phrases two times.



4. Results

The results revealed that, the Turkish [r] sound has different allophones, two of which are actually trills, they are called voiced alveolar trill and voiceless alveolar trill. The latter occurs at the end of words while the former occurs at everywhere except between vowels, where [r] is a simple voiced alveolar tap. The analysis of F1 and F2 of approximant allophone showed that these formants are changed under the influences of surrounding vowels or consonants. Another important finding was that F3 suffers a severe drop in [r] production, that is, it reaches a level lower than 2000 Hz and approaches F2.

Keywords

Subjects


احمدی، عفیفه السادات و بتول علی‌نژاد (۱۳۹۶). بررسی موج چاکنایی همخوان روان /r/ در زبان فارسی. نشریه پژوهش‌های زبانشناسی تطبیقی. سال هفتم، شماره ۴۱، پاییز و زمستان 4. ۱۱۵-۱۳۳.
بی‌جن‌خان، محمود (۱۳۹۲) نظام آوایی زبان فارسی. تهران: سمت.
ثمره، یداالله. (13۸۶) آواشناسی زبان فارسی: آواها و ساخت آوایی هجاها، مرکز نشر دانشگاهی، ویرایش دوم.
شکری، مریم (۱۳۹۱) تحلیل صوت‌شناختی روان‌ها در زبان فارسی معیار. رسالۀ کارشناسی‌ارشد، دانشگاه الزهرا.
صادقی، وحید (۱۳۹۰) تنوع واجگونه‌ای /r/ در زبان فارسی: مطالعة آزمایشگاهی، مجلة انجمن زبانشناسی ایران: زبان و زبانشناسی. پائیز و زمستان ۱۰، شمارة دوم: ۱-۲۳.
مدرسی‌قوامی. گلناز (۱۳۹۴) دلایل آکوستیکی یک تحول آوایی. جشن‌نامۀ دکتر محمدرضا باطنی. تهران: فرهنگ معاصر. ۴۱۵-۴۴۵.
Barry, W. J. (1997). Another R-tickle. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 27 (1-2), 35–45.
Behrman, A. (2007). Speech and voice science, San Diego: Plural Publication.
Blaskovics, J. (1964). “R” Sessizinin Söylenişi. X. Türk Dil Kurultayında Okunan Bilimsel Bildiriler, 5–10. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Basımevi.
Boersma, Paul & David Weenink. (2021). Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer
program]. Version 6.1.08, retrieved from http://www.praat.org/.
Catford, J. C. (1977). Fundamental problems in phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Comrie, B. (1997). Turkish Phonology. In Alan S. Kaye (ed.), Phonologies of Asia and Africa, 883–98. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns.
Dhananjaya, N. et al (2012). Acoustic analysis of trill sounds. Journal of Acoustic Society of America: 131, April 2012, pages: 3141-3152.
Göksel, A. & C. Kerslake (2005). Turkish: A Comprehensive Grammar. London: Routledge.
Hagiwara, R. (1995). Acoustic Realization of American /r/ as Produced by Men and Women. Los Angeles: Working Papers in Phonetics.
Hayward, K. (2000). Experimental Phonetics, Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
Kopkallı, H. (1993). A Phonetic and Phonological Analysis of Final Devoicing in Turkish. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan.
Kornfilt, J. (1997). Turkish. London: Routledge.
Ladefoged, P. & I. Maddieson (1996). The sounds of the world’s languages. Oxford: Blackwell.
Ladefoged, P. (2006). A Course in Phonetics. Los Angeles: Thomson.
Lehiste, I. (1962). Acoustical characteristics of selected English consonants. University of Michigan: Communication Sciences Laboratory.
Lewis, G. L. (1967). Turkish Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lindau, M. (1985). The story of ‘r’. Phonetic linguistics, 34, 157–168.
Maddieson, I. (1984). Patterns of sounds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McGowan, R. S. (1992). Tongue-tip trills and vocal tract wall compliance. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91 (5), 2903–2910.
Nichols, S. (2016). An acoustic study of the Turkish rhotic. Poster presented at the 5th International Workshop on Phonetic, Phonological, Acquisitional, Sociolinguistic and Dialect-Geographic Aspects of Rhotics, Leeuwarden, Netherlands, 18–20 May.
Sole´, M. J. (2002). Assimilatory processes and aerodynamic factors. Papers in Laboratory Phonology, VII (C. Stevens, K. N. (1998). Acoustic phonetics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Yavuz, H. & A. Balcı. (2011). Turkish Phonology and Morphology (Türkçe Ses ve Biçim Bilgisi).
Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi.
Zhou, X. (2011). An MRI-Based Articulatory and acoustic Study of American Liquids /r/ and /l/. Dissertation, University of Maryland.
Zimmer, K. & O. Orgun. (2009). Turkish. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 22(1-2). 43–5.