Parya Razmdideh, Samira Heydari Rad,
Volume 0, Issue 0 (Articles accepted at the time of publication 2024)
Abstract
Landowski, the social semiotician, focuses on the subject of discourse and discourse,and thus introduces the concepts of presence,perception, and emotion in semiotics.The fact that enunciation is more important than enunciation provides the basis for phenomenological semiotics.The important problem of the authors of this research is that since in "adaptation"system,we see unity between subjects and "other" or that aspect of "otherness"is not only a passive object but also plays the role of a subject with dynamic interaction.It explores how the semantic process takes shape,and whether it can be argued that the relationship between the subjects is consistent with Landowski's theory of "adaptation."According to the research problem,the authors hypothesize that the perception of meaning is different according to the specific interactions between subjects in social contexts,so the perception of meaning cannot be separate from the context and field of rhetoric,but it is a function of the interaction between subjects in different discourse contexts.The present study has examined the signs of meanings in the ode "Layali al-Manfa"by Mohi-al-Din Fares.The findings indicate that the semantic system governing the discourse of the ode's "negative night"is of the adaptation system.In fact,the interactive and adaptive relationship of the sign system in this poem is such that the meanings of exile,civil war,occupiers are not predetermined and one-sided,but these meanings can be obtained only if the issue of simultaneous presence and interaction of the subject and another to be raised.At the same time,enunciator has used the Apollonian and Dionysian systems, respectively,to make the phenomenon of colonialism and nostalgia unfavorable.
Volume 30, Issue 4 (Winter 2024)
Abstract
Postcolonial literature is one of the new critical fields that was found in the 1950s and peaked in the late 1970s. One of the most important features of this type of literature is its focus on the colonized, which brings to mind the various manifestations of colonialism. The identity of hybrid and subaltern is one of the main concepts of post-colonial research. In his novel, Radwa Ashour's attention to the challenge between “me” and “other”, the phenomenon of hybridity and identity crisis as well as the conflict of nationals with two-way colonialism, shows the resistance of this pioneer writer against colonialism in the literary form. First of all, the main purpose of this research is to get acquainted with the author's ideology regarding post-colonial issues as well as his fictional works. The research method, criticism and analysis of Granada Trilogy written by Ashour which is based on views of two prominent theorists in the field of post-colonial literature, namely Homi Bhabha and Spivak. The article is based on the assumption that there is a two-way connection between the novel “Granada Trilogy” and post-colonial theories. Although the time gap between the events of this novel and the emergence of this theory is long, it seems that it exemplifies the principles of Homi Bhabha and Spivak. According to the research, cultural conflicts eventually lead to the emergence of a "hybrid" identity, which is in the heart of phenomena such as: "rejection", acceptance, dispersion and imitation. Therefore, in the novel, we see that following the mixing and bonding of Arabs and Gestalts and the emergence of hybrid generations, the pidgin language is spread. Citizens also do not have a fixed identity and undergo transformation according to the existing social conditions.
