Volume 16, Issue 2 (2025)
LRR 2025, 16(2): 213-251 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Sadeghi V, Mahmoodi S. Acoustic Account of “R” in Turkish. LRR 2025; 16 (2) :213-251
URL: http://lrr.modares.ac.ir/article-14-57816-en.html
URL: http://lrr.modares.ac.ir/article-14-57816-en.html
1- Associate Professor and Head of the Department of English language, Faculty of Humanities, Imam Khomeini International University
2- Department of Persian Language and Literature, Eastern Languages and Literature Department, Faculty of Letters, İstanbul University, Turkey. Assistant Prof. ,s.mahmoodi@yahoo.com
2- Department of Persian Language and Literature, Eastern Languages and Literature Department, Faculty of Letters, İstanbul University, Turkey. Assistant Prof. ,
Abstract: (3287 Views)
In languages, [r] with different manner of articulations (trill, flap, fricative, approximant) has occurred in different positions (alveolar, retroflex, velar). On the other hand, in different languages, the nature of the apical trill [r] in particular, has a great amount of variability in different phonetic contexts and may be affected and changed easily by the surrounding sounds. However, Formants’ frequencies, fundamental frequency, intensity and duration are those acoustic parameters analyzed and measured for Turkish [r] in this article. The data collected in this study show that [r] phoneme has various realizations according environment. It is realized differently depending on its position within a word. As an instance, the [r] in before and after voiced consonants, and in the intervocalic positions is approximant sound and in contrast, the manner of articulation of word-final [r] is voiceless alveolar fricative. The [r] in after and before voiceless consonants is voiced alveolar fricative. The word-initial [r] is also approximant.
1. Introduction
Turkish language is mainly spoken in Azerbaijan and Iran (Johanson, 2010). After Farsi as the official language, Turkish, with approximately 15–20 million speakers, has the most speakers in Iran (Crystal, 2010). Most of the speakers inhabit in the four provinces of the northwestern part of Iran. In the literature two striking features of Turkic morphology was presented: first, its agglutinative nature (low level of fusion, in Sapir's terminology), i.e. the fact that there is basically one-one correspondence between grammatical categories and their exponents, and second, its highly synthetic nature (high level of synthesis, again using Sapir's terminology), i.e. the fact that a given word can contain a large number of morphemes. Furthermore, the syllable structure of Turkish is consonant-vowel-consonant (consonant). That is, tautosyllabic consonant clusters with the sonority drop are acceptable. In Turkic languages, stress falls into final syllables of all parts of speech (noun, adjectives, adverbs, verbs), most of the derivational and inflectional suffixes carry stress.
Research Questions
The main research question of this study can be formulated as follows:
(1) What is the manner of articulation of [r] in Azeri Turkish language? (2) What is the first, second and third formant structures of [r]?
2. Literature Review
The theoretical framework of this study follows Behrman (2007) and Ladefoged (2006) acoustic studies on the English language [r] that underlines the reduction of F3. In other words, F3 suffers a severe drop in [r] production, that is, it reaches a level lower than 2000 Hz and approaches F2.
3. Methodology
In the study on formant measurements of [r], analysis revealed no significant effect of gender on the variables (stress pattern and syllable position), so the formant values of the male and female participants were pooled and reported one average value of F1, F2 and F3 for [r]. Formant frequency analysis was performed in Praat with its default standard settings (range of 5,000 Hz for five formants). Descriptive statistics were performed to describe mean and standard deviation values for output measures (F1, F2, F3). In this research, participants were recruited from among Turkish speakers aged 20-45 years old. There were 15 subjects including male and female. We had 480 target words for analysis. Participants were asked to read the list of carrier phrases two times.
4. Results
The results revealed that, the Turkish [r] sound has different allophones, two of which are actually trills, they are called voiced alveolar trill and voiceless alveolar trill. The latter occurs at the end of words while the former occurs at everywhere except between vowels, where [r] is a simple voiced alveolar tap. The analysis of F1 and F2 of approximant allophone showed that these formants are changed under the influences of surrounding vowels or consonants. Another important finding was that F3 suffers a severe drop in [r] production, that is, it reaches a level lower than 2000 Hz and approaches F2.
1. Introduction
Turkish language is mainly spoken in Azerbaijan and Iran (Johanson, 2010). After Farsi as the official language, Turkish, with approximately 15–20 million speakers, has the most speakers in Iran (Crystal, 2010). Most of the speakers inhabit in the four provinces of the northwestern part of Iran. In the literature two striking features of Turkic morphology was presented: first, its agglutinative nature (low level of fusion, in Sapir's terminology), i.e. the fact that there is basically one-one correspondence between grammatical categories and their exponents, and second, its highly synthetic nature (high level of synthesis, again using Sapir's terminology), i.e. the fact that a given word can contain a large number of morphemes. Furthermore, the syllable structure of Turkish is consonant-vowel-consonant (consonant). That is, tautosyllabic consonant clusters with the sonority drop are acceptable. In Turkic languages, stress falls into final syllables of all parts of speech (noun, adjectives, adverbs, verbs), most of the derivational and inflectional suffixes carry stress.
Research Questions
The main research question of this study can be formulated as follows:
(1) What is the manner of articulation of [r] in Azeri Turkish language? (2) What is the first, second and third formant structures of [r]?
2. Literature Review
The theoretical framework of this study follows Behrman (2007) and Ladefoged (2006) acoustic studies on the English language [r] that underlines the reduction of F3. In other words, F3 suffers a severe drop in [r] production, that is, it reaches a level lower than 2000 Hz and approaches F2.
3. Methodology
In the study on formant measurements of [r], analysis revealed no significant effect of gender on the variables (stress pattern and syllable position), so the formant values of the male and female participants were pooled and reported one average value of F1, F2 and F3 for [r]. Formant frequency analysis was performed in Praat with its default standard settings (range of 5,000 Hz for five formants). Descriptive statistics were performed to describe mean and standard deviation values for output measures (F1, F2, F3). In this research, participants were recruited from among Turkish speakers aged 20-45 years old. There were 15 subjects including male and female. We had 480 target words for analysis. Participants were asked to read the list of carrier phrases two times.
4. Results
The results revealed that, the Turkish [r] sound has different allophones, two of which are actually trills, they are called voiced alveolar trill and voiceless alveolar trill. The latter occurs at the end of words while the former occurs at everywhere except between vowels, where [r] is a simple voiced alveolar tap. The analysis of F1 and F2 of approximant allophone showed that these formants are changed under the influences of surrounding vowels or consonants. Another important finding was that F3 suffers a severe drop in [r] production, that is, it reaches a level lower than 2000 Hz and approaches F2.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |