From a semantic perspective, the Arabic language is an inquiry into the essentialism and nominalism of its vocabulary and structures

Document Type : Scientific Research

Author
Hamid Reza Mirhaji
Associate Professor, Department of Arabic Language and Literature, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran
10.48311/LRR/lrr.2025.89369.0
Abstract
The issue of "stability" and "change" is not limited to natural phenomena; the realm of language is also influenced by this discourse. Since the time of the Quran’s revelation, Muslims have developed a profound connection with language, making this topic a significant concern for Muslim scholars as well. The question of whether there are immutable semantic cores, or a lack thereof, can be explored from two perspectives: ontology and pragmatics. In the ontological view of language and its theoretical aspects, early Muslim scholars generally emphasized the existence of a fixed and unchangeable semantic center. Nevertheless, opposing views also emerged in this area. However, in the domain of word and structural meaning, many perspectives highlight the changeability and instability of word referents and sentence structures. Each of these two viewpoints carries its own interpretive and cultural consequences, and neglecting them can lead to specific and far-reaching implications in understanding and interpreting texts. A balanced approach in dealing with these two interpretive perspectives can mitigate the harmful effects of total dependence on either one.

Keywords
language
meaning
hard semantic cores
essentialism
nominalism
Subjects
·       Aboudah, A. K. (2016). Semantic Change between Pre-Islamic Poetry and the Language of the Holy Qur’an. Translated by Qasem Bostani. Ahvaz: Shahid Chamran University.
·       Abu Zayd, N. H. (1996). Imam al-Shafi‘i and the Establishment of the Ideology of Moderation. Cairo: Madbouli.
·       Ahmadi, B. (1999). Structure and Interpretation of the Text. Tehran: Nashr-e Markaz.
·       Ali, M. Y. (2021). The Theory of Metaphor in Ibn Taymiyyah and the Neutralization of the Dichotomy of Convention and Usage. YouTube.
·       Arabi, M. (2011). Futuhat al-Makkiyyah. Beirut: Dar al-Ma‘rifah.
·       Ardebili, M. M. (2014). A Brief Commentary on Plato’s Theory of Forms. Philosophy Now website.
·       Athir, N. (2000/1420 AH). Al-Mathal al-Sa’ir. Edited by Muhy al-Din Abdul-Hamid. Beirut: Al-Maktabah al-‘Asriyyah.
·       Azad, A. R. (2021). Understanding of Understanding. Mashhad: Tag Publishing.
·       Bakr, Y. (1970). Texts on the Jurisprudence of the Arabic Language. Beirut: Dar al-Nahda al-‘Arabiyyah.
·       Dabbagh, S. (2010). Language and the Image of the World. Tehran: Ney Publishing.
·       Dadjou, E. (2018). New Essentialism in Contemporary Philosophy of Science. Zehn (Mind), No. 74, pp. 51–82.
·       Duraid, M. (1958). Al-Ishtiqaq. Cairo: Matba‘at al-Risalah.
·       Farahidi, K. (1984). Al-‘Ayn. Baghdad: Dar al-Rashid.
·       Fares, A. (1963). As-Sahibi fi Fiqh al-Lughah wa Sunan al-‘Arab fi Kalamihā. Beirut: Badran.
·       Farzi, M. B. (2019). A Critical Review of Literalism in Understanding the Qur’an. Qom: Al-Mustafa Translation and Publication Center.·  Haji Esmaeili, M. R. (2010). A Theological Study of Ash‘arite and Mu‘tazilite Approaches to the Nature of Divine Speech. Comparative Theology, No. 2, pp. 87–102.
·       Hassan, T. (1994). The Arabic Language: Its Meaning and Structure. Casablanca: Dar al-Thaqafah.
·       Hashimi, A. (n.d.). Jawahir al-Balaghah. Beirut: Dar Ihya’ al-Turath al-‘Arabi.
·       Helal, A. (1995). Arabic: Its Features and Characteristics. Dar al-‘Ilm.
·       Hisham, J. (1986/1406 AH). Mughni al-Labīb ‘an Kutub al-A‘ārīb. Qom: Maktabat Sayyid al-Shuhadā.
·       Hosseini, A., & Saeedi Mehr, M. (2010). Aristotelian-Avicennian Essentialism and Contemporary Essentialism. Hekmat-e Sinavi (Mishkat al-Anwar), No. 43.
·       Hosseini Sistani, A. (1984/1404 AH). Al-Rafid fi ‘Ilm al-Usul. Reported by Qatifī. Qom: Office of Ayatollah Sistani.
·       Ibrahim, A. (1963). Dalālat al-Alfāz. 2nd ed. Cairo: Maktabat al-Anglo al-Misriyya.
·       Ibn ‘Ashur, M. (1984). Al-Tahrir wa al-Tanwir. Tunis: Al-Dar al-Tunisiyyah lil-Nashr.
·       Ismail, A. (1987). A Reading in the Meaning of Meaning. Al-Fusul Journal, Issues 27–28, pp. 37–45.
·       Jenni, A. (1952). Al-Khasā’is. Edited by Muhammad Ali Najjar. Beirut: Dar al-Huda for Printing and Publishing.
·       Jorjani, A. (2003). Dala’il al-I‘jaz. Beirut: Al-Maktabah al-‘Asriyyah.
·       Kafi, H. (n.d.). [Title not provided].
·       Kahler, J. (2000). Ferdinand de Saussure. Translated by Kourosh Safavi. Tehran: Hermes.
·       Kapelston, F. (2006). A History of Greek and Roman Philosophy. Translated by Mojtabavi. Tehran: Elmi-Farhangi.
·       Mojtahed Shabestari, M. (2016). What Is New Hermeneutics? and Philosophy of Language. Majtahed Shabestari Website.
·       Manqour, A. (2017). Foundations and Discussions of Semantics in the Islamic World. Translated by Hossein Seyyedi. Mashhad: Ferdowsi University Press.
·       Mirhaji, H. M. (2020). The Logic of Grammar and the Grammar of Logic. Linguistic Studies, No. 66, pp. 441–475.
·       Mofid, M. (1992/1413 AH). Al-Ikhtisas. Qom: International Conference on Shaykh al-Mufid Millennium.
·       Mohammadi Mozaffar, M. H. (2021). Literalism in the Qur’an. Qom: University of Religions and Denominations.
·       Mozaffar, M. R. (1980). Logic (Al-Mantiq). Beirut: Dar al-Ta‘aruf.
·       Mozaffar, M. R (2000). Usul al-Fiqh. Islamic Knowledge Press.
·       Malekian, M. (2023). Lecture: Essentialism. Youtube.
·       Najati, M., et al. (2021). Essentialism in Transcendent Philosophy. Kheradnameh Sadra, No. 103, pp. 13–24.
·       Noubahar, R. (2020). Usul al-Fiqh and the Semantics and Rules of Textual Interpretation. Tehran: Mizan.
·       Qur’an, The Holy.
·       Raghib (Rajiḥi), A. (1997). Chapters in Linguistics. Alexandria: Dar al-Ma‘rifah al-Jami‘iyyah.
·       Rasa’il Ikhwan al-Safa wa Khullan al-Wafa. (1984). Edited by Mustafa Ghalib. Beirut.
·       Radi al-Din, M. (n.d.). Sharh Shafiyyat Ibn al-Hajib. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.
·       Saeedi Roshan, M. B. (2024/1403 AH). Qur’anic Semantics: Methods and Theories. Qom: Research Institute of Seminary and University.
·       Samera’i, F. S. (2000). The Arabic Sentence and Meaning. Beirut: Dar Ibn Hazm.
·       Samera’i, F. S. (2007). Meanings of Syntax (Ma‘ani al-Nahw). Beirut: Arab History Foundation.
·       Samera’i, F. S. (2009/1430 AH). From the Secrets of Qur’anic Eloquence. Amman: Dar al-Fikr.
·       Sayed, A. (1999). Ilm al-Dalalah: A Theoretical and Applied Study. Cairo: Al-Nahda al-Misriyya.
·       Seyyedi, H. (2020). Linguistic Theories of Muslim Scholars. Qom: Islamic Sciences Research Institute.
·       Sibawayh, A. (1966). Al-Kitab, Vol. 1. Edited by Muhammad Harun. Cairo: Dar al-Qalam.
·       Soroush, A. (1998). Expansion of the Prophetic Experience. Tehran: Serat.
·       Soroush, A. (1999). Theoretical Contraction and Expansion of Shari‘a. Tehran: Serat.
·       Soroush, A. (2017). Religious Life in the Modern World. Session 11, Telegram Channel.
·       Soroush, A. (2025). Lecture: The Nature of the Transition from Realist Thought to Nominalist Thought. YouTube.
·       Sadr, M. B. (1980). Duroos fi ‘Ilm al-Usul: Al-Halaqat al-Ula wa al-Thaniyah. Beirut: Dar al-Kitab al-Lubnani.
·       Safavi, K. (2014). An Introduction to Literary Semiotics. Tehran: Elmi Publishing.
·       Safavi, K. (2000). An Introduction to Semantics. Tehran: Institute for Islamic Culture and Art Studies.
·       Suyuti, J. (n.d.). Al-Muzhir fi ‘Ulum al-Lughah wa Anwa‘iha. Edited by Ibrahim, Bijawi, Jad al-Mawla, & Halabi. Dar al-Fikr.
·       Suyuti, J. (n.d.). Al-Iqtirah fi ‘Ilm Usul al-Nahw. Edited and annotated by Ahmad Muhammad Qasim. Qom: Nashr Adab al-Hawzah.
·       Taftazani, S. (1353 AH). Al-Mutawwal fi Sharh Talkhis al-Miftah. Tehran: Maktabat al-‘Ilmiyyah al-Islamiyyah.
·       Tabataba’i, M. H. (n.d.). Al-Mizan, Vols. 1, 3, 19. Qom: Society of Teachers (Jame‘at al-Mudarrisin).
·       Taymiyyah, A. (n.d.). Al-Radd ‘ala al-Mantiqiyyīn, Vol. 1. Beirut: Dar al-Ma‘rifah.
·       Tayyeb, A. (2001). Guide to Understanding and Crafting Arabic Poetry. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr.
·       (Ibn ‘Ashur), M. (1984). Al-Tahrir wa al-Tanwir. Tunis: Al-Dar al-Tunisiyyah lil-Nashr.
·       Varestig, K. (2012). History of Muslim Linguistic Studies. Translated by Abolhasani. Tehran: SAMT.
·       Vaezi, A. (2013). The Hermeneutical Theory of Text Interpretation. Qom: Research Institute of Seminary and University.
·       Zajjaji, A. Q. (1959). Al-Idah. Edited by Mazin al-Mubarak. Cairo: Dar al-‘Urubah.
·       Zamakhshari, M. (n.d.). Al-Kashshaf ‘an Haqa’iq Ghawamid al-Tanzil.
·       Zarrabiha, M. A. (2005). The Language of Mysticism. Tehran: Beinadol.