Assistant Professor of Linguistics, Tarbiat Modarres University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
This paper attempts to investigate the Persian morphological system in the framework of Lexical Morphology Model (Kiparsky, 1982). The main goal of this research is to study the efficacy of the model in analyzing the Persian data. Having introduced the Lexical Morphology, some data which are counterexamples to the model at first sight, will be discussed. It will be shown that on the basis of different syntactic, semantic and cognitive criteria there is some kind of conformity between the data and the Lexical Morphology Model; although it is asserted that the efficacy of the model to analyze the English data (the language on which the model is designed) is more than its efficacy in Persian. In addition, the author suggests that in order to cope with some inadequacy that Kiparsky’s model encounters to analyze idioms (listed syntactic objects) the model should be revised by a loop connecting the syntax level to lexicon. Therefore, idioms are firstly formed in syntax, after lexicalization they will return to syntax. It seems that this loop makes the model much more efficient.
آرام، یوسف (1387). «بررسی فرایند اشتقاق در زبان ترکی آذری». مجلۀ پژوهش علوم انسانی. س 9، ش 24، صص 185-207.
آرام، یوسف (1388). اشتقاق در زبان ترکی آذری. رسالۀ دوره دکتری زبانشناسی. تهران: دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی.
رفیعی، عادل (1386). «نگاهی معنایی به عملکرد پسوندافزایی اشتقاقی و پسوندافزایی تصریفی». مجموعه مقالات هفتمین کنفرانس زباشناسی. (صص 274-287). تهران: دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی.
غلامعلیزاده، خسرو و یدالله فیضی پیرانی (1390). «بررسی لایهها و سطوح واژگانی در وندهای زبان فارسی از نگاه صرف واژگانی». مجلۀ پژوهشهای زبانشناسی. س 3، ش 2. صص 65-84.
Anderson, S. R. (1988). “Morphological theory”. In Newmeyer, F. (Ed.). Linguistic: The Cambridge Survey. Vol. 1. (pp. 146-191). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Booij, G. E. (1996). “Inherent Versus contextual inflection and the split morphology hypothesis”. In G. E. Booij & J. Van Marle (Eds.). Yearbook of Morphology. (pp. 1-16). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Chomsky, N. & M. Halle. (1968). The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.
Chomsky, N. (1970). “Remarks on Nominalization”. In Jacobs and Rosenbaum (Eds.). Readings in English Transformational Grammar. Waltham Mass: Blaidsdell.
di Sciullo, A. M. & E. Williams (1987). On Defining the Word. Massachusette: MIT Press.
Haspelmath, M. & A. D. Sims (2010). Understanding Morphology. 2nd Edition. Hodder Education.
Jensen, J. (1990). Morphology. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Katamba, F. (2006).Morphology. 2nd edition. USA: Macmillan Press Ltd.
Kiparsky, P. (1982). “Lexical Morphology and Phonology”. In Yang, I. S. (Ed.). Linguistics in Morning Calm. Seoul: Hanshin.
Newmeyer, F. (2000). Language Form and Language Function. USA: MIT Press.
Taylor, J. R. (2002). Cognitive Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bahrami-Khorshid,S. (2015). The Efficacy of Lexical Morphology Model; An Analysis on the Basis of Persian Data. Language Related Research, 6(6), 47-73.
MLA
Bahrami-Khorshid,S. . "The Efficacy of Lexical Morphology Model; An Analysis on the Basis of Persian Data", Language Related Research, 6, 6, 2015, 47-73.
HARVARD
Bahrami-Khorshid,S. (2015). 'The Efficacy of Lexical Morphology Model; An Analysis on the Basis of Persian Data', Language Related Research, 6(6), pp. 47-73.
CHICAGO
S. Bahrami-Khorshid, "The Efficacy of Lexical Morphology Model; An Analysis on the Basis of Persian Data," Language Related Research, 6 6 (2015): 47-73,
VANCOUVER
Bahrami-Khorshid,S. The Efficacy of Lexical Morphology Model; An Analysis on the Basis of Persian Data. Language Related Research, 2015; 6(6): 47-73.