1
Assistant Professor of Linguistics, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2
M.A. in Linguistics, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
This research seeks to find, which of NP and DP’s models may accurately describe the relationship between the head and its dependent(s), based on minimalism in Persian language. The method of study is descriptive-analytic. This study was performed by comparing English sources with Persian ones. The samples were selected by the intuition of the researcher in a way that aspects of differences between these two models can be shown. We contrasted the data based on two models, the traditional model which takes N as the head of the phrase and the new model in which the head of the phrase is a determiner and NP is a complement headed by “D”. By analyzing of NPs, tree diagrams were drawn by comparing the aforementioned models we concluded that DP model represent a better description of the head-dependent relations, and NP model can be replaced by the DP to draw structural relationships of sentences.
حیدری، عبدالحسین و افسر روحی (1393). «قلب نحوی در زبان ترکی آذری براساس مدل کاوشگرـهدف برنامه کمینهگرایی».جستارهای زبانی. د5. ش1 (پیاپی17). بهار. صص27-44.
دبیرمقدم، محمد (1390). زبانشناسی نظری پیدایش و تکوین دستور زایشی. چاپ پنجم، تهران: سمت.
زاهدی، کیوان (1388). «زبان، تفکر و فرهنگ: دیدگاهها و برهانها». فصلنامۀ تحقیقات فرهنگی. ش5. بهار. صص17-45.
صحرایی، رضا (1389). «گروه حرف تعریف درزبان فارسی». فصلنامۀ زبان و ادب پارسی. ش45. پاییز. صص129-157.
کوک، ویجی و مارک نیوسان (1389). دستورزبان جهانی چامسکی. ترجمۀ ابراهیم چگنی، تهران: رهنما.
معظمی، آرزو (1385). نحو گروه تعریف در زبان فارسی. پایاننامۀ دکتری رشته زبانشناسی همگانی. تهران: دانشگاه تهران
Abney, S.P. (1987). The English Noun Phrase in its Essential Aspect. Ph.D. Dissertation. MIT.
Alexiadou, A.; L. Haegeman & M. Stavrou (2007). Noun Phrase in the Generative Perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Bašić, M. (2004). Nominal Subextractions and the Structure of NPs inSerbian and English. M.A. Dissertation. University of Tromsø.
Boeckx, C. (2006). Linguistic Minimalism: Origins, Concepts, Methods, and Aims. New York: Oxford University Press Inc.
Bošković, Ž. (2005). “On the locality of left branch extraction and the structure of NP”. Studia Linguistica. 59.
Bošković, Ž. (2008). “What will you have, DP or NP?”. Proceedings ofNELS.37.
Chomsky, N. (1970). “Remarks on nominalization”. In R. Jacobs & P.Rosenbaum (Eds.). Readings In English Transformational Grammar .Pp.184-221. Mass: Ginn, Waltham.
Chomsky, N. (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge. Mass: MIT Press.
Corver, N. (1990). The Syntax of Left Branch Extractions. Dissertation. Catholic University of Brabant, Tilburg.
Culicover, P. W. & R. Jackendoff (2005). Simpler Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Despić, M. (2009). “On the structure of the Serbo-Croatian noun phrase evidencefrom Binding”. In Proceedings of the Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics. The Yale Meeting .Pp. 17-32. Ann Arbor : Michigan Slavic Publications.
Hornstein, N. J. & K. K. Grohmann (2005). Understanding Minimalist, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jakendoff, R. (1977). X-Syntax: A Study of Phrase Structure. Cambridge. Mass: MIT Press.
Progovac, L. (1998). “Determiner phrase in a language withoutdeterminers”. Journal of Linguistics 34. pp. 165-179.
Radford, A. (1997). Syntactic Theory and the Structure of English: A Minimalist Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Radford, A. (2004). English Syntax: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rutkowski, P. (2002). “Noun/Pronoun asymmetries: Evidence in support of the DP hypothesis in Polish”. Jezikoslovlie 3(1/2). Pp. 159-170.
Zlatić, L. (1997). The Structure of the Serbian Noun Phrase. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Texas at Austin.