ارائه الگوی کیفیت مدرس از دیدگاه ذینفعان در آموزش زبان انگلیسی: ایجاد پرسش‌نامه

نویسندگان
رامین اکبری 1
میلاد بهشتی پرور 2
غلامرضا کیانی 1
1 دانشیار آموزش زبان، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران
2 دانشجوی دکتری آموزش زبان انگلیسی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران
چکیده
یکی از مهم‌ترین مباحث در زمینه آموزش، وجود اطمینان از کیفیت و اثرگذاری تدریس و مدرس است؛ ازاین‌رو، لازم است الگوها و ابزارهایی برای توصیف و سنجش آن­ها ایجاد شود. یکی از دروس آموزشی که فراگیران زیادی به آن علاقه دارند، زبان انگلیسی است؛ بنابراین، ایجاد ابزار سنجش و نیز ارائه الگویی مناسب برای توصیف کیفیت تدریس و اثربخشی در این حیطه امری ضروری است. تحقیق حاضر با هدف ارائه چنین ابزار و الگویی در دو مرحله کیفی و کمّی صورت پذیرفت که نتایج مرحله کیفی به ارائه یک الگو و نیز یک پرسش‌نامه جهت سنجش آن انجامید. نتایج مرحله کیفی نشان داد الگوی کیفیت مدرس از هفت عامل/ فاکتور اصلی تشکیل شده است: 1. پیش‌شرط‌های تدریس؛ 2. مهارت­های عملی کلاسی؛ 3. مهارت‌های اجتماعی- ارتباطی؛ 4. سازمان‌دهی و برنامه­ریزی آموزش؛ 5. رشد حرفه­ای؛ 6. مهارت­های مدیریت کلاس؛ 7. مهارت­های کنترل یادگیری و رشد فراگیران. براساس این عوامل، یک پرسش‌نامه 48سؤالی طراحی شد؛ سپس در مرحله کمّی، با استفاده از روش آماری تحلیل عاملی اکتشافی و تأییدی، اعتبار، پایایی و معناداری تمام عوامل و سؤالات سازنده آن‌ها بررسی شد. براساس نتایج آماری به‌دست‌آمده می­توان هم الگوی ارائه‌شده و هم پرسش‌نامه را قابل قبول و قابل استفاده دانست. پرسش‌نامه حاصل از این مطالعه می­تواند در ارزیابی مدرسان و نیز کنترل کیفی آموزشگاه­های زبان و نیز درصورت نیاز، در مدارس استفاده شود.
کلیدواژه‌ها
آموزش زبان انگلیسی
پرسش‌نامه
مدل
‌واژگان کلیدی: کیفیت مدرس

عنوان مقاله English

Offering a Model for Teacher Quality from the Perspective of the Stakeholders in ELT

نویسندگان English

Ramin Akbari 1
milad beheshti parvar 2
Gholamreza Kiany 1
1 Associate Professor of English, Tarbiat Modarres University, Tehran, Iran
2 Ph.D. student in English Education, Tarbiat Modarres University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

One of the most important issues in the realm of education is assurance regarding the quality and effectiveness of teaching and teachers. In this regard, it is essential that models and instruments be developed in order to describe and assess them. It is one of the subjects creating a lot of interest in learners is English. Therefore, it is crucial to develop a model as well as a measuring instrument for describing quality of teachers and teaching in English. The present study was an attempt to develop such a model and instrument in a qualitative and a quantitative phase. In the qualitative phase, seven factors were identified as the underlying structure of teacher quality on which basis a 48-item questionnaire was developed. Then, in the quantitative phase, using Exploratory and Confirmatory factor Analyses, the reliability, and the validity of the model and the questionnaire were obtained. Based on the findings, both the model and the questionnaire are acceptable and valid and can be utilized.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

ELT
English Language Teaching
Questionnaire
Teacher quality
model"
مصری، ک. (1389). «آشفته‌بازار مؤسسات آموزش زبان». 1389/05/06.
Evaluating Teacher Effectiveness (2010). Emerging Trends Reflected in the State Phase 1 Race To The Top Applications. Naperville, IL: Learning Point Associates. Pp. 1-13. 
Confirmatory Factor Analysis (2013). Retrieved Augest 27, 2013. At: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmatory_factor_analysis.
Exploratory Factor Analysis (2013). Retrieved Augest 27, 2013. At: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exploratory_factor_analysis#cite_note-Norris-1.
Adams, C. & R. Pierce (2004). Characteristics of Effective Teaching: Traditions and Innovations. Teaching at Ball State University.
Anderson, D.; L. Barrow & W. Sander (2007). “Teachers and student achievement in the Chicago public high schools”. Journal of Labor Economics. 25(1). Pp. 95-135.
Babai Shishavan, H. & K. Sadeghi (2009). “Characteristics of an effective English language teacher as perceived by Iranian teachers and learners of English”. English Language Teaching. 2 (4). Pp. 130-143. Doi: 10.5539/elt.v2n4p130.
Borg, S. (2006). “The Distinctive characteristics of foreign language teachers”. Language Teaching Research. 10(1). Pp. 3-31.
Brosh, H. (1996). “Percieved characteristics of the effective language teachers”. Foreign Language Annals. 29 (2). Pp. 125-136.
Campbell, J.; L. Kyriakides; D. Muijs & W. Robinson (2006). Assessing teacher effectiveness: developing a differentiated model. Taylor & Francis e-Library.
Chen, J. (2012). “Favorable and infavorable characteristics of EFL teachers perceived by university students of Thiland”. International Journal of English Linguistics. 2(1). Pp. 213-219.
Collins, J. & N.P. O’Brien (2011). The Greenwood Dictionary of Education. 2nd Ed. Santa Barbara, California: ABC-CLIO, LLC.
Craig, H.J., R.J. Kraft & J. Du Plessis (1998). Teacher Development: Making an Impact. Washington DC: USAID.
Creemers, B.P. & L. Kyriakides (2008). The Dynamics of Educational Effectiveness. Abingdon, Oxford: Routledge.
Goe, L.; C. Bell & O. Little (2008). Approaches to Evaluating Teacher Effectiveness: A Research Synthesis. Washington, DC: National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality.
Holliday, A. (2001). Doing and Writing Qualitative Research. London: Sage Publications.
http://www.vajehyab.com/dehkhoda/کیفیت (1393/04/20). At: http://www. vajehyab .com
Hunt, B.C. (2009). Teacher effectiveness: A Review of the International Literature and its Relevance for improving Education in Latin America. Washington, DC: Partnership for Educational Revitalization in the Americas (PREAL) (Working Paper No. 43).
Javeris, P. (2005). International Dictionary of Adult and Continuing Education. Taylor & Francis e-Library.
Khodadady, E. (2010). “Factors underlying characteristics of effective English language teachers: validity and sample effect”. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics. 13(2). Pp. 47-74.
Khojastehmehr, R. & A. Takrimi (2009). “Characteristics of effective teachers: perceptions of the English teachers”. Journal of Education and Psychology. 3(2). Pp. 53-66.
Kyriacou, C. (2009). Effective Teaching in Schools. 3rd Ed. Cheltenham, United Kingdom: Nelson Thornes Ltd.
Lohithakshan, P. (2002). Dictionary of Education: A Practical Approach. Daryaganj, New Delhi: Kanishka Publishers, Distributors.
Park, G.P. & H.W. Lee (2006). “The Characteristics of effective English teachers as perceived by high school teachers and students in Korea”. Asia Pacific Education Review. 7 (2). Pp. 236-248.
Rogers, G. & E. Bouey (1996). “Collecting Your Data”in L.M. Tutty, M. Rothery & R.M. Grineell (Eds.). Qualitative Research for Social Workers: Phases, Steps, and Tasks. 4th Ed. Boston: Ally and Bacon.
Stronge, J.H. (2007). Qualities of Effective Teachers. 2nd Ed. Aelxandria, Virginia Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Toch, T. & R. Rothman (2008). Rush to judgment: teacher evaluation in public education. Education Sector Reports. Retrieved Jun 16, 2013, from www.educationsector.org/sites/default/files/publications/RushToJudgment_ES_Jan08.pdf.
Tyagi, S. & K. Vashisth (2012). “Dimensions of teaching effectiveness”. International Journal of Basic and Advanced Research. 1 (2). Pp. 30-33.
UNESCO (2004). FL Global Monitoring Report: The Quality Imperative. Paris.
Wichadee, S. (2010, July 8, 2013). “Characteristics of Effective English Language Teachers: The perspectives of Bangkok University Students”.  BU Academic Review.
جستارهای زبانی
دوره 8، شماره 1
بهار 1396
صفحه 23-47