Critical Discourse Analysis of Imam Ali's (AS) Letter to Muawiyah

Authors
A. Safayi 1
B. Soltani 2
1 Associate Professor, Department of Persian Language and Literature, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran
2 PhD Candidate in Persian Language and Literature, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran, Rasht, Iran
Abstract
The Leader's Letters have always some special features to be analyzed in the frame work of critical discourse analysis. One of the valuable letters is the 28th letter of the Imam Ali's Nahj Al-balāghe having special place among the letters of Imam Ali. In principle, this letter manifests legitimate discourse of the Imam. The main question of this article is that how is it possible to investigate the relationship among the different linguistic layers within this discourse? Furthermore, how this legitimate discourse of Imam can be shaped by these linguistic and discursive selections? And finally how it can fight with the opponent discourse (Muāwiyah)?
Our assumption is that in this letter, Imam to by perpetuating and promoting his legitimacy and combating with the opposite discourse, Imam makes specific choices of linguistic possibilities and tries to gain the attention of the audience to his policy. To explore this, this article uses the Halliday's functional grammar theoretical framework to study the Imam's letter based on three metafunctions of this approach.
These metafunctions are ideational, interpersonal and textual .The results indicated that the legitimate discourse of the Imam, in order to stabilize and promote itself against opposite discourse, spreads the concept of "Us and Them" in the letter by making appropriate and specific choices from linguistic devices particularly in the application of relational and material processes and modality. Also, the textual function enhances previous metafunctions in the way to guaranty the coherence of the discourse in terms of legitimacy.

Keywords

  • امینی، رضا. (1392). «تحولات معنایی و ساخت اطلاع «آغازگرهای اسنادی‌شده» در فرآیند ترجمه از انگلیسی به فارسی در چارچوب دستور نقش‌گرای نظام‌مند هالیدی». جستارهای زبانی. د 4. ش 4 (پیاپی 16). صص 1ـ31.

  • ایشانی، طاهره و معصومه نعمتی قزوینی. (1392). «بررسی انسجام و پیوستگی در سورۀ صف با رویکرد زبان‌شناسی نقش‌گرا». مجلۀ انجمن ایرانی زبان و ادبیات عربی. ش 27. صص 65ـ95.

  • سلطانی، سید علی‌اصغر. (1387). قدرت، گفتمان و زبان (سازکارهای جریان قدرت در جمهوری اسلامی ایران). چ 2. تهران: نشر نی.

  • طیب، محمدتقی و ابوالفضل مصفا جهرمی. (1381). «سازماندهی آغازگر در متون داستانی و غیرداستانی قرآن کریم». مجله دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی (دانشگاه اصفهان). ضمیمه ش 29 و 30. صص 17ـ30.

  • عرب زوزنی، محمدعلی و محمدرضا پهلوان‌نژاد. (1393). «بررسی ساختار آغازگری در خطبۀ جهاد نهج‌البلاغه براساس فرانقش متنی نظریه نظام‌مند نقش‌گرا». فصلنامه پژوهشنامه نهج‌البلاغه. س 2. ش 6. صص 17ـ38.

  • عرب زوزنی، محمدعلی و محمدرضا پهلوان‌نژاد. (1394). «بررسی ساختار گذرایی در خطبه بیست‌وهفتم نهج‌البلاغه براساس فرانقش تجربی نظریه نقش‌گرا». فصلنامه پژوهشنامه نهج‌البلاغه. س 3. ش 9. صص 1ـ25.

  • علی‌ابن ابی‌طالب(ع). (1379). نهج‌البلاغه. ترجمه محمد دشتی. قم: مشهور.

  • قدسی، محدثه؛ یاحقی، محمدجعفر و مه‌دخت پورخالقی چترودی. (1393). «بررسی متن نامۀ مسعود غزنوی به ارسلان‌خان در تاریخ بیهقی با روش تحلیل گفتمان انتقادی». جستارهای ادبی. ش 184. صص 71ـ101.



  • Boolr, T. & M. Bloor (1997). The Functional Analysis of English: A Hallidayan Approach. 2-nd edition, New York: Arnold.

  • Burton, D. (1982). “Through glass darkly: Through dark glasses”. In R. Carter (Ed.), Language and Literature: An Introductory Reader in Stylistics (Pp. 194–214).

  • Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.

  • Halliday, M.A.K & Ch. Matthiessen (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 3rd edition, London: Edward Arnold Publishers Ltd.

  • Halliday, M.A.K. (1971). “Linguistic function and literary style: An inquiry into the language of William Golding’s the inheritors”. In Chatman, S (Ed.), Literary Style: A symposium (Pp.330-365). New York: Oxford University.

  • Halliday, M.A.K. (1976). “Modality and Modulation”. In G.R. Kress (Ed.). Halliday: System and Function in Language−Selected Papers (Pp. 189-230). London: Oxford University Press.

  • Halliday, M.A.K. (1981). Explorations in the Function of Language. London: Edward Arnold.

  • Halliday, M.A.K. (1985). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.

  • Matthiessen, C.M.I.M. (1993). “Register in the round: diversity in a unified theory of register analysis”. In: M. Ghadessy (Ed.). Register analysis. Theory and practice. London: Pinter.Pp. 221-292.

  • Mills, S. (1995). Feminist Stylistics. London: Routledge.

  • Palmer, F.R. (2001). Mood and modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Simpson, P. (2004). Stylistics: A Resource Book for Students, London: Routledge.

  • Thompson, Geoff (2004). Introducing Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.

  • Van Dijk, Teun A. (2000).Ideology and Discourse, a Multidisciplinary Introduction. Barcelona: PamperFabra University press. 

  • Wang, J. (2010). “A Critical discourse analysis of Barack Obama's speeches”. Journal of Language Teaching and Research. Vol. 1. No. 3. Pp. 254-261.


Zhuanglin, Hu. (1988). A Course of Linguistics. Peking: Peking University Press.


 

Language Related Research
Volume 7, Issue 7
March and April 2016
Pages 23-49