بی اهمیت جلوه دادن مطالب در ارائه‌های علمی فارسی: دسته بندی بر اساس نقش در کلام

•   زارع، جواد؛ اسلامی راسخ، عباس و عزیزالله دباغی. (زیر چاپ). «ارائه­های علمی انگلیسی و فارسی: بررسی چگونگی تفکیک مطالب مهم از کم‌اهمیت در پیکره‌های سخن و بیس». زبان‌پژوهی.

• Ädel, A. (2010). “Just to give you kind of a map of where we are going: a taxonomy of metadiscourse in spoken and written academic English”. Nordic Journal of EnglishStudies. 9(2). Pp. 69–97.


• Bednarek, M. (2008). “‘An increasingly familiar tragedy’: evaluative collocation and conflation”. Functions of Language. 1(1). Pp. 7–34. doi:10.1075/fol.15. 1.03bed


• Biber, D., S. Johansson; G. Leech; S. Conrad & E. Finegan (1999). Longman Grammar ofSpoken and Written English. London: Longman.


• Björkman, B. (2011). “The pragmatics of English as a lingua franca in the international university: Introduction”. Journal of Pragmatics.43(4). Pp. 923–925. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2010.08.015


• Caffi, C. (1999). “On mitigation”. Journal of Pragmatics. 31(7). Pp. 881–909. doi:10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00098-8


• Crawford Camiciottoli, B. (2004). “Audience-oriented relevance markers in business studies lectures”. In G. Del Lungo Camiciotti & E. Tognini Bonelli (eds.) Academic Discourse: Linguistic Insights into Evaluation. Bern: Peter Lang. Pp. 81–97.


• Deroey, K.L.B. (2013). Relevance Marking in Lectures: a Corpus-based Study. Unpublished PhD Dissertation. Ghent University, Gent, Belgium.


• Deroey, K.L.B. & M. Taverniers (2011). “A corpus-based study of lecture functions”. ModernaSpråk. 105(2). Pp. 1–22.


• Deroey, K.L.B. & M. Taverniers (2012a). “‘Ignore that ‘cause it’s totally irrelevant’: Marking lesser relevance in lectures”. Journal of Pragmatics. 4(14). Pp. 2085–2099. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2012.10.001


• Deroey, K.L.B. & M. Taverniers (2012b). “Just remember this: Lexicogrammatical relevance markers in lectures”. English for Specific Purposes. 31(4). Pp. 221–233. doi:10.1016/j.esp.2012.05.001


• Flowerdew, J. (1994). “Research of relevance to second language lecture comprehension: An overview”. In J. Flowerdew (ed.) Academic listening: Research Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 7–29.


• Hunston, S. (2000). “Evaluation and the planes of discourse: Status and value in persuasive texts”. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (eds.) Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and theConstruction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. 176–207.


• Lin, C.Y. (2010). “'... that's actually sort of you know trying to get consultants in...': Functions and multifunctionality of modifiers in academic lectures”. Journal of Pragmatics. 42(5). Pp. 1173–1183. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2009.10.001


• Lodico, M. G.; D.T. Spaulding & K.H. Voegtle (2006). Methods in Educational Research fromTheory to Practice. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.


• Lynch, T. (1994). “Training lecturers for international audiences”. In J. Flowerdew (ed.) Academic Listening: Research Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 269–289.


• McKeachie, W.J. (1994). Teaching Tips: Strategies, Research, and Theory for College andUniversity Teachers. Lexington: Heath and Co.


• Olsen, L. A. & T. H. Huckin (1990). “Point-driven understanding in engineering lecture comprehension”. English for Specific Purposes. 9(1). Pp. 33–47. doi:10.1016/0889- 4906(90)90027-A


• Overstreet, M. (1999). Whales, Candlelight, and Stuff Like That: General Extenders in EnglishDiscourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.


• Overstreet, M. & G. Yule (1997). “On being explicit and stuff in contemporary American English”. Journal of English Linguistics. 25(3). Pp. 250–258. doi:10.1177/007542429702500307


• Scott, M. (2015). WordSmith Tools version 6. Stroud: Lexical Analysis Software.


• Strodt-Lopez, B. (1991). “Tying it all in: asides in university lectures”. Applied Linguistics. 12(2). Pp. 117–140. doi:10.1093/applin/12.2.117


• Sutherland, P. & R. Badger (2004). “Lecturers’ perceptions of lectures”. Journal of Further andHigher Education. 28(3). Pp. 277–289. doi:10.1080/ 0309877042000241751


• Swales, J. M. & A. Burke (2003). ““It’s really fascinating work”: Differences in evaluative adjectives across academic registers”. In P. Leistyna & C. F. Meyer (eds.) CorpusAnalysis: Language Structure and Language Use. Amsterdam: Rodopi. Pp. 1–18.


• Thompson, G. & S. Hunston (2000). “Evaluation: an introduction”. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (eds.) Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. 1–27.

Zare, J. & M. Tavakoli (in press). “The use of personal metadiscourse over monologic and dialogic modes of academic speech”. Discourse Processes. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2015.1116342