A Minimalist Approach to the Distribution of the Sentential Negative Marker in Yes-No Questions in Dashtestani Dialect

Authors
K. Gholamalizadeh 1
S. Tafakkori Rezayi 2
H. Moghani 3
1 Assistant Professor of Linguistics, Islamic Azad University of Kermsnshah, Iran
2 Assistant Professor of Linguistics, Razi University of Kermsnshah, Iran
3 Ph.D. Candidate in Linguistics, Razi University of Kermsnshah
Abstract
The present descriptive-analytic paper aims to investigate the distribution of the sentential negative marker in yes-no questions in Dashtestani dialect. As well as adhering to the beginning of the tensed main verbs and tensed auxiliary verbs in this dialect, the sentential negative marker is used immediately before the phrasal complements as well as the beginning of the negative yes-no questions. Relying on some theoretical and cross-linguistic pieces of evidence, the study examines the mechanisms beyond the optional behavior of this marker, together with its distribution in the hierarchy of the yes-no questions within the framework of the Minimalist Program. The findings of the study showed that the sentential negative marker is considered a ‘negative prefix’ in the position immediately preceding the tensed main verb as well as auxiliary verbs, and a ‘negative particle’ before the phrasal complements, each of them being generated in a different position. Consequently, in yes-no questions, the negative marker as a negative particle moves to the head of CP, satisfying, in this way, the Negative Criterion and yielding an interrogative interpretation. Lack of such a movement, on the contrary, renders the sentence ungrammatical.

Keywords

  • کواک، سه‌را. (1387). ساخت جملات منفی در زبان فارسی. پایان‌نامه دکتری. تهران: دانشگاه تهران.

  • آذری، مطلب؛ علیزاده، علی؛ کرامتی یزدی، سریرا و مجتبی نامور فرگی. (1394). «حرکت‌های نحوی رو‌به‌پایین در زبان فارسی براساس کمینه‌گرایی». جستارهای زبانی. د 6. ش 6. صص 1ـ‌22.



  • Aboh, E.O. (1999). From the Syntax of Gungbe to the Grammar of Gbe. Editions à la Carte SA. Sierre: Suisse.

  • Chomsky, N. (1986). Barriers. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.

  • Chomsky, N. (2001). “Derivation by phase”. In Kenstowicz, M (Ed.) Ken Hale: A Life in Language. MIT Press.

  • Chomsky, N. [1995] (2015). The Minimalist Program. MIT Press.

  • Haegeman, L. (1995). The Syntax of Negation. Cambridge University Press.

  • Chomsky, N. & R. Zanuttini (1991). “Negative heads and the neg criterion”. The Linguistic Review 8. Pp. 233-251.

  • Halle, M. & A. Marantz (1993). “Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection”. In Hale, Ken and Keyser, Samuel J. (Eds.), The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger. Cambridge: MIT Press.

  • Han, C. (1998). The Structure and Interrelation of Imperativs: Mood and Force in Universal Grammar. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Pennsylvania.

  • Hornstein, N.; J. Nunes & K.K. Grohmann (2005). Understanding Minimalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Jespersen, O. (1917). Negation in English and Other Languages. Copenhagen: A.F. Høst.

  • Karimi, S. (1994). “Word order variations in modern contemporary Persian”. In M. Marashi (Ed.), Persian Studies in North America: A Festschrift for Professor M.A. Jazayery, Iranbooks. Pp. 43-73.

  • Karimi, S. (2001). “Persian complex DPs: how mystrious are they? ”, Canadian Journal of Linguistics. 46 (1-2). Pp. 63-96.

  • Klima, E.S. (1964). “Negation in English”. In J.A. Fodor & J.J. Katz (Eds.). The Structure of Language. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

  • Laka, I. (1991). “Negation in syntax: On the nature of functional categories and projections”. ASJU, XXV-I. Pp. 65-136.

  • Lasnik, H. (2002). “The Minimalist program in syntax”. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6. Pp. 432-437.

  • McCloskey, J. (1979). Transformational syntax and model theoretic semantics: A case-study in Modern Irish. Dordrecht: Reidel.

  • Moscati, V. (2006). The Scope of Negation. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Siena.

  • Ouhalla, J. (1990). “Sentential negation, relativized minimality and the aspectual status of auxiliaries”. Linguistic Review 7. Pp. 183–231.

  • Payne, J. R. (1985). “Negation”. In: Timothy Shopen (Ed.) Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. I: Clause Structure. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 197–242.

  • Pollock, J.Y. (1989). “Verb movement, universal grammar, and the structure of IP”. Linguistic Inquiry 20. Pp. 365-424.

  • Progovac, L. (1994). Positive and Negative Polarity: A Binding Approach. Cambridge University Press.

  • Weiss, H. (2002). “Three types of negation: a case study in Bavarian”. In: Sjef Barbiers, Leonie Cornips & Susanne Van der Kleij (Eds.), Syntactic Microvariation. Electronic Publication: Meertens Institute. Pp. 305-332.

  • Willis, D.; C. Lucas & A. Breitbarth (2013). “Comparing diachronies of negation”. In: The History of Negation in the Languagesof Europe and the Mediterranean, Vol. I: Case studies. David Willis, Christopher Lucas, and Anne Breitbarth (Eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. 1-50.

  • Zanuttini, R. (1997a). “Negation and verb movement”. In The New Comparative Syntax, L. Haegeman (Ed.). London & New York: Longman. Pp. 214-245.

  • Zanuttini, R. (1997b). Negation and Clausal Structure: A Comparative Study of Romance Languages. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Zanuttini, R. (2001). “Sentential negation”. In: The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory. Mark Baltin and Chris Collins (Eds.). USA: Blackwell Publishers. Pp. 511-535.

  • Zeijlstra, H.H. (2004). Sentential Negation and Negative Concord. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Amsterdam. Utrecht: LOT Publications.


 

Language Related Research
Volume 7, Issue 7
March and April 2016
Pages 73-95