Description and Analysis of Lawyerâs Linguistic and Meta Linguistic Procedures to Persuade the Judge in Public Courts of Iran: Criminal Court Discourse Analysis
1
PhD Student of General linguistics,Islamic Azad university science and research branch
2
professor of linguistics Department ,Tarbiat modares university ,Tehran ,Iran
3
Assistant Professor of Linguistics, Tarbiat Modarres University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
The present paper benefit from an analytical descriptive research methodology conducted in field method with the purpose of examining linguistics competence and its pragmatic approaches application in forensic linguistics discourse in order to assess various persuasion techniques used by lawyers in penal courts of Iran to persuade judges. The data of the research gathered from20 open sessions of Shiraz city court rooms which contains 2112 sentences altogether which 654 sentences belonging to lawyers, 351 sentences to the judges, 987 to the accused and 120 sentences to the plaintiffs. In the present study .only the sentences used by the lawyers have been assessed in terms of verbal and non- verbal persuasion techniques analysis. Also the researcher has been trying to answer the question :"How actors use verbal(syntax .semantics and pragmatics) and non-verbal methods to achieve their goals and persuade each other .Findings of the study indicated that the lawyers employ verbal techniques such as use of legal acts and pragmatics approaches such as :exclusion ,inclusion ,nominalization , emphasis on remorse, denial of accused s offence and non-verbal methods in court room discourse in the realm of forensic linguistics.
آسیایی، مریم (1393). بررسیفرآینداقناعدرسخنرانی‌ها ومناظره‌های کاندیداییازدهمیندورةانتخاباتریاستجمهوریایران(نگاه موردیبهدکترحسنروحانی). پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد زبان‌شناسی همگانی. شیراز: دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد علوم تحقیقات.
آقاگل‌زاده، فردوس (1384). «زبان‌شناسی قضایی (قانونی): رویکردی نوین در زبان‌شناسی کاربردی». مجموعه‌مقالات نخستینهمایشانجمنزبان‌شناسیایران. تهران: دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی.
آقاگل‌زاده، فردوس(1385). تحلیلگفتمانانتقادی. تهران: علمی و فرهنگی.
آقاگل‌زاده، فردوس(1391). زبان‌شناسی حقوقی (نظری و کاربردی). چ 2. تهران: نشر علم.
آقاگل‌زاده، فردوس(1390). «مطالعه تطبیقی شیوه بازنمایی کنش‌گران ایرانی و غربی در پرونده هسته‌ای ایران در رسانه‌های بین‌المللی (الگوی 2008ون‌لیوون)».جستارهای زبانی. د 4. ش 1 (بهار) صص 1-19.
اسدی، مسعود؛ ارسلان گلفام؛ فردوس آقاگل‌زاده و آزیتا افراشی (1394). «مؤلفه‌های زبان‌شناختی و جامعه‌شناختی- معنایی و بازنمایی کنش‌گران اجتماعی در متون مطبوعاتی». جستارهای زبانی. د 6. ش 1. صص 1-24.
رشیدی، ناصر (1391). «تحلیل لنتقادی گفتمان کتابreders choice براساس چهارچوب هاچ و کراس». پژوهش و نگارش کتب دانشگاهی. ش 26. صص 99-118.
رهبر، بهزاد و دیگران (1391). «رابطه جنسیت و قطع گفتار: بررسی جامعه‌شناختی زبان». جستارهای زبانی (پژوهش‌های زبان و ادبیات تطبیقی سابق). ش 3. د 4. صص 135-147.
صحفی، مولود (1392). «بررسی نقش جملات پرسشی در جهت اقناع مشتری در فروشگاه‌های شهر شیراز». مجموعه‌مقالاتدومینهمایشآموزشزبانفارسیو زبان‌شناسی فارس. دانشگاه آزاد واحد علوم و تحقیقات فارس. صص 74-93.
یول، جرج (1383). کاربردشناسی زبان. ترجمه محمد عمو‌زاده؛ مهدوی جو و منوچهر توانگر. تهران: سمت.
Aghagolzade, F. (2005). Forensic Linguistics: A New Approach in Applied linguistics: A Collection of the First ,Iranian Linguistic Assembly Summit Articles. Tehran: Allame Taba Tabaei University Publications [In Persian].
Aghagolzade, F. (2006). Critical Discourse Analysis. Tehran: Scientific and Cultural Publication Corporation [In Persian].
Aghagolzade, F. (2012). “Comparative study of Iranian and western represention techniques in Iranian Nuclear case in international media”. (van lions 2008 model). Linguistic Investigation Course. No. 13, Pp. 1-19 [In Persian].
Aghagolzade, F. (2012). Forensic linguistics (Theoretical and applied), 2th edition. Tehran: Sicence Publication. [In Persian].
Asadi, M. et. al., (2015). “Linguistic and Sociologic Semantic Representation Components”. Language Related Research. Vol. 6, No. 1, pp.1-24 [In Persian].
Asiaei, M. (2014). Investigation of Persuation Process in Speeches and Debates of Eleventh Presidential Election Candidate (Case study of Dr. Hassan Rouhani). M.A Thesis in general linguistics ,Shiraz Azad university, Science and Research Branch [In Persian].
Austin, J. L. (1970). How to Do Things with Words. oxford: oxfird university press.
Brown, G. & G. Yule (1983). Discourse Analysis. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
Davari, G. (2013). “Persuation Techniques”. Social Science Promotion Scientific Journal. No. 57, Pp. 78-75 [In Persian].
Havland C. I. (1946). Communication and Persuasion. New Haven :Yale University Press.
Havland, C. I.; A. A. Lumsdaine & F. D. Sheffield (1953). Expriment on Mass Communication. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Hodeg, R. & G. Kress (1996). Languag as Ideology. Great Britain :Red wood books.
Moloud, S. (2013). Investigation of interrogative sentences role in persuation of costumers in shiraz city. Shops. A collection of second linguistics and Farsi leaching summit articles [In Persian].
Rahbar, B. et. al. (2012). “The relationship between gender and conversation in terruption: sociologic study of language”. Linguist investigation Magazine. No. 3 & 4, Pp. 135-147 [In Persian].
Van leeuwen, T. (1996). "The Representation of Social actors". InC.R sm.coulthard (eds). Text and Practices, Reading in CDA. London: Routledge.
Van leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and Practice, New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford University Press.
Yule, G. (1996). The Study of Language (2nd ed). uk: Cambridge University Press.
Yule, G. (2004). Language Pragmatics. Translated by: Amouzade Mohammad, Tavangar Manouchehr and, 2, Tehran SAMT [In Persian].
Zimbardo, L. (1991). On the Ethics of Intervention in Human Psychological Research with Specifc Reference to the Standford Prison Experiment , Cohen, l.Manion.
Zaeri,A. , Aghagolzadeh,F. and Ameri,H. (2017). Description and Analysis of Lawyerâs Linguistic and Meta Linguistic Procedures to Persuade the Judge in Public Courts of Iran: Criminal Court Discourse Analysis. Language Related Research, 8(5), 139-158.
MLA
Zaeri,A. , Aghagolzadeh,F. , and Ameri,H. . "Description and Analysis of Lawyerâs Linguistic and Meta Linguistic Procedures to Persuade the Judge in Public Courts of Iran: Criminal Court Discourse Analysis", Language Related Research, 8, 5, 2017, 139-158.
HARVARD
Zaeri,A.,Aghagolzadeh,F.,Ameri,H. (2017). 'Description and Analysis of Lawyerâs Linguistic and Meta Linguistic Procedures to Persuade the Judge in Public Courts of Iran: Criminal Court Discourse Analysis', Language Related Research, 8(5), pp. 139-158.
CHICAGO
A. Zaeri, F. Aghagolzadeh and H. Ameri, "Description and Analysis of Lawyerâs Linguistic and Meta Linguistic Procedures to Persuade the Judge in Public Courts of Iran: Criminal Court Discourse Analysis," Language Related Research, 8 5 (2017): 139-158,
VANCOUVER
Zaeri,A.,Aghagolzadeh,F.,Ameri,H. Description and Analysis of Lawyerâs Linguistic and Meta Linguistic Procedures to Persuade the Judge in Public Courts of Iran: Criminal Court Discourse Analysis. Language Related Research, 2017; 8(5): 139-158.
Language Related Research
