A Critical Evaluation of EAP programs in Iran: Document Analysis and Authorities/Policy-makers’ Perspectives

Authors
M. R. Atai 1
A. Iranmehr 2
E. Babaii 3
1 Professor of English Language, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
2 Ph.D. Student, Department of English Language, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
3 Associate Professor, Department of English Language, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
This study aimed to examine the policies in the Iranian English for Academic Purposes (EAP) education and the extent to which objectives match the policies and are materialized through pedagogical practices implemented. To this end, EAP course descriptions developed by macropolicy-making level were evaluated through document analysis and triangulated with the authorities’ perspectives through interviews to see the degree of conformity between policy and practice. Seven policy areas in Kaplan and Baldauf’s (٢٠٠٥) language-in-education planning (LEP) were chosen as the theoretical framework of the study. Based on EAP document analysis and interviews with the authorities, the similarities and discrepancies in micro and macro levels were clarified. The results showed that EAP course descriptions do not include any comment on some policy areas, and there were discrepancies in policy and practice due to such factors as lack of communication channel between the EAP stakeholders and policy-makers. Finally, the study revealed that due to deficiencies in both policy and practice and in order to reach an acceptable status, EAP programs are in dire need for reconceptualizing policy-making and practice.

Keywords

  • دهباشی شریف فروزان و همکاران (1391). «بررسی چگونگی توسعۀ مهارت­های ارتباطی و توانش زبانی در آموزش مجازی در سطح دانشگاه­ها». جستارهای زبانی. ش 3(2). صص 85-114.

  • کیانی غلامرضا و همکاران (1390). «نگاهی دوباره به رویکرد برنامه درسی ملی نسبت به آموزش زبان­های خارجی». جستارهای زبانی. ش 2(6). صص 186-209.

    • Aghagolzadeh, F. & H. Davari (2017). English education in Iran: From ambivalent policies to paradoxical practices. In R. Kirkpatrick (Ed.) English language education policy in the Middle East and North Africa (pp. 47-62). Amesterdam: Springer.

    • Ahmadvand, M.; H. Barati & S. Ketabi (2013). Rights analysis of ESP courses: Towards democratizing ESP education. English for Specific Purposes World, 46.Pp. 1-13.

    • Asoudar, M.; M. R. Atai; S. Vaezi & S. S. Marandi (2014). “Examining effectiveness of communities of practice in online English for academic purposes (EAP) assessment in virtual classes”. Computers & Education. 70. Pp. 291-300.

    • Atai, M.R. (2002). “ESAP curriculum development in Iran: An incoherent educational experience”. Special Issue of the Journal of Persian Literature and Human Sciences of Tehran Teacher Training University, 1(3).Pp. 17-34.

    • Atai, M.R. (2006). EAP teacher education: Searching for an effective model integrating content and language teachers’ schemes. Proceedings of PAAL Conference (pp.23-41). Kangwong National University, Chuncheon, Korea.Retreived from: http://www. paaljapan.org/resources/proceedings/ PAAL11/pdfs/03.

    • Atai, M.R. (2013). English for specific purposes: International trends and Middle East concerns. In R. Akbari & C. Coombe (Eds.), The Middle East handbook of applied linguistics (Pp. 150-184). Dubai: TESOL Arabia Publications.

    • Atai, M.R. & F. Mazlum (2013). “English language teaching curriculum in Iran: planning and practice”, The Curriculum Journal, 24 (3). Pp. 389-411.

    • Atai, M.R. & O. Nazari (2011). Exploring reading comprehension needs of Iranian EAP students of health information management (HIM): A triangulated approach. System, 39(1), pp. 30-43.

    • Baldauf Jr, R.B.; M. Li & S. Zhao (2008). Language acquisition management inside and outside the school, In B. Spolsky & F.M. Hult (Eds.) The handbook of educational linguistics (Pp. 233-250). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

    • Belcher, D.D. (2006). “English for specific purposes: Teaching to perceived needs and imagined futures in worlds of work, study, and everyday life”. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1). Pp.133-156.

    • Benesch, S. (2001). Critical English for academic purposes: Theory, politics, and practice. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    • Bool, H.; D. Dunmore; A. Tonkyn; D. Schmitt & M. Ward Goodbody (2003). The BALEAP guidelines on English language proficiency levels for international applicants to UK universities. London: British Association of Lecturers in English for Academic Purposes.

    • Borg, S. (2003). “Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do”. Language Teaching, 36(2).Pp. 81-109.

    • Bowen, G.A. (2008). Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: a research note. Qualitative Research, 8(1).Pp. 137-152.

    • Campion, G. (2012). ‘The learning never ends’ Investigating teachers’ experiences of moving from English for general purposes to English for academic purposes in the UK context; What are the main challenges associated with beginning to teach EAP, and how can these challenges be overcome?(Unpublished M.A thesis). The University of Nottingham.

    • Dahbi, M. (2017). A call for English teachers in Morocco to practice agency through action research. In P.C.L. Ng, & E.F. Boucher-Yip (Eds.) Teacher Agency and Policy Response in English Language Teaching (Pp. 148-159). London: Routledge.

    • Dashtestani, R. (2016). “The effect of SMS-based L1 and L2 glosses on EAP students’ academic vocabulary learning and attitudes”. Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 3(3). Pp. 521-537.

    • Davari, H. & F. Aghagolzadeh (2015). “To teach or not to teach? Still an open question for the Iranian education system”. In C. Kennedy (Ed.) English Language Teaching in the Islamic Republic of Iran, Innovations Trends and Challenges. (Pp.13-19). London: British Council.

    • Dehbashi Sharif, F. et al. (2012). “Familiarity of foreign language faculties with E- teaching as an effective step in the development of communicative skills and linguistic competence”. Language Related Research. Vol. 3, No. 2. Pp 85- 114. [In Persian].

    • Ding, A. & G. Campion (2016). EAP Teacher Development. In K. Hyland, & P. Shaw (Eds.). The Routledge Handbook of English for Academic Purposes. (Pp.547-559), London: Routledge.

    • Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research Methods in Applied Linguistics: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    • Farhady, H. (2005). Reflections on and directions for ESP materials development in SAMT. In Proceedings of the First National ESP/EAP Conference (Vol. 3) (Pp. 2-32), Tehran, Iran.

    • Farhady, H. & H. Hedayati (2009). “Language assessment policy in Iran”. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 29. Pp. 132-141.

    • Hammond, M. & J. Wellington (2013). Research methods: the key concepts. London: Routledge.

    • Hayati, A.M. (2008). “Teaching English for special purposes in Iran: Problems and suggestions”. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 7.Pp.149-165.

    • Hutchinson, T., & A. Waters (2001). English for Specific Purposes: A Learning-Centered Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    • Hyland, K. (2006). English for Academic Purposes: An Advanced Resource Book. London: Routledge.

    • Kaplan, R.B. & R.B. Baldauf Jr (2005). Language-in-education policy and planning. In E. Hinkel (Ed.) Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (Pp. 1013-1034), Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    • Khany, R. & H. Tarlani-Aliabadi (2016). “Studying power relations in an academic setting: Teachers' and students' perceptions of EAP classes in Iran”. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 21. Pp. 72-85.

    • Kiyani, Gh. et al. (2012). “Revisiting the approach of national curriculum towards foreign Language education”. Language Related Research. Vol. 2, No. 2 . Pp 186- 209. [In Persian].

    • Mazdayasna, G. & M. H. Tahririan (2008). “Developing a profile of the ESP needs of Iranian students: The case of students of nursing and midwifery”. Journal of English for Academic purposes, 7(4). Pp. 277-289.

    • Mazraehno, F.T. & G. Mazdayasna (2016). “Developing ESAP materials: A case of graduate students of Islamic Jurisprudence”. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 13(1). Pp. 82-111.

    • Mirhosseini, S.A. & S. Khodakarami (2015). A glimpse of contrasting de jure–de facto ELT policies in Iran. In C. Kennedy (Ed.) English Language Teaching in The Islamic Republic of Iran: Innovations, trends and challenges. (Pp.23-34). London: British Council.

    • Mirhosseini, S.A. & S. Khodakarami (2016). “Aspects of ‘English language education’ policies in Iran: ‘Our own beliefs’ or ‘out of who you are’”? Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 11(3). Pp. 283-299.

    • Mirza-Suzani, S.M.; L. Yarmohammadi & M. Yamini (2011). “A critical review of the current situation of teaching ESP in the Iranian higher education institutions”. The Iranian EFL Journal, 36(3). Pp. 179-204.

    • Salas, S.; L.A. Mercado; L.H. Ouedraogo & B. Musetti (2013). “English for specific purposes: Negotiating needs, possibilities, and promises”. English Teaching Forum, 51(4). Pp. 12-19.

    • Soudmand-Afshar, H. S. & H. Movassagh (2016). “EAP education in Iran: Where does the problem lie? Where are we heading?”. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 22. Pp. 132-151.

    • Spolsky, B. (2009). Language management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    • Stoller, F.L. (2016). EAP materials and tasks. In K. Hyland, & P. Shaw (Eds.) The Routledge handbook of English for academic purposes (Pp. 577-591). London: Routledge.

    • Taherkhani, R. (2016). Exploring Iranian EAP teachers’ cognitions, State of Collaboration, Methodologies, Materials Production, and Assessment Practices (Unpublished PhD dissertation), Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.

    • Tavakkoli, M.; N. Nasri & M. Rezazadeh (2013). “Applying strategies for dealing with lack of subject knowledge: Can language teachers be effective ESP teachers?”. English for Specific Purposes World, 37(13). Pp. 1-14.




 

Language Related Research
Volume 8, Issue 6
January and February 2017
Pages 161-189