بررسی مقایسهای آسیب‌شناسی یادگیری و آموزش زبان انگلیسی و عربی در ایران از دیدگاه دبیران آموزش و پرورش: یک تحقیق داده‌بنیاد

نویسندگان
1 استادیار دانشگاه حکیم سبزواری، گروه زبان و ادبیات عربی، سبزوار، ایران.
2 استادیار دانشگاه حکیم سبزواری، گروه زبان و ادبیات انگلیسی، سبزوار، ایران.
چکیده
هدف از این تحقیق کیفی بررسی مقایسه­ای آسیب­ها و مشکلات تدریس و یادگیری درس زبان انگلیسی و زبان عربی در دبیرستان­های ایران با استفاده از روش داده­بنیاد یا نظریۀ گروندد است. از طریق مصاحبۀ نیمه ـ ساختاری با پنج دبیر زبان انگلیسی و هفت دبیر عربی که با نمونه­گیری نظری از بین دبیران دبیرستان­های مختلف شهر سبزوار، انتخاب شدند، داده­های این تحقیق جمع­آوری شد. تحلیل داده­ها با استفاده از نرم­افزار مکس کیودا (MAXQDA) و بر اساس سه سطح کدگذاری باز، محوری و انتخابی در نظریۀ داده­بنیاد صورت گرفت. دو مدل نظری آسیب­شناسی زبان عربی و نیز آسیب­شناسی زبان انگلیسی ارائه شد که در هر یک، مشکلات تدریس و یادگیری زبان (عربی/ انگلیسی) به­عنوان مقولۀ اصلی و معلم، دانش­آموز و امکانات آموزشی به­عنوان مقوله­های ثانویه مطرح شد. نتایج تحقیق نشان داد که با وجود بعضی تفاوت­ها بین این دو زبان، برخی مشکلات تدریس و یادگیری بین زبان عربی و انگلیسی مشترک هستند. در این مقاله پیامدهای آموزشی متعددی در رابطه با دبیران، دانش­آموزان و برنامه­ریزان درسی نیز مورد بحث قرار گرفته است.


Grounded Theory

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


• Afzali, Z. (2007). “Methods of teaching language and the justification of the four skills”. The Collection of the Articles of the 3th National Convention of the Heads of Arabic Department. Tir, 19- 20.Pp: 9-22. Hamadan, Bu Ali Sina University [In Persian].
• Amini, L. (2004). “Analysis of the students’ lack of interest in Arabic language (Gilan Gharb, Shahid Motahari university”). Retrieved from http://www. parsine.com /fa /news/[In Persian].
• Ashari, N. & N. Zarrin (2014). “Problems in using communicative language teaching in Iran and possible solutions”. Technical Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 4(4).Pp.257-266.
• Azimi Hashemi, M. (2003). “The investigation of the amount of the propensity of the high school students to education and the effective factors on it”. Retrieved September 2017 from: http://www.khedu.ir/article/index.asp?activestatecode [Persian].
• Bernard, H. R. (2011). Research Methods in Anthropology: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches (6th ed.) . Maryland: Altamira Press.
• Bretag, T.; S. Horrocks & J. Smith (2002). “Developing classroom practice to support NESB students in information systems courses: Some preliminary findings”. International Education Journa. 3 (4).Pp. 57-69.
• Buck, G. (2001). Assessing Listening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Byram, M.; B. Gribkova & H. Starkey (2002). Developing the Intercultural Dimension in Language Teaching a practical Introduction for Teachers. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
• Cezubaj, C. A. (1996). “Maintaining teacher motivation”. Education 116 (3). Pp. 372-379.
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. London: Sage.
• Corbin, J. & A. Strauss (1990). “Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria”. Qualitative Sociology, 13 (1). Pp. 3-21.
• Dornyei, Z. (2001). Motivational Strategies in the Language Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Dornyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in Applied Linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Ellis, N. (2002). “Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition”. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 24 (2). Pp. 143-188.
• Qaem, M. (2003). Teaching the Writing Skill in Iran, the Obstacles and Solutions: The Collection of the National Symposium of the Head of Arabic Departments. Hamadan, Buali University. [In Persian].
• Ghanbari, B. & S. Ketabi (2011). “Practicing a change in an Iranian EFL curriculum: From ivory tower to reality”. Iranian EFL Journal, 7 (6). Pp. 9-13.
• Glaser, B. G. A. L. & Strauss (1967). The Discovery of Grounded theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New Brunswick: Aldine Transaction.
• Haqdustrad, Z. (2009). “The obstacles for learning Arabic language in high school from the point of view of teachers”. The Book of Literature of the Month. 27. Pp. 36-46[In Persian].
• Hakimzadeh, R.; I. Motaqizadeh & N. Soltaninejad (2015). “The study of the Arabic language efficiency in the high schools of Kerman from the point of view of teachers and students”. Language related Research, 6(2).Pp. 77-106[In Persian].
• Hamouda, A. (2013). “An investigation of listening comprehension problems encountered by saudi students in the EL listening classroom”. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 2 (2).Pp. 113-15.
• Harmer, J. (1983). The Practice of English Language Teaching. London: Longman.
• Hellsten, M. A. & Prescott (2004). “Learning at university: the international students experience”. International Education Journal. 5 (3). Pp. 344-351.
• Khaqani, M.; M. Liaghatdar & T. Pakizeju (2006). “Investigating the lack of interest of the high school students to learn Arabic language from the view of the teachers in Shiraz high schools”. The Iranian Association of Persian and Arabic Language, 2(5).Pp. 47-48.[In Persian].
• Majidi, H. & M.Tavakkoli (2011). “The pedagogical challenges of listening comprehension skill for Arabic language and literature learners in Iran”. The collection of papers in the conference of new approaches of interdisciplinary development in Arabic language and literature. Yazd. University of Yazd.
• Mills, A. J.; G. Durepos & E. Wiebe (2010). Encyclopedia of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE.
• Milton, J. & H. Daller (2007). The interface between theory and learning in vocabulary acquisition. Paper presented at the EUROSLA, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
• Milton, J. (2009). Measuring second language vocabulary acquisition. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
• Mirzaie Rizi, B. & A. Siddiqui (2014). “Deficiencies in teaching and learning english as a foreign/second language in the secondary schools of Iran & India”. International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Literature. 2 (6).Pp. 5-14.
• Morrison, S. (2003). “Arabic language teaching in the United States, ERIC clearinghouse on languages and linguistics”. http://www.cal.org/resources/ archive/langlink/0603.html
• Mottaqizade,. I.; N., Parvin; D. Rakati & S. Esmaili (2013). “The level of implementing methods and skills of teaching grammar for the students at BA level from the perspective of the professors”. Language Related Research . 4(2). Pp. 159-178.[In Persian].
• Mottaqizadeh, I.; D., Mohammdadi Rakati & M. Shirazizadeh (2010). “Studying and analyzing the reasons for students’ weakness in the four skills from the perspective of the students and professors”. Language Related Research. 1(1). Pp. 115-137.[In Persian].
• Munro, M. J. & T. M. Derwing (1999). “Foreign accent, comprehensibility and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners”. Language Learning, 49 (1).Pp. 285-310.
• Nan, C. (2015). “Grammar and grammaring: Toward modes for English grammar teaching in China”. English Language Teaching. 8 (12), pp. 79-85.
• Noughabi, M. A. (2017). “Current pedagogical challenges in Iranian EFL teachers' views: A qualitative study”. Journal of Education and Practice, 8 (9), pp. 217-228.
• Oreisedigh, Z. (2003). “The measurement of high school students’ inclination toward learning Arabic language”. Retrieved from http://www.khedu.ir/article/ index.asp?activestatecode [In Persian].
• Osada, N. (2004). Listening Comprehension Research: A Brief Review of the Last Thirty Years. TALK, Japan.
• Parvini, K. (2010). “A critical analysis of the methods of teaching Arabic based on direct method”. Language Related Research. 1(2), pp. 32-37[In Persian].
• Peng, Y. (2017). A survey of grammar instruction from scholastic perspective”. English Language Teaching, 10 (5), pp. 76-80.
• Penick, J. E. & R. L. Harris (2005). Teaching with Purpose: Closing the Research-Practice gap. USA: NSTA Press.
• Pishqadam, R. & M. Moradi Moqadam (2013). “The ecological studies in teaching languages: The role of parents in improving learners’ proficiency”. Language Related Research. 4(4). Pp. 31-54.[In Persian].
• Rasuli, H. (2005). “Probing the problems of teaching Arabic in Iranian Universities”. The Journal of Human Science Research of Shahid Beheshti University. Pp.107-108 .[In Persian].
• Richard, J. C. & T. S. C. Farrell (2011). Practice Teaching: A Reflective Approach. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press .
• Richards, J. C. (2001). “The role of textbooks in a language program”. RELC Guidelines. 23 (2).Pp. 12-16.
• Roberts, M. (2007). Teaching in the Multilevel Classroom. Pearson Education. Retrievedfrom: http://www.pearsonlongman.com/ae/download/adulted/multilevel_monograph.pdf
• Robertson, M.; M. Line; S. Jones & S.Thomas (2000). “International students, learning environments and perceptions: A case study using the Delphi technique”. Higher Education Research and Development, 19 (1).Pp. 89-102.
• Safari, P. & N. Rashidi (2015). “A critical look at the EFL education and the challenges faced by Iranian teachers in the educational system”. International Journal of Progressive Education, 11 (2). Pp. 14-28.
• Safari, P. & R. Sahragard (2015). “Iranian EFL teachers’ challenges with the new ELT program after the reform: From Dream to Reality”. Khazar Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. 18 (4). Pp.65-88.
• Salimi, A. (2007). Teaching Arabic in Iranian schools and Universities: The Deficiencies and Solutions. The Collection of the Articles of the Iranian Arabic teachers. Bualisina University .[In Persian].
• Shokrani, R. (1996). “On the necessity of changes in teaching Arabic language”. The Research and Scientific Journal of Humanities, 8. Pp. 20-38[In Persian].
• Tahmasebi, A. et. al. (2016). “Effectiveness of ATN-D Pattern on the Process of Learning Arabic Language Conversation”. Language Related Research. 6(1), 173-203.[In Persian].
• Wang, M. C. & G. A D. Haertel (2017). Teacher relationships. A digest of research from the Laboratory for Student Success. Retrieved from:
http://msan.wceruw.org/documents/resources_for_educators/Relationships/Teacher%20Relationships.pdf
• Willis, M. & Y. Ohashi (2012). “A model of L2 vocabulary learning and retention”. The Language Learning Journal. 40 (1). Pp. 125-137.
• Wong, J. K. (2004). “Are the learning styles of Asian internationals culturally or contextually based?”. International Education Journal. 4 (4). Pp. 154-166.