Examining the Effects of Emotioncy-based Teaching on the Emotions of Non-Iranian Female Persian Language Learners in Iran

Authors
S. Ebrahimi 1
R. Pishghadam 2
A. Estaji 3
A. Estaji 3
S. A. Aminyazdi 4
1 Ph.D. in General Linguistics, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
2 Professor of Language Education and Professor by Courtesy of Educational Psychology, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
3 Associate Professor of General Linguistics, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
4 Associate Professor of Educational Psychology, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
Abstract
Granted that senses and emotions are key components in facilitating the process of language learning and teaching, it is essential for different models of instruction to take language learners’ emotions into account. It is in fact believed that emotions could be generated from the involvement of senses. A pertinent concept which juxtaposes senses and their resultant emotions is emotioncy. The concept of emotioncy (emotion+), pioneered by Pishghadam, Tabatabaeyan, and Navari (2013), is based on the psychological findings of the Developmental Individual-Differences Relationship-based (DIR) model, suggesting that sensory emotions are the cornerstones of evolution and learning. Following the assumptions of this model, when a language learner has never heard of a concept/item, s/he has no emotions for it (Null emotioncy). When s/he hears about the concept/item, the degree of emotioncy for that word increases to the auditory level, and if s/he sees or touches that item, the emotioncy may surpasses the auditory level to the Visual and Kinesthetic levels, respectively. Direct involvement with the concept/item engenders Inner emotioncy which can be maximized by doing research (Arch emotioncy). At this stage, an accurate understanding of the subject will be formed which may lead to profound learning. Drawing upon the emotioncy model, in this study, the researchers made an attempt to teach a number of Persian language issues and, thereafter investigate the effect of this model on the emotions of the Persian language learners and their learning outcomes. To do so, 60 non-Iranian female students with the same Persian level (7th grade) from 16 different countries (including India, Pakistan, Malaysia, Turkey, Egypt, Madagascar, Burundi, Afghanistan, Azerbaijan, Libya, Tajikistan, Lebanon, Iraq, Guinea-Bissau, Syria, and Indonesia) who were studying at Al-Mostafa International University were categorized into 4 groups of 15 and participated in classes for a period of 6 weeks. Different concepts were taught during each session according to each level of emotioncy. At the end of each session, the learners’ emotions were evaluated via the academic emotions questionnaire Pekrun, 2002) and emotioncy scale (Pishghadam, 2015). The results related to the auditory session revealed that the learners did not show very positive emotions for the relevant subject. Yet, their emotions improved in the Visual session. The change in the emotions of the learners from negative to positive was also evident in the kinesthetic session. At this stage, learners were more actively involved with the subject and gave convincing reasons for their emotional experiences. In the fifth session (Inner), having brought the necessary and relevant instruments to the class, the instructor asked the learners to simulate the instructed subject. In the final session (Arch), the learners were asked to explore the resources available (cyberspace, library, etc.) about the topics taught during the fifth session. Overall, the results indicated significant differences in the emotions of non-Iranian female students, concluding that by involving senses in the process of teaching, the learners’ emotioncy level increases and positive emotions are thus produced. As a result, there was a positive correlation between emotioncy-based instruction and the amount of positive emotions on the part of non-Iranian Persian language learners. Taken together, the emotioncy model seems to help enhance the positive emotions of Persian language learners, providing a more successful learning environment for them.

Keywords

Subjects

• Akbari, F. (2008). The Critical Analysis of Methods of Teaching Persian to non-Persian learners (Unpublished M.A Thesis). Tarbiat-Moallem University of Sabzevar, Sabzevar, Iran. [In Persian].
• Arnold, J. (2006). Visualization: Language learning with the mind’ eye. In K. Arnold (Ed.) Affect in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Aviezer, H.; Y. Trope & A. Thdorov, (2012), “Body, cues, not facial expressions, discriminate between intense positive and negative emotions”. Science. 338 (61). Pp.1225-1229.
• Borsipour, B. (2016). Emotioncy and willingness to read: A case of Iranian EFL learners. Unpublished M.A Thesis, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran.
• Deci, E.L.; R.J. Vallerand; L.G. Pelletier & R.M. Ryne, (1991), “Motivation in education: The self-determination perspective”. The Educational Psychologist. 26. Pp. 346-352.
• Ebrahimi, Sh.; A. Estaji; R. Pishghadam & S.A. Aminyazdi, (2017), “Introducing emotioncy and examining its impact on flow and learning styles of learners of Persian as a foreign language”. Teaching Persian to Speakers of other Languages, 6(13). Pp. 57-82. [In Persian].
• Ebrahimi, Sh.; A. Estaji; R. Pishghadam & S.A. Aminyazdi (2017). “Assessing the effect of emotioncy model on non-Persian students' attitudes”. Language and Translation Studies. 2. Pp. 1-31. [In Persian].
• Ghadiri, M.H. (2005). “Anger management”. Marefat. 14. Pp. 93-106. [In Persian].
• Goetz, Th.; A. Zirngibl; R. Pekrun & N. Hall, (2003), “Emotions, Learning and achievement from an educational-psychological perspective”. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. Pp. 9-28.
• Golkowska, K. (2007). “The role of affect in developing communicative and cultural competence in ESP". In English Education and English for Specific Purposes. Retrieved March 1, 2017, from Qatar-weil.cornell.edu/about Us/fa/bios/golkowskaKrystyna.html.
• Greenspan, S. & S. Weider, (1998), The Child with Special Needs. Encouraging Intellectual and Emotional Growth. Perseus Publishing.
• Hebb, D. O. (1949). The Organization of Behavior: A Neuropsychological Theory. New York: Wiley.
• Isen, A. M. & E. Shmidt, (2007), “Positive affect facilitates incidental learning and divided attention while not impairing performance on a focal task”. Paper presented at the Emotions Pre-Conference at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Memphis, TN.
• Isen, A. M. (2008). “Some Ways in Which Positive Affect Influences Decision Making and Problem Solving”. In M. Lewis, J. Haviland-Jones, & L. F. Barrett (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (3rd ed. Pp. 548-573). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
• Kadivar, P.; V. Farzad; J. Kavoosiyan & F. Nikdel, (2009), “Validation of Pekrun’s academic emotions questionnaire”. Educational Innovations. 8(32). Pp. 7-30. [In Persian].
• Karimiyan, R.; M. Mohajer & M. Nabavi, (2005), The alphabet of communication. Tehran: Research Center for Media. [In Persian].
• Kim, Ch. & R. Pekrun, (2014). “Emotions and Motivations in Learning Performance”. Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology. Pp. 65-75.
• Mayer, R.E. (2003). “Elements of a science of e-learning”. Educational Computing Research, 29 (3). Pp. 297-313.
• Pekrun, R. (1998). “Students’ emotions: A neglected topic of educational research”. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 44. Pp. 230–248.
• Pekrun, R. ; Th. Goetz; W. Titz & R. Peery, (2002), Positive Emotions in Education. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Pishghadam, R. & A. Firooziyan Poor Esfahani, (2017), “Introducing emotioncy as an effective tool for the acceptance of Persian neologisms”. Language Related Research. 8(5). Pp. 79-105. [In Persian].
• Pishghadam, R. & Sh. Ebrahimi, (2017), “Introducing the emotioncy model and methods to improve the concept in teaching Persian to non-Persian language learners”. Paper presented at the Second National Conference on Teaching Persian Language and Literature, Mashhad: Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. [In Persian].
• Pishghadam, R. & Sh. Shayesteh, (2017), “The consolidation of life issues and language teaching on the life-language model of emotioncy”. Humanizing language Teaching. 19 (2). Pp. 1-14.
• Pishghadam, R. (2015). “Emotioncy in language education: From exvolvement to involvement”. Paper presented at the 2nd conference of Interdisciplinary Approaches to Language Teaching, Literature, and Translation Studies. Iran, Mashhad.
• Pishghadam, R. (2016a). “Emotioncy, extraversion, and anxiety in willingness to communicate in English”. Paper presented at the 5th international Conference on Language, Education and Innovation, London: UK.
• Pishghadam, R. (2016b), “A look into the life of the senses: Introducing educational emotioncy pyramid”, [PowerPoint slides]. Retrieved from http://pishghadam.profcms.um.ac.ir/index.php/index.php?option=com_profactivity&task=allPublications
• Pishghadam, R. ; M. Tabatabaeyan & S. Navari, (2013), A critical and practical analysis of first Language Acquisition Theories: The Origin and Development. Mashhad: Ferdowsi University of Mashhad Press. [In Persian].
• Pishghadam, R. ; B. Adamson & Sh. Shayesteh, (2013), “Emotion-based language instruction (EBLI) as a new perspective in bilingual education”. Multilingual Education. 3 (9). Pp. 1-16.
• Pishghadam, R. ; H. Jajarmi & Sh. Shayesteh, (2016), “Conceptualizing sensory relativism in light of emotioncy: A movement beyond linguistic relativism”. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language, 4 (2).Pp. 11-21.
• Pishghadam, R. ; M. Zabetipour & A. Aminzadeh, (2016), “Examining emotions in English language learning classes: A case of EFL emotions”. Issues in Educational Research. 26 (3). Pp. 508.
• Pishghadam, R. ; Sh. Shayesteh & S. Rahmani, (2016), “Contextualization- emotionalization interface: A case of teacher effectiveness”. International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences. 5 (2). Pp. 97-127.
• Pour Afkari, N. (2007). Comprehensive dictionary of psychology and psychiatry. Tehran: Frahang-e-Ma'aser. [In Persian].
• Rugg, M. D. (1990). “Event-related brain potentials dissociate repetition effects on high- and low-frequency words”. Memory & Cognition, 18 (4). Pp. 367-379.
• Schutz, P. A. & R. Pekrun (2007). Emotion in education, San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
• Shahian, L. (2016). Examining the relationship between flow, emotioncy and reading comprehension: A case of iranian EFL Learners. Unpublished M.A Thesis, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran.
• Siyavashi, S. (2010). “The significance and the ways of teaching cultural issues in Persian language teaching classes”. The First International Conference on Expanding Persian Language and Literature- The Professors of Persian Panguage, Tehran, Allameh Tabatabe'i University. [In Persian].
• Spielmann, G. & M. Radnofsky, (2001), “Learning Language under tension: new directions from a qualitative study”. The Modern Language Journal. 85. Pp. 259-278.
• Sterr, A.M. (2003), “Attention performance in young adults with learning disabilities". Learning and Individual Differences. 14 (3). Pp. 125-133.
• Vahedi, Sh. & S. Ghare Aghaji, (2014), “Investigation of the self-regulated learning strategies in math according to motivational aspects and intervention of academic emotions”. Educational Technology and Learning, 1(1). Pp. 85-109. [In Persian].
• Yang, H.; S. Yang & A. M. Isen, (2013), “Positive affect improves working memory: Implications for controlled cognitive processing”. Cognition and Emotion. 27 (3). Pp. 474-482.
• Zare, H. (2014). “A causative model to predict the achievement of online university students: The role of intellectual beliefs, achievement goals and academic emotions". Research in School and Virtual Learning, 1(3). Pp. 9-18. [In Persian].
• Zatorre, R. J.; D. R. Fields & H. J. Berg, (2012), ”Plasticity in gray and white: Neuroimaging changes in brain structure during learning”. Nature Neuroscience. 15 (4). Pp. 528-536.
• Zull, J. E. (2011). From Brain to Mind: Using Neuroscience to Guide Change in Education. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing, LLC.
Language Related Research
Volume 9, Issue 3 - Serial Number 45
July and August 2018
Pages 63-97