بررسی جایگاه روساختی فاعل در زبان فارسی برپایۀ شواهد روان‌زبان‌شناختی

• Adger, D. (2004). Core Syntax: A Minimalist Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Anoushe, M. (2008). The Structure of Sentence and its Functional Projections - A Minimalist Approach. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Tehran .[In Persian].
• Anoushe, M. (2010). “Topicalization and focus movement in Persian: A feature-based approach.” Language Research, 1, 1. Pp. 1-28 .[In Persian].
• Chomsky, N. (1991). “Some notes on the economy of derivation and representation.” In R. Freidin (ed). Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar. Cambridge. Mass.: MIT Press. Pp. 417-454. [Reprinted in Chomsky (1995)].
• Chomsky, N. (1994). “Bare phrase structure.” MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics. 5.
• Clifton, C. & Odom, P. (1966). “Similarity relations among certain English sentence constructions”. Psychological Monographs. 80.Pp. 1–35.
• Dabir Moghaddam, M. (1990). “On postposition rà in Persian”. Iranian Journal of Linguistics. 7. pp. 2-60 [In Persian].
• Darzi A. & R. Mehdi Beyraghdar, (2010), “Exploring the position of topic in Persian - A Minimalist Approach”. Language Research. 2.Pp. 1-18. [In Persian].
• Darzi A. & V. Sadeghi, (2015), The Syntactic and Phonetic Correlates of Topicaliztaion and Raising Construction in Persian. Tehran: University of Tehran Press. [In Persian].
• Darzi A. (1993). “Raising in Persian.” In the Proceedings of the Tenth Eastern States Conference on Linguistics. Pp. 81-92.
• Darzi A. (1996). Word Order, NP Movement and Opacity Conditions in Persian. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
• Darzi A. (2006). “The necessity of distinguishing between raising and topicalization in Persian”. Dastur. 2. Pp.161-187. [In Persian].
• Darzi A. (2009). “Case and agreement in the raising structure from within the finite sentences”. Journal of the Faculty of Literature and Humanities. University of Tehran. 189. Pp. 73-109 .[In Persian].
• Fodor, J. A.; T. G. Bever & M. F. Garrett, (1974), The Psychology of Language. New York: McGraw Hill.
• Fodor, J. A. & M. Garrett, (1967), “Some syntactic determinants of sentential complexity.” Perception and Psychophysics. 2.Pp. 289-296.
• Ghomeshi, J. (2001). “Control and thematic agreement.” Canadian Journal of Linguistics. 46.Pp. 1-2.
• Harley, T. A. (2014). The Psychology of Language (4th edn). Hove. UK: Psychology Press.
• Hornstein, N.; J. Nunes & K. Grohmann, (2005), Understanding Minimalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Just, M. A. & P. A. Carpenter, (1971), “Comprehension of negation with quantification.” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 10. Pp. 244–253.
• Kanduboda, A. B. P. & K. Tamaoka, (2009), “Priority information in determining canonical word order of colloquial Sinhalese sentences.” Proceedings of the 139th Conference of the Linguistic Society of Japan. 1: 32-37.
• Kanduboda, A. B. P., & Tamaoka, K. (2010). “Priority information for canonical word order of written Sinhala sentences.” Proceedings of the 140th Conference of the Linguistic Society of Japan. Pp. 358-363.
• Karimi, S. (2005). A Minimalist Approach to Scrambling: Evidence from Persian. Berlin. Mouton de Gruyter.
• Koizumi, M. & T. Katsuo, (2010). “Psycholinguistic evidence for the VP-internal subject position in Japanese.” Linguistic Inquiry. 41. Pp. 663-680.
• Larson, R. K. (1988). “On the double object construction.” Linguistics Inquiry. 19. Pp. 335-391.
• Lasnik, H. (2001). “Derivation and representation.” In M. Baltin and Ch. Collins (eds). The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. 62-88.
• Marantz, A. (2005). “Generative linguistics within the cognitive neuroscience of language.” The Linguistic Review. 22. Pp. 429-445.
• Mehrabi, M. (2014). “Lexical information of Persian transitive verbs during Sentence comprehension”. Language Related Research. 1. Pp. 271-295. [In Persian].
• Miller, G. A. & K. O. McKean (1964). “A Chronometric study of some relations between sentences.” Journal of Experimental Psychology. 16. Pp. 297–308.
• Sarokhani, B. (1994). Research Methods in Social Sciences-principles and Foundations. Tehran: Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies. [In Persian].
• Schütze, C. T. (1996). The empirical base of linguistics: Grammaticality judgments and linguistics methodology. Chicago: The University of Chicago.
• Tafakkori Rezaie, Sh. (2010). Extended Projection Principle, Expletive and Agreement in Persian. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Tehran [In Persian].
• Tamaoka, K.; A. B. P. Kanduboda & H. Sakai, (2011), “Effects of word order alternation on the sentence processing of Sinhalese written and spoken forms.” Open Journal of Modern Linguistics. 1. Pp. 24-32.
• Ura, H. (2001). “Case.” In M. Baltin & C. Collins (eds.). The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. Pp. 334-373.
• Zagona, K. (1982). Government and Proper Government of Verbal Projections. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Washington. Seattle.