بررسی مقابله‌ای رده‌شناختی همگانی‌های گرینبرگ در گونه‌های ترکی رزن، تبریز و استانبولی

• Abbaschi, S. (1998). The study and classification of bound morphemes in Azari Turkish. M.A. Thesis in Linguistics. Tehran Islamic Azad University, Central Branch. [In Persian].
• Ajdarzadeh, M. (2003). A study of combination or compounding process in the word formation of Azari Turkish language, on the basis of Liber’s principle of thematic construction. M.A. Thesis in Linguistics. Tehran University. [In Persian].
• Amini, R. (2013). “Duality in turkish language”. Language Researches. Vol. 5. No, 3 (Successive 19). Pp. 27-54. [In Persian].
• Bisang, W. (No date). Typology3. Mainz 7. Sommerschule der DGfS wbisang@mail.uni-mainz.de. Retrieved:http://www.phil-fak duesseldorf.de summerschool2002/Bisang3.PDF.uni-
• Buch, Armin W. (2012). Linguistic Universals. Retrieved:http://www.sfs.uni-tuebingen.de/~abuch/12ws/lotw06.pdf
• Comrie, B. (1988). “Linguistic Typology”. California: Los Angeles, University of Sothern California, Department of Linguistics. 17: 145-159
• Dabir Moqaddam, M. (2013). Typology of Iranian languages. Vol. 1 Tehran: the Organization for Researching and Composing University Textbooks in the Humanities (SAMT) , The Center for Research and Development in Humanities. [In Persian].
• DinMohammadi, Gh. R. (2003). "Typology on the basis of principles and parameters". Literature and Humanities Faculty of Tehran University. No. 165.Pp. 169-184. [In Persian].
• GhorbanzadeKalanpaei, I. (2003). A Comparative Study of the Vocabulary in Istanbuli and Azari Turkish language. M.A. Thesis in Linguistics. Tehran Islamic Azad University, Centeral Branch. [In Persian].
• Golfam, A. (2000). “Linguistic similarities and differences: universals and typology". Journal of Literature & Humanities Faculty, University of Tehran. No. 155. Pp. 171-190. [In Persian].
• Greenberg, Joseph H. (1963), Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. Stanford University: Universals of Language. London: MIT Press. Pp. 73-113. Retrieved: http://pkdas.in/ JNU/typo/lu.pdf
• Guerra, Devon R. (2008). A Comparison of Joseph Greenberg’s “Language Universals” as Shown in the Palestinian Arabic, Spanish, and Korean Languages. Retrieved: http://digitalcommons.liberty.ed
• Hashemibani, R. (2000). A Linguistic description of the Turkish dialect of Ban. M.A. Thesis in Linguistics. Isfahan University. [In Persian].
• Hesabgar, H. (1992). Azari Turkish Phonetic System. M.A. Thesis in Linguistics. Allameh Tabataba'i University. [In Persian].
• HeydariMazraeJahan, A. (2002). The analysis of assimilation processes in Azari Turkish based on Autosegmental phonology. M.A. Thesis in Linguistics. Allameh Tabataba'i University. [In Persian].
• Howe, S. (No date). A Re-examination of Greenberg’s Universals. Retrieved: http://www.adm.fukuoka-u.ac.jp/fu844/home2/Ronso/Jinbun/L44-1/L4401_0209.pdf
• https://fa.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D8%AA%D8%A8%D8%B1%DB%8C%D8%B2
• https://fa.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D8%AA%D8%B1%DA%A9%DB%8C%D9%87
• https://fa.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D8%B4%D9%87%D8%B1%D8%B3%D8%AA%D8%A7%D9%86_%D8%B1%D8%B2%D9%86
• Jafari, B. (1995). A study of discourse morphological construction in Bahar (Hamadan) Turkish dialect in comparison to Azari Turkish language. M.A. Thesis in Linguistics. Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies. [In Persian].
• Jafari, M. A. (2003). A study of verb construction in Razan Turkish dialect. M.A. Thesis in Linguistics. Tehran Islamic Azad University, Central Branch. [In Persian].
• Jafari, M. A. ; M. Mirdehghan & Sh. Naqshbandi (In print). A typological analysis of rounding harmony in Turkish varieties of Razan, Tabriz and Istambuli on the basis of Korn's typology. Hamadan: Comparative Linguistics Researches. [In Persian].
• Jarrahi, B. (2000). Structural arrangement in Azari Turkish. M.A. Thesis in Linguistics. Allameh Tabataba'i University. [In Persian].
• Mahjubi, Sh. (1996). The comparative study of the vocabulary in Azari-Turkish dialects of Khalkhal and Astara from the viewpoint of linguistics. M.A. Thesis in Linguistics. Tehran Islamic Azad University, Central Branch. [In Persian].
• Mazlumi, A.R. (2000). A phonetic and lexical comparison of the Turkish varieties of Chaypare and Tabriz. M.A. Thesis in Linguistics. Tehran Islamic Azad University, Central Branch. [In Persian].
• Mirdehghan, M. & Sh. Mehmanchian (2012). “The word order in Saravi dialect and spoken language: A typological comparative study". Iranian Studies. Vol. 45, No. 3.
• Mirdehghan, M. (2013) "Ergative case & agreement marking: Similarities and Variations in Hindi/Urdu, Pashto and Balochi Languages". Dialectologia 10. Pp. 59-86. [In Persian].
• Mohammad NejadShebli, Sh.(2001). A study of compound and derivative nouns in Azari Turkish language. M.A. Thesis in Linguistics. Tarbiat Modarres University. [In Persian].
• Moradi, B. (2001). A comparative study of the dialects of Naqade and Tabriz (two varieties of Azari Turkish). M.A. Thesis in Linguistics. Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies. [In Persian].
• Razinejad, M. (2002). Phonology of Meshkinshahr Turkish ialect on the basis of Autosegmental theory. Master's Thesis of Linguistics. Tehran University. [In Persian].
• SaberiHamedani, A. (1996). Hamedan's Detailed History. Vol. 1 Tehran: Hadis Press. [In Persian].
• Sadeqi Niyaraki, A. (1996). Turkish inflectional and derivational affixes in Niyaki dialect. M.A. Thesis in Linguistics. Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies. [In Persian].