ساخت‌های اسنادی ثانویه در زبان فارسی

• Aarts, B. (1992). Small clauses in English: The nonverbal types. Topics in English Linguistics. Berlin and New York, Mouton de Gruyter.
• Alhorais, N. (2013). The categorical status of the small clause node: A minimalist approach. Unpublished MA Thesis. University of Newcastle, United Kingdom.
• Anvari, H. & H. Ahmadi Givi (1995). Persian Grammar 2. Second ed. Vol. 12, Tehran: Fatemi Publications. [In Persian].
• Balazs, J. E.(2012). The Syntax of Small Clauses. M.A dissertation, Cornell University.
• Bateni, M. R. (1991). A Description of the Grammatical Structure of the Persian Language. Tehran: Amir Kabir [In Persian].
• Bowers, J. (1993). “The Syntax of Predication”. Linguistic Inquiry, 24.Pp. 591-652.
• Bowers, J. (2001). “Predication”. in M. Baltin and C . Collins (Eds) The Handbook of cotemporary Syntactic Theory .Pp.299-333 , Blackwell Publishers Inc.
• Bowers, J. (2002). “Transitivity”. Linguistic Inquiry 33: 183-224.
• Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
• Chomsky, N. (1986). Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Chomsky, N. (2005). On Phases. Ms., MIT.
• Chomsky, N. (2006). Approaching UG from below. Ms., MIT.
• Dabbir Moghaddam, M. (1990). “On“Ra” in Persian language”. Linguistics Magazine. Year 7, No. 1.Pp. 13-67 [In Persian].
• Dabbir Moghaddam, M. (2004). Theoretical Linguistics: Genesis and Evoloution of the Generative Linguistics. Second ed., Tehran: SAMT [In Persian].
• Hiraiwa, K. (2001). “ Multiple agree and the defective intervention constraint in Japanese” . MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 40. Pp. 67 – 80.
• Hornstein, N. & D. Lightfoot (1987). “Predication and PRO”. Language, 63-86.
• Hornstein, .N & D. Lightfoot (1984). Rethinking Predication. ms.
• Karimi, S. (2003). “ On object position , specificity and scrambling in Persian”, In s. Karimi(ed), word order and Scrambling Blackwell publishing Oxford.Pp.91-124.
• Khayampour, A. R. (1996). Persian Grammar. Vol. 10, Tehran. [In Persian].
• Kitagawa, Y. (1985). “Small but clausal”. Papers from the Twenty-first Regional Meeting of the Maryland. Chicago Linguistic Society, CLS 21. 210 – 220.
• Meshkato-dini, M. (1994). The Persian Language Grammar Based on Transformational Theory. Vol. 3, Mashhad: Ferdowsi University of Mashhad [In Persian].
• Raasekh-mohanad, M. (2005). “Exploring the Characteristics of “Tameez” in the Persian Language”. Naame ye Farhangestan. No. 27. Pp. 47-54 . [In Persian].
• Shahsavari, A. & E. Mohammadi (2015). “ predication phrase and small clauses in persian language”. Scro Research Annual Report. Vol. 3. Pp. 1-4. ISSN: 1494-7617.
• Shariat, M. J. (2000). Simple Grammar of the Persian language. Tehran: Asatir [In Persian].
• Stowell, T. (1981). Origins of Phrase Structure. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
• Stowell, T. (1983). Subjects Across Categories. The Linguistic Review 2. 285 – 312.
• Tabib-zadeh, O. (2001). “Analysis of verbal syntactic complementes in the Persian language based on Lexical Capacity Theory”. Linguistics, Year 16, no. 1(31 in sequence). Pp 43-76 [In Persian].
• Williams, E. (1974). “Small clauses in English”. In Kimball, J. (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 4. New York: Academic Press.
• Williams, E. (1975). “Small Clauses in English”. In J. Kimball, cd., Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 4, Academic Press.
• Williams, E. (1980). “Predication”. Linguistic Inquiry, Vol 11, No. 1. Pp. 203-238.
• Williams, E. (1983). “Against Small Clauses”. Linguistic Inquiry, 14.Pp. 203-238.
• Williams, E. (2013). “The Size of Small Clauses”. Seminar Talk on Jan. 25, Department of Linguistics. Princeton University.