پدیدارشناسی حضور سوژه و نقش گونه‌های حسی در ادراک ابژه: بررسی نشانه - معناشناختی داستانی از آبیِ ژان - میشل مولپوآ

• Babak-Moin, M. (2014). "Apport des perspectives phénoménologiques à la lecture des discours publicitaires". Etudes de langue et littérature françaises. Université Chahid Chamran d'Ahvaz. 5/n 2, Pp 25-36.
• Barthes, R. (1964). Le Degré zéro de l'écriture, Élém. de sémiologie. Paris: Seuil.
• Diandué, B-K-P. (2013). Réflexions géocritiques sur l'œuvre d'Ahmadou Kourouma. Paris: Publibook.
• Fontanille, J. (1999). Modes du sensible et syntaxe figurative. Limoge: Pulim.
• Fontanille, J. (1999). Sémiotique et littérature : Essais de méthode. Paris: PUF.
• Giromini, F. (2003). Psychomotricité: Les concepts fondamentaux: Eléments théoriques. Paris: Université Pierre et Marie Curie.
• Greimas, A-J. (1987). De l'imperfection. Perrigueux: Pierre Fanlac.
• Greimas, A-J. & J. Fontanille (1991). Sémiotique des passions. Des états de choses aux états d'âme. Paris: Hachette.
• Husserl, E. (1950). Idées directrices pour une phénoménologie. Paris: Gallimard.
• Levinas, E. (2006). En découvrant l'existence avec Husserl et Heidegger. Paris: Vrin.
• Maulpoix, J-M. (2005). Une histoire de bleu. Paris: Gallimard.
• Mounin, G. (1970). Introd. à la sémiologie. Paris: Minuit.
• Ouellet, P. (1992). "Signification et sensation". Nouveaux actes sémiotiques. n° 20. Limoges: Pulim.
• Saussure, F. (1916). Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot & Rivages.
• Babak Moin, M. & K. Paknejad Raseki (2014). “An analysis with a systematic approach to social semiotics in the framework of Eric Landowski's four semiotic systems”. Djame’e shenasie Iran. 16/ 1. Pp. 129-147. [In Persian].
• Babak Moin, M. (2013). “The semiotic system based on adjustment ; the passage from classical semiotics toward the semiotics with phenomenological perspective” Naghde zaban va adabiate kharedji. 6/ 10. Pp. 175-190. [In Persian].
• Babak Moin, M. (2014). Meaning as a Live Experience: the Passage from Classical Semiotics to Semiotics with a Phenomenological Perspective. Tehran: Sokhan. [In Persian]
• Barthes, R. (1964). The Zero Degree of Writing. Elem. of Semiology. Paris:Seuil.
• Diandué, B-K-P. (2013). Réflexions Géocritiques sur l'œuvre d'Ahmadou Kourouma. Paris: Publibook. [In French]
• Fontanille, J. (1999). Semiotics and Literature: Method tests. Paris: PUF. [In French]
• Fontanille, J. (1999). Sensitive Modes and Figurative Syntax. Limoge: Pulim. [In French].
• Giromini, F. (2003). Psychomotricity: The Fundamental Concepts: Theoretical Elements. Paris: Pierre and Marie Curie University. [In French]
• Greimas, A-J. (1987). Imperfection. Perrigueux: Pierre Fanlac. [In French]
• Greimas, A-J. & J. Fontanille (1991). Semiotics of the Passions. From States of Things to Status of Mind. Paris: Hachette. [In French]
• Hassanzadeh Mir Ali, A. & I. Kanaani (2011), “A Study of the Pattern of Discourse Semantics in Qaisar Aminpour Poetry”. Pajhouheshaye Adabe erfani (Gohar Gouya). 5/2 (18). Pp. 115-136. [In Persian].
• Husserl, E. (1950). Guiding Ideas for a Phenomenology. Paris: Gallimard. [In French]
• Kanaani, I. et. al., (2017). "From the physical system to adaptive interaction; Semiotics of experience in "A quiet romantic" by Nader Ebrahimi. Ravayat shenasi. 1/ 2. Pp. 105-127. [In Persian]
• Kanaani, I. et. al., (2014). “Examination of the semiotic effects of light on the basis of a story from Masnavi”. Kohannameye adabe parsi. 5/ 3. Pp. 121-148. [In Persian].
• Levinas, E. (2006). Discovering Existence with Husserl and Heidegger. Paris: Vrin.
• Maulpoix, JM. (2005). A story of blue. Paris: Gallimard. [In French]
• Mounin, G. (1970). Introduction to semiology. Paris: Minuit. [In French]
• Ouellet, P. (1992). “Meaning and sensation”. New semiotic acts. No. 20. Limoges: Pulim. [In French]
• Saussure, F. (1916). Course in General Linguistics. Paris: Payot & Rivages. [In French]
• Shairi, H. R. & B. Torabi (1391). "Review the conditions of production and reception of meaning in discourse communication". Zaban Pajhouhi. 3. Pp. 23-50. [In Persian]
• Shairi, H. R. & T. Vafai (2009). A path to fluid semiotic: the cqse study of Phoenix by Nima. Tehran:Elmi-Farhangi. [In Persian]
• Shairi, H. R. (2004). "The study of the fundamental role of sensory perception in the production of meaning". Pajhouheshnameye Olume Ensani. No. 45-46. Pp. 129-146. [In Persian]
• Shairi, H. R. (2006). Semiotic Discourse Analysis. Tehran: SAMT. [In Persian].
• Shairi, H. R. (2009). “From structural semiotics to discourse semiotics". Naghde adabi. 2/ 8. Pp. 33-52. [In Persian]
• Shairi, H. R. (2009). “The theoretical foundations of discourse analysis, a semiotic approach". Farhangestane Honar. 3/ 12. Pp. 54-72. [In Persian].
• Shairi, H. R. (2016). Semiotics of Literature: The Theory and Method of Analyzing Literary Discourse. Tehran: Tarbiat Modares University. [In Persian].
• Shairi, H. R. et. al., (2013). "Semiotic analysis of rain poetry". Adab Pajhouhi. 7/ 25. Pp. 59-90. [In Persian]
• Shairi, H. R. (2007). “The relationship between semiotics and phenomenology with an analytical sample of literary-artistic discourse". Adab pajhouhi. 1/ 3. Pp. 61-81. [In Persian]
• Shiri, Gh., et. al., (2017). “Discourse functional analysis of comic in the first part of Sa'di’s Golestan; a semiotic approach ”. Language Related Research. 8/ 8. Pp. 1-28. [In Persian].
• Teimourpour, S. & M. Babakmoin (2015). “A phenomenological approach to the problem of language leakage in the works of Natalie Saraute”. Language Related Research . 7/ 3 (31). Pp. 35-53. [In Persian] .