Negation and Its Position in Lori Dialect of Kohgilouyeh

Authors
A. Ahanghar 1
A. Khoshkhoo-nezhad 2
1 Associate Professor of Linguistics, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran
2 Ph.D. in Linguistics, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran
Abstract
Negation is one of the basic concepts in natural languages. In all natural languages, there exist negative statements corresponding to positive sentences. The meaning of negative sentences in these languages is contrary to the meaning of the corresponding positive sentences. The purpose of this study is to elucidate the morphological and syntactic representation of negation and its position in Lori dialect of Kohgilouyeh based on Minimalist Program. In this regard, the main research questions are:

1- Is the negative marker in Lori dialect a word or a prefix?

2. Does the negative marker place in different positions in Lori dialect?

Based on the main research questions, the following main hypotheses are expressed:

1. Negative marker in Lori dialect is a word.

2. Negative marker places in different positions in Lori dialect.

Although one of the authors is the native speaker of this dialect, the research data was extracted from the speech of five male and female elderly speakers, as well. The research results show that the negative marker in Lori dialect precedes the Tense Phrase/TP as an independent phrase and occurs in different positions in the sentence. In non-attributive and interrogative sentences, the negative marker manifesting in the head position of Negative Phrase (NegP1), first precedes the TP and then it is attracted by the verb. In this position, the relationship between the verb and the head of the negative phrase is realized by Agreement relation. The Negative Phrase2 (NegP2) is another position in which this marker appears in the indicative attributive sentences. In this position, the negative marker is not subject to any movement and remains in its situ position. In addition, in these sentences, the negative marker can also move to the specifier of Focus Phrase/FP. Similarly, the negative marker can occupy the head position of Complementizer Phrase/CP­ in yes-no question sentences. Moreover, this marker can be used as a prefix before the verb and also locate before the TP as a negative adverb.

Keywords

Subjects

• Adger, D. (2003). Core Syntax, a Minimalist Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Boeckx, C. (2006). Linguistic Minimalism: Origins, Concepts, Methods, and Aims. New York: Oxford University Press Inc.
• Chomsky, N. (1992). A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory (= MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 1). Cambridge, Massachusetts.
• Chomsky, N. (2001). “Derivation by phase”. In Kenstowicz, M (Ed.) Ken Hale: A Life in Language. MIT Press.
• Chomsky, N. [1995] (2015). The Minimalist Program. MIT Press.
• Darzi, A. (2008). Subjunctive-negation interaction in Persian, Proceeding of the 18th International Congress of Linguists, Korea University: Seoul,
Korea.
• Gholamalizadeh, Kh.; Sh. Tafakkori Rezayi & H. Moghani, (2017), “A minimalist approach to the distribution of the sentential negative marker in yes-no questions in Dashtestani Dialect”. Language Related Research. 7(7). Pp. 73-95. [In Persian].
• Haegeman, L. (1995). The Syntax of Negation. Cambridge University Press.
• Hojatollah Taleghani, A. (2006). The Interaction of Modality, Aspect and Negation in Persian. Ph.D. Dissertation: University of Arizona.
• Hojatollah Taleghani, A. (2008). The Interaction of Modality, Aspect and Negation in Persian. John Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamin’s Publishing.
• Horn, L. (2000). Any and (-)ever. Free Choice and Free Relatives. WYNER, (2002): 71-111.
• Horn, L.)1989). A Natural History of Negation. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
• Hosseini-Maasoum, M. (2011). “The function of negation category in the syntactic analysis of Persian; An account of the negation process”. Journal of Linguistics & Khorasan Dialects. 3(5).Pp. 17-34. [In Persian].
• Jespersen, O. (1917). Negation in English and Other Languages. A. F. Host, Copenhagen.
• Karimi, S. & A. Taleghani, (2007), Wh-movement, interpretation, and optionality in Persian. Phrasal and clausal architecture: Syntactic Derivation and Interpretation.Pp. 167-187.
• Karimi, S. (2005). A minimalist approach to scrambling: Evidence from Persian (Vol. 76). Walter de Gruyter.
• Kwak, S. & A. Darzi, (2006). “The syntax and semantics of Persian NCI, hič-phrase”. Proceeding of the 2nd workshop on the Persian language and computer. Pp. 55-69. Tehran Univ.
• Kwak, S. (2010). “Negation in Persian”. Iranian Studies, 43(5).Pp. 621-636.
• Laka, I. (1990). Negation in syntax--on the nature of functional categories and projections (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Inst. of Technology Cambridge).
• Lasnik, H. (2002). The Minimalist program in syntax. Trends in Cognitive
Sciences 6. Pp. 432-437.
• Mazzon, G. (2004). A History of English Negation. Pearson Education.
• Moscati, V. (2006). The Scope of Negation. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Siena.
• Naghzguy Kohan, M. (2011). A comparative study of Grammaticalization and Degrammaticalization in Persian (A case study: change of some inflectional affixes into derivational ones). Journal of Linguistics & Khorasan Dialects. 3(4).Pp. 89-109 In Persian].
• Ouhalla, J. (1991). Functional Categories and Parametric Variation. London/New York: Routledge.
• Payne, J. R. (1985). “Negation”. In: Timothy Shopen (Ed.) Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. I: Clause Structure. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 197–242.
• Pesetsky, D. (1995). Zero Syntax: Experiences and Cascades. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Pollock, J.Y. (1989). Verb movement, universal grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry, 20.Pp. 365-424.
• Radford, A. (2004). Minimalist Syntax, Exploring the Structure of English.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Radford, A. (2009). Analysing English sentences: A minimalist approach. Cambridge University Press.
• Rezaei, A. (2013). “Position of negative group in Persian syntax. Master's thesis in General Linguistics. Allameh Tabataba'i University. [In Persian].
• Sediq Ziaberi, R.; A. Jafari & M. Dabirmoghadam (2005). “The analysis of the position of the negation element in the Persian language based on the framework of the Minimalist Program”. Collection of articles of the first conference of Linguistic Society of Iran. University of Tehran. [In Persian].
• Weiss, H. (2002). “Three types of negation: a case study in Bavarian”. In: Sjef
Barbiers, Leonie Cornips & Susanne Van der Kleij (Eds.), Syntactic Microvariation. Electronic Publication: Meertens Institute, pp. 305-332.
• Zanuttini, R. (1997b). Negation and Clausal Structure: A Comparative Study of Romance Languages. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Zeijlstra, H. (2016). Diachronic Developments in the Domain of Negation. Language and Linguistics Compass, 10(6).Pp. 284-295.
• Zeijlstra, H.H. (2004). Sentential Negation and Negative Concord. Ph.D.
Dissertation. University of Amsterdam. Utrecht: LOT Publications.
Language Related Research
Volume 9, Issue 5 - Serial Number 47
November and December 2018
Pages 1-33