ارزیابی کتاب انگلیسی پایۀ اول متوسطه، دورۀ دوم (ویژن ۱) بر اساس چک‌لیست از دیدگاه دبیران انگلیسی شهر کرمانشاه

• Abdullahi-Guilani, M.; M. S. Mohd Yasin & T. K. Hua (2011). “Authenticity of Iranian English textbooks for schools”. English Language and Literature Studies, 1 (2).Pp. 25-30.
• Abedi, A. & S.A.R. Arizi Samani (2003). “The content analysis of primary textbooks based on achievement motivation. Educational innovation. Volume 2 No 5 .Pp.29-54 [In Persian].
• Ahmadi Sada, M. et. al. (2016). “Overall evaluation of prospect 2 from teachers’ perspective”. Roshd Foreign Language Teaching Journal. Tehran. No 10. (22) Volume 51. [In Persian].
• Ahmadpour, Z. (2004). Investigating the problems of teaching English language at Iranian high schools. Roshd Foreign Language Teaching Journal. Tehran. No 2 (18). Volume 71. Pp. 15-21 [In Persian].
• Ajideh, P. & M. Panahi (2016). “An analysis of cultural-related content in English textebooks for Iranian students entitled "prospect" and "vision" Series”. International Journal of Language and Linguistics. Vol. 3, No. 6.
• Aliakbari, M. (2004). “The place of culture in the Iranian ELT textbooks in high school level”. 9th Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics Conference. Namseoul University, Korea.
• Allwright, R. (1982). “What do we want teaching materials for?". ELT Journal. Volume 36/1.
• Amal Saleh, E.; S. Sajjadi & L. Yarmohammadi (2006). “The representation of social actors in the EFL high school textbooks in Iran”. MEXTESOL Journal, 30(1).Pp. 9-23.
• Amini, M. & P. Birjandi, (2012). “Gender Bias in the Iranian High School EFL Textbooks”. English Language Teaching, 5/2.Pp. 134 – 147.
• Ansari, H, Babaii, E. (2002). “Universal characteristics of EFL/ESL textbooks: A step towards systematic textbook evaluation”. The Internet TESL Journal, 8(2).Pp. 1-9.
• Ansary, T. (2004). An analytic look at high school English textbook and introducing a sample lesson based on communicative syllabus design (Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Islamic Azad University-Tabriz Branch, Iran).
• Atai, M.R.; A. Iranmeher & S. Babaie (2017). Critical Evaluation of Iranian ESP university textbooks: content analysis , experts and language planners’ views. Language Related Research. 8(6). Pp. 161-189. [In Persian].
• Azizifar, A.; M. Koosha & A. Lotfi (2010). “An analytical evaluation of Iranian high school ELT textbooks from 1970 to the present”. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 3, Pp. 36-44.
• Azizifar, A. (2009). “An analytical evaluation of Iranian high school ELT textbook from 1970 to 2010". The Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2 (2). Pp. 52-79.
• Brown, J. (1995). The Elements of Language Curriculum. Boston, MA: Heinle and Heinle.
• Cunningsworth, A. (1995). Choosing Your Course Book. Oxford: Heinemann Publishers Ltd.
• Daoud, A. & M. Celce-Murcia (1979). Selecting and evaluating a textbook. In M. Celce-Murcia and L. McIntosh (Eds.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp. 302-307). Cambridge, MA: Newbury House Publishers.
• Diani, MH. (1987). Three formulas for determining textbooks readability. Tehran University Journal of Education and Psychology. Year 10, No. 3 .Pp 59-80. [In Persian].
• Ellis, R. (1990). Instructed Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
• Ghorbani, M. R. (2011). Quantification and graphic representation of EFL textbook evaluation results. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(5), 511-520. http://dx.doi.org/10.4304/tpls.1.5.511-520
• Grant, N. (1987). Making the Most of Your Textbook. Harlow:Longman.
• Gu, Y. (2005). Vocabulary Learning Strategies in the Chinese EFL Context. Singapore: Marshall Cavendish Academic
• Hanifa, R. (2018). EFL Published Materials: An Evaluation of English Textbooks for Junior High School in Indonesia. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, [S.l.], Vol. 9, No. 2. Pp. 166-174. Available at: . Date accessed: 15 June 2018. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.9n.2p.166.
• Harmer, J. (2007). How to Teach English. China: Pearson Education Limited.
• Hossein Nasab, D.; F. Farokhi & Zh. Morsali, (2009). “Evaluation and content analysis of secondary English textbooks using fog readability formula and teachers perspectives. Journal of Instruction and Evaluation. No. 7. Pp. 7-21[In Persian].
• Hosseini, S. M. H. (2007). “ELT in higher education in Iran and India: A critical view”. Language in India. 7.Pp. 1-11. Retrieved April 15, 2013, from http://www.languageinindia.com/dec2007/eltinindiaandiran.pdf
• Hutchinson, T. & A. Waters (1993). English for Specific Purposes: A learning-Centered Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Iraji, A. (2007). Pragmatic Features of New Interchange: How communicative and Task-Based it is, Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Shiraz, Iran: Shiraz University.
• Jafari Harandi, R.; A.R. Nasr & S.A. Jafari (2008). “Content analysis as a useful tool in social science studies with emphasis on textbooks content analysis”. Seminary& University Journal. Methodology of Social Science. Vol. 14, No, 55, Summer 2008. Pp. 33-58 [In Persian].
• Jahangard, A. (2007). “Evaluation of EFL materials taught at Iranian public high schools”. The Asian EFL Journal, 9(2).Pp. 130- 150.
• Janfeshan, K. & M. Nosrati (2014). “A quick look to English language training in Iranian guidance schools through “Prospect” method and CLT with a book analytic approach”. International Journal of Economy, Management, and Social Sciences, 3(1).Pp. 100–106.
• Jodaei, H. (2014). “Textbook Evaluation: A reflection on total English (Intermediate) ”. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming. 4. 2402-2409. 10.4304/tpls.4.11.Pp.2402-2409.
• Karimi, A. (2004). "An evaluation of a preparatory English course books 1&2: An EAP course book evaluation". ELT Journal, 73. Pp. 24-28.
• Khajavi Y. & R. Abbasian, (2011), “English language teaching, national identity and globalization in Iran: The case of public schools". International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(10),
• Kiany, Gh.; S. I. Mousavi & R. G. Samar, (2012), “The Relationship between personality traits and gender, and unwillingness to communicate in a foreign language”. Language Related Research. 2 (4) .Pp. 123-144 [In Persian].
• Kiany, Gh.; M. Momenian & H. Navidi Nia, (2010). “Revisiting the Approach of National Curriculum towards Foreign Language Education”. Language Related Research.2 (2). [In Persian].
• Kuruvilla, M. & K.T. Thasniya, (2015). “Gender stereotypism in the pictorial depictions of primary school text books. IOSR". Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 20(6).Pp: 16- 26.
• Lawrence, W. P. W. (2011). Textbook evaluation: a framework for evaluating the fitness of the Hong Kong new secondary school (NSS) curriculum. Dissertation for Master Program, City University of Hong Kong. Retrieved from http://www.asian-efl-journal.com/Thesis/Thesis-Wong.pdf on December 20, 2017.
• Lee, J. F. K. & P. Collins, (2008), “Gender voices in Hong Kong English textbooks some past and current practices”. Sex Roles, 59.
• Littlejohn, A. (1998). ‘The analysis of language teaching materials: Inside the Trojan Horse’. in B. Tomlinson (Ed), Materials Development in Language Teaching, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press .Pp.190-216.
• Litz, D. R. A. (2005). “Textbook evaluation and ELT management: A South Korean case study”. Asian EFL Journal. Retrieved November 12, 2012, from http://www.asian-efl-journal.com/Litz_thesis.pdf
• Mahdizade, A. H. (2005). “Content analysis of secondary English textbooks: presenting scientific framework for modification and edition”. Roshd Foreign Language Teaching Journal. 20. No. 77.Pp. 3-10 [In Persian].
• Mahmoodi, M. H. & M. Moradi, (2015), “Qualitative critique and evaluation of english for schools (Prospect 1) with an emphasis on foreign language teaching methodology”. Critical Studies in Texts and Programs of Human Sciences. Volume 15, Issue 36, 179-196.[In Persian]
• Mahmoodi, M.H. & M. Ahmadi Safa, (2014), A model-based evaluation of English for specific purposes (ESP) books. Critical Studies in Texts and Programs of Human Sciences. Volume 14, Issue 32. [In Persian].
• McDonough, J. & C. Shaw, (2003), Materials and Methods in ELT: A Teacher’s Guide (2nd ed). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
• McGrath, I. (2002). Materials Evaluation and Design for Language Teaching. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
• Miekley, J. (2005). “ESL textbook evaluation checklist”. The Reading Matrix Vol. 5, No. 2, September
• Mukundan, J.; Hajimohammadi, R. & V. Nimehchisalem, (2011). “Developing an English language textbook evaluation checklist”. Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 4(6).Pp 21-28.
• Mukundan, J.; R. Hajimohammadi & V. Nimehchisalem ,(2012), “Developing an English language textbook evaluation checklist: A focus group study". International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(12).Pp. 100-106.
• Najafi Pazeki, M. (2015). “Content analysis of Iranian high school English textbooks grade seven”. Paper presented at national Conference on language, Literature, and translation in education. Mibod Yazd. Mibod Branch, Islamic Azad University. Retrieved from https://www.civilica.com/Paper-ELLTE02-ELLTE02_053.html [In Persian].
• O'Neill, R. (1982) “'Why Use Textbooks?” ELT Journal, 36(2).Pp. 104-111.
• Rajabi S. & S. Ketabi, (2012), “Aspects of cultural elements in prominent English textbooks for EFL Setting”. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(4).
• Razi, A. (2009). “The criteria of university textbooks evaluation”. Sokhanen Samt. No 21, Spring 2009. Pp. 21-30 [In Persian].
• Razmjoo, A. (2007). “High schools or private institutes’ textbooks? Which fulfill communicative language teaching principles in the Iranian context? Asian EFL Journal. 9(4).Pp. 126-140.
• Riazi, A. M. & N. Mosalanejad (2010). “Evaluation of Learning Objectives in Iranian High-School and Pre-University English Textbooks Using Bloom’s Taxonomy”. TESL-EJ, 13(4), pp. 1-16.
• Riazi, A.M. (2003). “What textbook evaluation schemes tell us? A study of the textbook evaluation schemes of three decades”. In W.A. Renanda. (Ed).Methodology and materials design in language teaching (Pp. 52-68).Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Center.
• Rohani, A.; T. Azari & F. Moafian, (2013), Evaluation of Iranian high School English textbooks pictures: Functionality and Gender Bias. Linguistic Research in Foreign Languages. 4. 3 (1). Pp. 93.115 [In Persian].
• Roseni, Emilda, (2014), “Albanian Case: EnglishTextbook Evaluation in High Schools as Part of the English Curriculum”. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences MCSER Publishing. Vol 5 No 6 April, Rome-Italy
• Seifolahi, S. & M. Ebrahimi (2008). “The role of Women in Persian Textbooks”. Social Science Research Journal .Year 2, No.1, Spring [In Persian].
• Sheldon, L. E. (1988). Evaluating ELT textbooks and materials. ELT Journal. 42, 237-246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/42.4.237
• Shirvani, K. (2013).“ Comparative evaluation of Iranian english textbooks with language institutes English books from teachers perspectives”. Shahed University Research Quarterly. Year 20, Vol. 3 Teaching and learning researches [In Persian].
• Sumalatha, K. & D. Ramakrishnaiah, (2004), “Sex bias in secondary school social studies textbooks: A case study in india”. American Journal of Applied Science, 1(1).
• Taherkhani, R.; S.A. Afzali Mir Malmir; A. Montazeri & Z. Arash , (2017), The critical study of new iranian high school textbook grade 10 in national level. Critical Studies in Texts and Programs of Human Sciences. Year 17. No. 7. Pp. 77-91. [In Persian].
• Tomlinson, B. (2010). “Principles of effective materials development”. In N. Harwood (Ed.), English language teaching materials: Theory and practice (Pp. 81-98). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Toolabi, J. (2002). Characterization of Language Functions in the Iranian High School English Textbooks, Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Shiraz, Iran: Shiraz University.
• Tucker, C. A. (1975). “Evaluating beginning textbooks". English Teaching Forum, 13. Pp. 355-361.
• Ur, P. (1996). A Course in Language Teaching: Practice & theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Widdowson, H.G. (1983). Learning Purpose and Language Use. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Williams, D. (1983). “Developing criteria for textbook evaluation". ELT Journal. 37(3).Pp. 251-255.
• Yarmohammadi, L. (2002). The evaluation of pre-university textbooks. The Newsletter of the Iranian Academy of Science. 18. Pp. 70-87.
• Zare-Moayedi, I. (2007). An In-depth Evaluation of Interchange Series, 3rd ed., Unpublished Master's Thesis, Shiraz: Shiraz University.
• Zienalabedini, P. & M. Alavinia, (2016), “English textbook evaluation grade 7 based on Cisar and Basturkmen Model”. Critical Studies in Texts and Programs of Human Sciences. Vol. 36 [In Persian].