Aspect-based Verb in Tonekaboni Dialect

Author
Assistant Professor of General Linguistics - Islamic Azad University, Chalous Branch.
Abstract
The dialect of Tonekaboni differs from the dialects of the speakers in the East of Mazandaran and the West of Guilan where the native speakers of the three regions use Persian to communicate. During the implementation of a part of a research project and in order to find the reason for the lack of mutual understanding between the speakers of the east and west of Mazandaran and the difference between their dialects which both are taken into account as Mazandarani (Tabari) language, the author has concluded that the most important factor is the difference between the construction of their verbs due to the unusual stem in Tonekaboni verbs. The aim of this paper is to describe the verb stem and analyze its different structure in Tonekaboni dialect. In this research, a fieldwork for data gathering was applied through a targeted interview with 10 native speakers to obtain the different paradigms of verbs. The current study showed that verbs stems in this dialect were based on "aspect", while in most languages, like Iranian language family, the stems of verb are based on its tense (commonly present and past), to which inflectional affixes – including aspect of the verb – are attached. This study on one hand, introduces the distinctive feature of aspect -based stems in Tonekaboni, the most widely-used dialect of one of the Caspian language group, which is in decline; and on the other hand it may be useful for dialectology, typology and sociolinguistic studies.

Keywords

Subjects


• Agha-Golzadeh, F. (2005). “Some phonological changes and active phonological processes in Mazandarani dialect”. Dialogology: Supplement to the Academy. Vol. 1. No. 3. Pp: 4 -12. [In Persian].
• Amouzadeh, M. (2002). “Convergence and diglossia in Mazandarani dialect”. Humanities and Social Sciences Researches (Mazandaran University). No. 6 & 7. Pp: 139-160. [In Persian].
• Aronoff, M. (2012). "Morphological stems: what William of Ockham really said". Word Structure 5. Pp: 28-51.
• Bazin, M. (2014). “GĪLĀN”, Encyclopedia Iranica, X/VI, 617-25; retrieved from http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles-x.
• Beekes, R.S.P. (1995). Comparative Indo-European Linguistics. Amesterdam/ Phildelphia: John Benjamins.
• Bergs, A. (2012). English Historical Linguistics, Gruiter Mouton.
• Bhat, D.N.S. (1999). The Prominence of Tense, Aspect and Mood. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• Binnick, R.I. (2006). “Aspect and Aspectuality”. In B. Aarts & A. M. S. McMahon (Eds.), The Handbook of English Linguistics (Pp: 244–268). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
• Borjian, H. (2005). “Verb identifiers in eastern Mazandaran”. Dialogology: Supplement to the Academy. Vol. 1. No. 3. Pp: 13-19. [In Persian].
• Campbell, L. (1998). Historical Linguistics. MIT Press.
• Christensen, A. E. (1994). Gilaki Dialect of Rasht. J. Khomamizadeh, Tehran: Soroush.
• Crystal, D. (1985). A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. 2nd edition. New York: Basil Blackwell.
• Crystal, D. (1992). An Encyclopedic Dictionary of Language and Languages. Oxford: Basill and Blackwell.
• Darzi, A. & M. Danaye Tousi (2015). “Impersonal Construction in Gilaki of Lahijan County”. Dialogology: Supplement to the Academy. Vol. 1, No. 2.Pp: 17-36. [In Persian].
• Embick, D. & R. Noyer (2007). “Distributed Morphology and the syntax/morphology interface”. In The Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces,ed. Gillian Ramchand and Charles Reiss.Pp: 289–324. Oxford University Press.
• Embick, D. & A. Marantz (2008). “Architecture and blocking”. Linguistic Inquiry 39:1.Pp: 1-53.
• Friedrich, P. (1974). “On aspect theory and homeric aspect”, International Journal of American Linguistics. Memoir 28, S1-S44.
• Hasani, AR. Sh. & M.A. Adelifar (2014). “Survey on the linguistic diversity of gilaki in Rasht and Sowme'eh Sara”. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods. Vol. 4. No. 3.
• Hyman, L.M. (2001). “The limits of phonetic determinism in phonology: *NC revisited”. In: Hume, Johnson (Eds.), The role of speech perception in phonology. New York Academic Press. Pp: 141-185.
• Jahangiri, N. (2003). “Gilaki dialect of Lahijan: a study on phonology, morphology & lexicon”, Research Institute for Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa. Vol. 3.
• Kalbasi, I. (1997). Guyeš-e Kelardasht “Roudbarak” (The Kelardasht Dialect of Roudbarak). Tehran: Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies. [In Persian].
• Kalin, L. (2015). Aspects of the Indo-Iranian "Stem" (laura.kalin@gmail.com), UConn in collaboration with Ümit Atlamaz, Rutgers)Workshop on Aspect — Cornell University).
• Leech, G. (1971). Meaning and the English Verb. London: Longman.
• Lieber, R. (2009). Introducing Morphology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Mish, F. [editor] (1991).Webster's Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary. Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster.
• Moeini Sam, B. (2013). “The relict of the ancient "Aorist" stems (with "S") in the New Persian”. Journal of Language researches (JLR) of Alzahra University. No. 9. Pp: 177-198. [In Persian].
• Momeni, F. (2015). An Analytic Grammar of Persian Language: A Linguistics-based Approach, Tehran: Siyahroud. [In Persian].
• Momeni, F. (1994). A linguistic survey of the northern part of central Alborz by presenting a linguistic atlas and comparing it with neighboring dialects. M.A Thesis in General Linguistics. University of Tehran. [In Persian].
• Momeni, F. (2003). “The structure of the verb in Tonekaboni dialect”, Journal of Linguistics. Issue 18. No. 1 (35).Pp: 101-115. [In Persian].
• Myers, S. (2002). Gaps in factorial typology: The case of voicing in consonant clusters. Ms., University of Texas at Austin. [ROA 509.]
Najafian, A.; T. Mosavi Miangah; B. Rovshan; S. Mollaye Pashayei (2016). “Dialectometric recognition of Mazandarani language varieties: Linguistic and geographic pattern located off the Gorgan Golf through central Mazandaran”. Language Related Research. 7(5).Pp: 445-469. [In Persian].
• Palmer, F.R. (1971). Grammar. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
• Quirk, R.; S. Greenbaum; G. Leech; J. Svartvik, (1985), A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. Harlow: Longman.
• Radford, A. (1997). Syntax: A Minimalist Introduction, Cambridge University Press.
• Rastorgueva V.S. et al. (2012). The Gilaki Language. English translation editing and extended content by Ronald M. Lockwood, Uppsala University.
• Rezapour, E. (2015). “Scrambling in Mazandarani Dialect”. Language Related Research. Jan- Vol. 7 Issue 6 (21). Pp: 95-115. [In Persian].
• Samareh, Y. (1989). “Structural analysis of the verbs in Gilaki of Kelardashti dialect”. Journal of the Literature and Human Sciences of Tehran University. 26. Pp: 169-178. [In Persian].
• Shokri, G. (1995). Guyeš-e sāri (The Sari Dialect). Tehran: Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies. [In Persian].
• Windfuhr, G. (2009). The Iranian Languages. London: Routledge.