Characteristics and strategies for women's sports from the perspective of Semiotics

Authors
M. youssefi sadeghloo 1
A. saleh bolourdi 2
1 Ph.D. in Law, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran
2 Assistant Professor of Semiotics, Research Center, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Semiotics of the human environment is better known to us. The human environment is the world in which we live and we need to adapt to it. This article tries to scrutinize the conditions and the human environment in women's sports activities. Questions that are posed include: What is the body-language in women's sports, and how the interaction of the biological and cultural system creates and develops a discourse in society? Are signs of the body linguistic and make sense? What role do cultural requirements and implications play? Our hypothesis is that one cannot never rely on cultural requirements and advance decision-making discourse by judging, but it is necessary that these questions be able to persuade the public. Therefore, the first set of biological factors and its extension to the set of cultural factors of the semiotic environment are evoked, then we approach the role of sportive, cultural discourses and even pro-enunciations. In this article, we will try to better understand the semiotic nature of the action, the actors, the roles and the functions, as well as object of the value or the exercise of the object. But the great attention should be paid to sensory and axiological affairs whose absence can lead to a theatrical scene in women's sport. We will therefore shed light on the layer of the power and the need for legal support and the media in sport.

Keywords

Subjects

• Alonso J. et D. Bertrand (2014). Figures et formes de la normalité (Dossier de recherche en sémiotique de l’Ecole de la Communication de SciencesPo-Paris), sommaire: http://semiotique.hypotheses.org/148. Du corps normalisé aux normalités sociales.
• Berthelot J.-M. (1985). (en collaboration avec S. Clément, M. Drule, J. Forné, G. Mbodj), "Les sociologies et le corps". in Currentsociology. Vol. 33, no 2.
• Bohm J.-M. (2001). Le corps analyseur. Paris :Anthropos :Economica.
• Bourdieu, P. (1987). La distinction. Paris: Editions de Minuit.
• Bourdieu, P. (1998). La domination masculine, Paris : Le Seuil. Bourdieu Pierre, "A propos de La domination masculine". Agone. 2003, no 28, propos recueillis par Isabelle Rüf, pour la Radio Suisse Romande, en janvier 1999. Bourdieu Pierre, « Remarques provisoires sur la perception sociale du corps », Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, no 14, avr. 1977. Castellana Marcello, « l’émoi envahissant et le sang-froid », Le Portique, no 17, 2006. Denis Paul, « Corps et langage », in Psychanalyste, S.P.P., n° 112, 2006, pp 47-52.Castellana Marcello, « l’émoi envahissant et le sang-froid », Le Portique, no 17, 2006.
• Changeux, J-P. (1993). Fondements naturels de l'éthique. Odile Jacob, Paris.
• Denis, P. (2006). "Corps et langage". in Psychanalyste. S.P.P., n° 112, Pp: 47-52.
• Detrez, Ch. & M. Darmon (2004). Corps et société, Paris: La Documentation Française. Foucault Michel, "Sexualité et politique". 1974, DE, II, no 138.
• Goffman, E. (1973). La mise en scène de la vie quotidienne. Vol. 2. Les relations en public. Paris: Minuit.
• Lamizet, B. (2000). La médiation culturelle. Paris: l’Harmattan.
• Landowski, E. (1989). La société réfléchie, Paris: Seuil.
• Leveratto, J.-M. (2006). "Lire Mauss. L’authentification des" Techniques du corps" et ses enjeux méthodologiques". Le Portique. no 17, 1er semestre, pp 39-61.
• Rastier, F. (1991). Sémantique et recherches cognitives. Paris: Presses universitaires de France
• Alonso J. & D. Bertrand (2014). Figures and forms of normality (Semiotic research file of SciencesPo-Paris School of Communication), summary: retrieved from http://semiotique.hypotheses.org/148. From the normalized body to social normalities. [In French].
• Berthelot J.-M. (1985). (in collaboration with S. Clément, M. Drule, J. Forné, G. Mbodj). “Sociologies and the body”. In Currentsociology. Vol. 33. No. 2. [In French].
• Bohm J.-M. (2001). The Analyzer Body, Paris: Anthropos: Economica. [In French].
• Bourdieu, P. (1987). The Distinction. Paris: Editions de Minuit. [In French].
• Bourdieu, P. (1998). The male domination. Paris: The Threshold. Bourdieu Pierre, “About Male Domination”, Agone, 2003, No. 28, by Isabelle Rüf, for Radio Suisse Romande, in January 1999. Bourdieu Pierre, “Preliminary remarks on the social perception of the body”, Proceedings of Social Science Research, No. 14, Apr. 1977. Castellana Marcello, "Invading Emotion and Cold-bloodedness," Le Porttique, No. 17, 2006. Denis Paul, “Body and Language,” in Psychoanalyst, SPP, n ° 112, 2006, Pp: 47-52. Castellana Marcello, “invading emotion and composure”, Le Porttique, No. 17, 2006. [In French].
• Changeux, J.-P. (1993). Natural Foundations of Ethics. Odile Jacob, Paris. • Denis Paul, “Body and language” in Psychoanalyst, S.P.P., No. 112, 2006. Pp :47-52. [In French].
• Detrez Ch. & M. Darmon (2004). Body and Society. Paris: The French Documentation. Foucault Michel, “Sexuality and Politics”. 1974. DE, II, No. 138. [In French].
• Goffman, E. (1973). The Staging of Everyday Life. Flight. 2. Relations in Public, Paris, Midnight. [In French].
• Lamizet, B. (2000). Cultural Mediation. Paris: Harmattan. [In French].
• Landowski, E. (1989). The Reflected Society. Paris: Seuil. [In French].
• Leveratto J.-M. (2006). “Read Mauss. Authentication of the Techniques of the body" and its methodological stakes ”. Le Porttique. No. 17. 1st semester. Pp: 39-61. [In French].
• Rastier, F. (1991). Semantics and Cognitive Research. Paris : Presses universitaires de France. [In French].
Language Related Research
Volume 10, Issue 1 - Serial Number 49
March and April 2019
Pages 51-72