Linguistic Relativity & Discourse in Autobiography from the Viewpoint of Postmodernism

Authors
M. Ghaemi 1
F. Sojoodi 2
1 PhD in Art Research – Azad University – Science and Research Branch-Tehran-Iran
2 Associate Professor of Dramatic Art – Tehran University- Iran.
Abstract
When a text is comprehended in a familiar context and enjoys a coherent whole, it is called a discourse. Reading a discourse is owed to linguistic knowledge and non-linguistic cognition. As a narrative, an autobiography has its textual world. Its reality is a result of the method used for linguistic coding. Through the linguistic relativity on the part of the author, the self and the world are actively constructed. Through an analysis of linguistic domain in autobiography, for denotative meaning and connotative meanings, the author’s worldview is known. The subject in autobiography is moving from one experience to another. It is placed on a continuum of language, adopting multiple positions arisen from connotative utterances. Performance of this self has become a postmodern norm. We should ask about the relation between language and reality in autobiography, and about aspects of cultural identity of the self-represented. This article attempts to say that in our reading of a postmodern subject in the center of autobiography, in view of language as a medium for expression, and meta-language as a language to explain the language used to represent the self, how the multiple “self” & “others” arisen from such texts could be realized in language and participate in various discourses.

Keywords

Subjects

• Ashley, C.; Leigh Gilmore & Gerald N. Peters, Eds. (1994). Autobiography and Postmodernism. Ed. USA: University of Massachusetts.
• Bakhtin, M.M. (1981). The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Trans. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin: U. of Texas P.
• Barthes, R. (1977). Roland Barthes. Trans. Richard Howard. New York: Noonday.
• Beneviste, E. (1971). Problems in General Linguistics. Trans. Mary Elizabeth Meek. Coral Gables: U of Miami P.
• Bergland, B. (1994). “Postmodernism and the Autobiographical Subject: Reconstructing the “Other”.” Autobiography & Postmodernism. Ed. Kathleen Ashley, Leigh Gilmore & Gerald Peters. Boston: U of Massachusetts.
• Fischer, M. M.J. (1994). “Autobiographical voices and mosaic memory”. Autobiography & Postmodernism. Ed. Kathleen Ashley, Leigh Gilmore & Gerald Peters. Boston: U of Massachusetts,.
• Gates, J. L. Jr. (1988). “James Gronniosaw and the trope of the talking book.” Studies in Autobiography. Ed. James. Olney. New York: Oxford UP.
• Gilmore, L. (1994). “The mark of autobiography: postmodernism, autobiography and genra”. Autobiography & Postmodernism. Ed. Kathleen Ashley, Leigh Gilmore & Gerald Peters. Boston: U of Massachusetts.
• Smith. P. (1988). Discerning the Subject. Mineapolis: U of Minnesota P,.
• Smith. P.(1987). A Poetics of Woman’s Autobiography: Marginality and the Fictions of Self-Representation. Bloomington: Indiana UP.
Language Related Research
Volume 10, Issue 1 - Serial Number 49
March and April 2019
Pages 149-169