بررسی ارتباط بین ابعاد ویژگی شخصیتی با مهارت نوشتاری ( دقت و روایی) زبان‌آموزان سطح متوسط با میانجیگری انگیزش

نوع مقاله : علمی پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری آموزش زبان انگلیسی، گروه زبان انگلیسی و زبان‌شناسی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد اهر، اهر، ایران.
2 استادیار آموزش زبان انگلیسی، گروه زبان انگلیسی و زبان‌شناسی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد اهر، اهر، ایران
چکیده
با توجه به اهمیت مهارت نوشتاری در تسلط بر زبان انگلیسی و در نظر گرفتن مهارت نوشتاری به­عنوان چالش­برانگیزترین مهارت یادگیریِ زبان، تحقیق حاضر به بررسی روابط بین ویژگی‌های شخصیتی با انگیزش و مهارت نوشتاری در زبان­آموزان می‌پردازد. هدف اصلی این مطالعه، بررسی برازش مناسب مدل روابط بین مؤلفه‌های ویژگی شخصیتی و مهارت نوشتاری زبان­آموزان با میانجگری انگیزش است. بدین منظور، 120 زبان­آموز از بین جامعۀ آماری در سطح متوسط، در رشته‌های آموزش، ادبیات و مترجمی انگلیسی در این تحقیق انتخاب شدند. داده‌ها از طریق پرسش­نامۀ 5 ویژگی بزرگ شخصیتی جان وسریواستاوا(1999) ، آزمون نگرش/ انگیزش گاردنر (2004) و آزمون زمان­بندی شدۀ نوشتاری به­دست آمد. نتایج تحلیل مسیر نشان داد، بین ابعاد ویژگی‌های شخصیتی با انگیزش و مهارت نوشتاری زبان­آموزان رابطه وجود دارد و مؤلفه‌های برون­گرایی، وجدان و توافق­پذیری به­طور غیر­مستقیم تأثیر مثبت و معنی­داری بر مهارت نوشتاری زبان­آمو زان دارند و مؤلفۀ روان­رنجوری نیز به­طور غیر­مستقیم تأثیر منفی و معنی­داری بر مهارت نوشتاری زبان­آموزان دارد. همچنین، مشخص شد انگیزش زبان­آموزان روابط بین ویژگی‌های شخصیتی با مهارت نوشتاری آنان را به­طور نسبی میانجیگری می‌کند. در نهایت، نتایج این مطالعه می‌تواند چشم‌انداز بسیار روشنی برای برنامه‌ریزان و مربیان دوره‌های آموزشیِ مهارت‌های نگارش در توجه بیشتر به متغیرهای نگرشی و غیر­شناختی، مانند صفات شخصیتی و انگیزش زبان­آموزان در کلاس­های آموزش زبان انگلیسی داشته باشد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

The Relationship between Intermediate EFL learners’ Personality Trait Dimensions with Motivation and Their Writing Performance (accuracy, fluency)

نویسندگان English

Fereshteh Asadzadian 1
masoud zoghi 2
nader asadi 2
1 Ph.D. Candidate in English Language Teaching – Department of English Language and Linguistics -Islamic Azad University – Ahar Branch – Ahar –Iran.
2 Assistant Professor of English Language Teaching – Department of English Language and Linguistics- Islamic Azad University – Ahar Branch – Ahar –Iran.
چکیده English

Regarding the importance of writing performance in mastering English language and considering writing as the most challenging language learning skill, the present study examined the relationship between personality traits with motivation and written performance in learners. The main purpose of this study was to examine the model fitness of the relationship between the personality traits and writing performance of learners with motivation mediation. To this end, one hundred twenty participants were selected from intermediate EFL (teaching, literature, translation) learners. Data were collected through Big Five Personality Traits questionnaire (John and Srivastava, 1999), Attitude/Motivation Test Battery (AMTB) (Gardner, 2004) and a timed writing Test. The results of the path analysis indicated a relationship between personality trait dimensions with motivation and EFL writing performance. Also extroversion, consciousness, and agreeableness indirectly had a positive and significant effect on writing performance. Learners’ motivation relatively intercedes the relationship between personality traits and writing. Finally, the findings of the study are discussed in relation to effective attitudinal variables and non-cognitive variables of personality traits for educational planners, writing courses teachers, and EFL learners’ motivation in language classrooms.


کلیدواژه‌ها English

Keywords: Writing performance
Personality Traits
Motivation
Anani Sarab, M. R. & Amini Farsani, M. (2014). The relationship between writing strategies and personality types of graduate Iranian EFL learners. Applied Research on English Language, 3(2), 69-83.
Baker, C. (2001). Foundations of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism (3rd ed.). Clevendon, UK: Multilingual Matters LTD.
Binder, C., Haughton, E. & Bateman, B. (2002). Fluency: Achieving true mastery in the learning process. Retrieved from http://speical.edschool.viginia.edu/papers.
Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching. (4th ed). USA: Prentice-hall.
Brown, H. D. (1990). M & Ms for language classrooms? Another look at motivation. In J. E.
Callahan, S. (2000). Responding to the invisible student. Assessing Writing, 7, 57-77.
Cheng, H-F. & Dornyei, Z. (2007). The use of motivational strategies in language instruction: the case of EFL teaching in Taiwan. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 153-174.
Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human
behavior. New York: Plenum.
Dornyei, Z. (2000). Motivation in action: Towards a process-oriented conceptualization of student motivation. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 519-538.
Dornyei, Z. (2001). Teaching and Researching Motivation. Harlow, England: Pearson Education.
Dörnyei, Z. (2003). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and processing. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The Psychology of the Language Learner: Individual Differences in Second Language Acquisition. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Dörnyei, Z. & Csizer, K. (2002). Motivational dynamics in second language acquisition: Results of a longitudinal nationwide survey. Applied Linguistics, 23, 421-462.
Dörnyei, Z. & Otto, I. (1998). Motivation in action: A process model of L2 motivation. Working Papers in Applied Linguistics (Thames Valley University, London), 4, 43-69.
Ebata, M. (2008). Motivation factors in language learning. The Internet TESL Journal, 14(4). Retrieved from http://iteslj.org/Articles/Ebata-motivationfactors.html.
Ellis, R. (1985). Understanding Second Language Acquisition. Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R. (2004). Individual differences in second language learning. In A. Davis & C. Elder (Eds.). The handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 525-551). Oxford: Blackwell.
Ely, C. M. (1986). Language learning motivation: A descriptive and causal analysis. Modern Language Journal, 70, 28-35.
Hurtz, G. M., & Donovan, J. J. (2000). Personality and job performance: The Big Five revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 869–879.
Gardner, R. C. (1983). Learning another language: A true social psychological experiment. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 2, 219-239.
Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. London: Edward Arnold.
Gardner, R.C. (2001). Language learning motivation: the student, the teacher and the researcher. Key-note address to the Texas Foreign Language Education Conference, University of Texas, Austin.
Gardner, R. C. (2004). Attitude Motivation Test Battery: International AMTB Research Project. Canada: The University of Western Ontario. Retrieved February 9, 2008, from http://publish.uwo.ca/~gardner/docs/englishamtb.pdf
Gardner, R.C. (2006). The Socio-Educational Model of second language acquisition: A research paradigm. EUROSLA Yearbook, 6, 237-260.
Gardner, R. C. & MacIntyre, P. D. (1991). An instrumental motivation in language study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 57-72.
Gardner, R. C. Paul F .Trembely, Anne-Marie,Masgoret.(1997). Towards a Full Model of
Second Language Learning: An Empirical Investigation, The Modern LanguageJournal, 81, 344-362.
Griffiths, C. (2008). Strategies and good language learners. In C. Griffiths (Ed.), Lessons from good language learners (pp. 83-98). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gan, Z. (2011). An investigation of personality and L2 oral performance. Journal of Language Teaching andResearch, 2 (6), 1259-1267. http://dx.doi.org/10.4304/jltr.2.6.1259-1267
Gupta, D. & Wolemariam, G. S. (2011). The influence of motivation and attitude on writing strategy use of undergraduate EFL students: Quantitative and qualitative perspectives. Asian EFL Journal, 13(2), 34-89.
Hollenbeck, J. R., & Brief, A. P. (1987). The effects of individual differences and goal origin on goal setting and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 40,392–414.
Hollenbeck, J. R. (1987). Goal commitment and the goal-setting process: Problems, prospects, and proposals for future research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 215–220.
Hyland, K. (2003). Second Language Writing. C.U.P.
Kroll, B. (1990). Second Language Writing (Cambridge Applied Linguistics): Research Insights for the Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big-Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and
theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (Vol. 2, pp. 102–138). New York: Guilford Press.
Judge, Timothy A. Ilies , Remus .(2002) , Relationship of Personality to Performance Motivation: A Meta-Analytic Review, Journal of Applied Psychology , Vol. 87, No. 4, 797–807.
Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American psychologist,41(9): 954.
Marefat, F. (2006). Student writing, personality type of the student and the rater: any interrelationship? The Reading Matrix, 6(2), 116-124.
Mohammadi Dalari, Z. & Moinzadeh, S.N. (2014). The relationship between Iranian EFL learners' assertiveness and their writing ability. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 6(3), 298-306.
Myers, I.B., & Myers, P.B. (1980). Gifts differing. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists.
Noels, K. A. (2001). Learning Spanish as a second language: Learners' orientations and perceptions of their teachers' communication style. Language learning, 51(1), 107-144.
Noels, K. A. Pelletier, L. G. & vallerand, R. J. (2000). Why are you learning a second
language? Motivational orientations and self-determinations theory. Language
Learning. 50. 1. 57-85.
Oram, P. & Harrington, M. (2002). Learning styles and strategies, SLAT 6805. Second
language Aqusition. semester 2.
Oxford, R., Shearin, J. (1994). Language learning motivation: Expanding the theoretical framework. The modern language journal, 78(1): 12-28.
Reiss, M. (1985). The good language learner: Another look. Canadian Modern Language Review, 41, 511-523.
Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. (2000a). Intrinsic and Extrinsic motivations: classic
definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 25. 54-67
Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L (2000b). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of
intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist. 55.
1. 68-78
Shahravanmehr, Kh. (2010). The Relationship between Introversion and Extroversion and Writing Ability among Iranian EFL Learners in Payam Noor University. Unpublished master of art dissertation.
Strong, M. (1986). Integrative motivation: Cause or result of successful second language acquisition. Language Learning, 1, 1-14.
Saucier, G., & Ostendorf, F. (1999). Hierarchical subcomponents of the Big Five personality factors: A cross-language replication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 613–627.
Tremblay, P. F., & Gardner, R. C. (1995). Expanding the motivation construct in language learning. Modern Language Journal, 79, 505–518.
.
Wilz, B. (2000). Relationship between Personality Type and Graded Point Average of Technical College Students. Unpublished MA thesis, University of Wisconsin-Stout.
Zhou, D. (2015). "An empirical study on the application of process approach in
Non-English majors'writing". English Language Teaching. No. 8(3), Pp. 89-96.