تأثیر بار درگیری ذهنی بر میزان یادسپاری عبارت‌های اصطلاحی از سوی فراگیران زبان انگلیسی

• Anderson, M. C., & Spellman, B. A. (1995). “On the status of inhibitory mechanisms in cognition: Memory retrieval as a model case”. Psychological Review, 102(1), Pp. 68-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.102.1.68
• Baddeley, A. (1997). Human memory: Theory and Practice. Hove, UK: Psychology pess.
• Bagheri, M. S., &Fazel, I. (2010). “Effects of Etymological Elaboration on the EFL Learners' Comprehension and Retention of Idioms”. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 14(1), Pp. 45-55.
• Craik, F. I., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). “Levels of processing: A framework for memory research”. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11(1), Pp. 671-684.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80001-X
• Craik, F. I., & Tulving, E. (1975). “Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory”. Journal of Experimentl Psychology: General, 104(3), Pp. 268-294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.268
• Crookes, G., & Schmidt, R. W. (1991). “Motivation: Reopening the research agenda”. Language learning, 41(4), Pp. 469-512. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1991.tb00690.x
• De la Fuente, M. J. (2006). “Classroom L2 vocabulary acquisition: Investigating the role of pedagogical tasks and form-focused instruction”. Language Teaching Research, 10(3), Pp. 263-295.https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168806lr196oa
• Dörnyei, Z. (1994). “Motivation and motivating in the foreign language classroom”. The modern language journal, 78(3), Pp. 273-284.doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1994.tb02042.x
• Ebbinghaus, H. (1964). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology. NewYork: Dover. doi: 10.5214/ans.0972.7531.200408
• Ellis , R., & He , X. (1999). “The roles of modified input and output in the incidental acquisition of word meanings”. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(2), Pp. 285-301.doi:10.5214/ans.0972.7531.200408
• Ellis, R., Tanaka, Y., & Yamazaki, A. (1994). “Classroom interaction, comprehension, and the acquisition of L2 word meanings”. Language Learning , 44(3), Pp. 449-491.DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1994.tb01114.x
• Evens, S., & Green, C. (2007). “Why EAP is necessary: A survey of Hong Kong tertiary students”. Journal of English For Academic Purposes, 6(1), Pp. 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2006.11.005
• Eysenck, H. J. (1982). “Incidental learning in orienting tasks”. in R. C. Puff, Handbook of Research Methods In Human Memory and Cognition (Pp. 197-228). NewYork: Academic Press.
• Eysenck, M. W., & Eysenck, M. C. (1979). “Memory scanning, introversion-extraversion, and levels of processing”. Journal of Research in Personality, 13(3), Pp. 305-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(79)90021-7
• Fernández, M. (2007). “Revisiting the involvement load hypothesis:Awareness, type of task and type of item”. Selected Proceedings of the 2007 Second Language Research Forum (Pp. 210-229). Massachusetts: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
• Gardner, R. C., & Lambert, W. E. (1972). Attitudes and Motivation in Second-Language Learning. Chicago. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1991.tb00690.x
• Gardner, R. C., Lalonde, R. N., & Moorcroft, R. (1985). “The role of attitudes and motivation in second language learning: Correlational and experimental considerations”. Language learning, 35(2), Pp. 207-227. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1985.tb01025.x
• Gardner, R. C., & MacIntyre, P. D. (1991). “An instrumental motivation in language study”. Studies in second language acquisition, 13(1), Pp. 57-72. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100009724
• Gairns, R., & Redman, S. (2011). Idioms and Phrasal Verbs: Intermediate. Oxford University Press.
• Hulstijn, J. H., & Laufer, B. (2001). “Some emprical evidence for the involvement load hypothesis in vocabulary acquistion.” Langugae Learning, 51(3), Pp. 539-558. doi: 10.1111/0023-8333.00164
• Hu, M. & Nassaji, H. (2012). “The relationship beteen task-induced involvement load and larning words from context.” International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRAL), 5, Pp. 69-86.
• Hu, M. & Nassaji, H. (2016). “Effective vocabulary learning tasks: Invlvement Load Hypothesis versus Technique Feature Analysis.” System, 56, Pp. 28-39.
• Izumi, S. (2002). “Output, input enhancement, and the noticing hypothesis.” Studies in second language acquisition, 24(4), Pp. 541-577. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263102004023
• James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York: Holt.
• Jing, L. & Jianbin, H. (2009). “An empirical study of the Involvement Load Hypothesis in incedental vocabulary acquisition in EFL listening.” Polyglossia, 16, Pp. 1-11.
• Keating, G. D. (2008). “Task effectiveness and word learning in a second language: The involvement load hypothesis on trial.” Language Teaching Research, 12(3), Pp. 365-386. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168808089922
• Kim, Y. J. (2008). “The role of task-induced involvement and learner proficiency in L2 vocabulary acquisition.” Language Learning, 58(2), Pp. 285-325.
• Keller, J. M. (1983). “Motivational design of instruction.” Instructional design theories and models: An overview of their current status, 1(1983), Pp. 383-434.
• Krashen, S. (1989 ). “We acquire vocabulary and spelling by reading: Additional evidence for the input hypothesis.” The Modern Language Journal, 73(4), Pp. 440-464. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1989.tb05325.x
• Landy, F. J. (1989). Psychology of work behavior. Thomson Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.
• Laufer, B., & Hulstijn, J. (2001). “Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second langugae: The construct of task-induced involvement.” Applied linguistics, 22(1), Pp. 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.1.1
• Lu, J., & Huang, J. (2009). “An empirical study of the involvement load hypothesis in incidental vocabulary acquisition in EFL listening.” Polyglossia, 16, Pp. 2-11.
• Maftoon, P., & Sharifi Haratmeh, M. (2012). “The relative effectiveness of input and output-oriented tasks with different involvement loads on the receptive and productive vocabulary knowledge of iranian EFL learners.” Journal of Teaching Languge Skills, 31(2), Pp. 27-52. doi: 10.22099/JTLS.2012.497
• McLaughlin, B. (1965). “‘Intentional’ and ‘incidental’ learning in human subjects: The role of instructions to learn and motivation.” Psychological Bulletin, 63(5), P. 359. http://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/h0021759
• Nelson, T. O. (1977). “Repetition and depth of processing.” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16(2), Pp. 151-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(77)80044-3
• Newton, J. (1995). “Task-based interaction and incidental vocabulary learning: A case study.” Second Language Research, 11(2), Pp. 77-159. https://doi.org/10.1177/026765839501100207
• Oxford, R., & Shearin, J. (1994). “Language learning motivation: Expanding the theoretical framework.” The Modern Language Journal, 78(1), Pp. 12-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1994.tb02011.x
• Peters, E. (2012). “The differential effects of two vocabulary instruction methods on EFL word learning: A study into task effectivenes.” International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 50(3), Pp. 213-238.
• Postman, L. (1964). “Studies of learning to learn II: Changes in transfer as a function of practice.” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 3(5), Pp. 437-447. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(64)80014-1
• Reuterskiöld, C., & Van Lancker Sidtis, D. (2013). “Retention of idioms following one-time exposure.” Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 29(2), Pp. 219-231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265659012456859
• Sarbazi, M. R. (2014). “Involvement load hypothesis: Recalling unfamiliar words meaning by adults across genders.” Procedia- Social and Behavioral Science, 98(6), Pp. 1686-1692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.594
• Shiri, M. & Hejazi, N. (2019). “Investigating the evolution of terminological theories: From lexical turns in GTT to metamorphosis of frame-based terminological units.” Language Related Research, 9(6), Pp. 93-121.
• Skehan, P. (1991). “Individual differences in second language learning.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13(2), Pp. 275-298. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100009979
• Swain, M. (2005). “The output hypothesis: theory and research.” In E. Heinkel (Ed), Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning (Pp.471-483). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Toth, P. D. (2006). “Processing instruction and a role for output in second language acquisition.” Language Learning, 56(2), Pp. 319-385. doi: 10.1111/j.0023- 33.2006.00349.x
• Waring, R., & Tataki, M. (2003). “At what rate do learners learn and retain new vocabulary.” Reading in a Foriegn Langugae, 15(2), Pp. 130-162.
• Yaqubi, B., Rayati, R., & Gorgi, A. (2010). “Involvemnt load hypothesis and vocabulary learning: The effect of task types and involvment load index on L2 vocabulary acquisition.” Journal of Teaching Langugae Skills, 29(1), Pp. 145-163. doi: 10.22099/JTLS.2012.404