Separability of Derivational Phase Edge in a Persian Compound Verb

Document Type : مقالات علمی پژوهشی

Authors
S. M. Hosseini-Maasoum 1
A. Najafian 1
B. Rovshan 2
B. Rovshan 2
R. Heidarizadi 3
1 Associate Professor, Department of Linguistics & Foreign Languages, Payam-e Noor University, Tehran, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of Linguistics & Foreign Languages, Payam-e Noor University, Tehran, Iran.
3 Assistant Professor, Encyclopedia of the World of Islam
Abstract
Compound verbs in Persian are verb constructions formed by more than one simple lexeme. For example, negah kardan (literally “watch do”) is a compound verb made of a nonverbal element negah (watch) and a light verb kard-an (to do). Syntactically, they are heads which can split during sentence derivation. The light verb kard-an, merged with a nonverbal element, comprises a compound verb and it cannot determine argument and transitivity of a verb alone. If such compound verbs are lexical words, then they should not split in the sentence structure by syntactic operations. On the other hand, if they are syntactic constructions then forming a new lexeme after syntax floats some theoretical conditions. The purpose of this paper is to describe the derivational steps of one type of compound verbs and explain how it is separable in syntax. Some of the data are selected from Sokhan Dictionary and some other (used in the sentence structure) from the online version of the Persian Linguistic Database (PLDB). The results indicated that Persian compound verbs are morphological phases the edge of which is visible and accessible to syntactic operations. First, the roots negah and kard enter merging, and after merging of a phase head involving [Tense] feature (usually, a light verb category), the root kard adjoins it to obtain the [Tense] feature. Finally, if root negah remains at the phase domain (under the phase head) it should transfer to the interface levels and become inaccessible to the moved kard at the phase edge. Therefore, negah should move to the phase edge; otherwise; kard and negah should be interpreted in two different phases and could not join to form a compound verb. That is, negah is also absorbed to Spec-phase by the [EPP] feature of the phase head. Now, both of them are regarded as a compound verb and the nonverbal element at the phase edge is accessible to the syntactic operations. Hence, it can split in syntax (for more details, see Heidarizadi, et al, 2017). Finally, following Johnson (2003) a syntactic operation called "renumeration" is introduced which targets the nonverbal element at the morphological phase edge and splits it, hence leads to its separability in syntax as the derivation proceeds.


Keywords

Subjects

Anderson, S. R. (1992). A-morphous morpholoy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Barjasteh, D. (1983). Morphology, syntax, and semantics of Persian compound verbs: A lexicalist approach. Unpublished Ph.D Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Borer, H. (2013). “The syntactic domain of content”. In G. J. Rothman J, Becker M, Schwartz B et al. (Ed.), Generative Linguistics and Acquisition: Studies in honor of Nina M. Hyams. pp. 205-248.
Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program (Vol. 1765): Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
---------------- (2000). “Minimalist inquiries: The framework”. In R. A. Martin, David Michaels, and Juan Uriagereka (Ed.). Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik (pp. 89-155).
Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
---------------- (2001). “Derivation by phase”. In K. L. Hale, and Michael J. Kenstowicz (Ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language (pp. 1-52). Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
---------------- (2008). “On phases”. In C. P. O. Robert Freidin, Maria Luisa Zubizarreta (Ed.), Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory: Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud (pp. 133-166).
Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
---------------- (2013). “Problems of projection”. Lingua, 130, 33-49.
---------------- (2015). Problems of projection: Extensions, Structures, strategies and beyond: Studies in honour of Adriana Belletti. Vol. 223, pp. 1-16. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Compton, R., & Pittman, C. (2010). “Word-formation by phase in Inuit”. Lingua. (Vol. 120, pp. 2167-2192): Elsevier.
Dabir-Moghaddam, M. (1997). “Compound verbs in Persian”, Studies in the Linguistic Sciences. Vol. 27. No. 2. pp. 25-59.
Di Sciullo, A. M. (2003). “Morphological phases. Generative Grammar in a Broader Perspective”. Proceedings of the 4th GLOW in Asia. 2003. (pp. 113-137). The Korean Generative Grammar Circle, Seoul National University.
Di Sciullo, A. M. (2005). “Decomposing compounds”. SKASE Journal of theoretical linguistics. Vol. 2 (3). pp 14-33.
Embick, D., & Noyer, R. 2001. “Movement operations after syntax”. Linguistic inquiry. 32 (4). pp 555-595.
Emonds, J. (2002). “A common basis for syntax and morphology: tri-level lexical insertion”. In P. Boucher (Ed.), Many Morphologies. pp. 235-262. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Fábregas, A. (2011). “On why word phases cannot account for Lexical Integrity Effects”. Lingue e linguaggio. 10 (1). 3-28.
Folli, R., Harley, H., & Karimi, S. (2005). “Determinants of event type in Persian complex predicates”. Lingua. 115 (10), 1365-1401.
Ghomeshi, J., & Massam, D. (1994). “Lexical/syntactic relations without projection”. Linguistic Analysis. 24 (3-4). 175-217.
Goldberg, A. E. (1996). “Words by default: Optimizing constraints and the Persian complex predicate”. In Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Vol. 22. pp. 132-146.
Hale, K., & Keyser, S. J. (1993). “On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations”. In K. H. a. S. J. Keyser (Ed.), The view from building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bomberger. Vol. 20. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Hale, K. L., & Keyser, K. L. H. S. J. (2002). Prolegomenon to a theory of argument structure. Vol. 39. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Halle, M., & Marantz, A. (1993). “Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection”. In K. H. a. S. J. Keyser (Ed.), The View from Building 20 (pp. 111-176). Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Harley, H., & Noyer, R. (1999). “Distributed morphology”, Glot International. Vol. 4, pp. 3-9.
Johnson, K. (2003). “Towards an etiology of adjunct islands”. The Proceedings of the 19th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics.
Julien, M. (2002). Syntactic heads and word formation: Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Karimi-Doostan, G. (1997). Light verb construction in Persian. PhD thesis. University of Essex, England.
Karimi-Doostan, G. (2011). “Separability of light verb constructions in Persian”. Studia Linguistica, 65 (1). 70-95.
Karimi, S. (1997). “Persian complex verbs: Idiomatic or compositional”. Lexicology, 3 (2). pp 273-318.
Karimi, S. (2005). A Minimalist approach to scrambling: Evidence from Persian. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Li, Y. (2005). X0: A theory of the morphology-syntax interface. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Lieber, R., & Scalise, S. (2006). “The Lexical Integrity Hypothesis in a new theoretical universe”. Lingue e linguaggio. 5 (1), 7-32.
Lopez, L. (2015). “Parallel Computation in Word Formation”. Linguistic Inquiry, Vol. 46, No. 4. 657–701.
Marantz, A. (1997). “No escape from syntax: Don't try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon”. University of Pennsylvania working papers in linguistics, 4 (2). 14.
Marantz, A. (2001). “Words”. Paper presented at the 20th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. from http://users.uoa.gr/~wlechner/Marantz%20words.pdf. Retrieved: 5 May 2018.
Marantz, A. (2007). “Phases and words”. In S.-H. Choe (Ed.), Phases in the theory of grammar (pp. 191-222). Seoul: Dong In.
Marvin, T. (2003). Topics in the Stress and Syntax of Words. PhD Thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Megerdoomian, K. (2002). Beyond words and phrases. Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation. USC.
Newell, H. (2008). Aspects of the morphology and phonology of phases. Unpublished PhD Diss., McGill University.
Pantcheva, M. (2008). “Noun preverbs in Persian complex predicates”. Tromsø Working Papers on Language and Linguistics: Nordlyd, 35, special issue on Complex Predication, ed. Peter Svenonius and Inna Tolskaya, pp. 19–45. CASTL, Tromsø. http://www.ub.uit.no/baser/nordlyd/.
Ramchand, G. C. (2008). Verb meaning and the lexicon: A first phase syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Randall, J. H. (2010). Linking: The geometry of argument structure. Boston: Springer Science & Business Media.
Rizzi, L. (2016). “Labeling, maximality and the head phrase-distinction”. The Linguistic Review. Vol. 33. pp. 103-127.
Siddiqi, D. (2009). Syntax within the Word. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Spencer, A. (1994). “Morphological theory and English”. Links & Letters (1), 71-84.
Spencer, A. (2005). “Word-formation and syntax”. In Štekauer, P. & Lieber, R. (Eds.) Handbook of word-formation. pp. 73-97. Amsterdam: Springer.
Tabaian, H. (1979). “Persian compound verbs”. Lingua, 47(2). pp 189-208.
Uriagereka, J. (2000). Rhyme and reason: An introduction to minimalist syntax. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Uriagereka, J. (2008). Syntactic anchors: On semantic structuring. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vahedi-Langrudi, M. (1996). The syntax, semantics and argument structure of complex predicates in modern Farsi. Unpublished PhD Diss., University of Ottawa (Canada).
Language Related Research
Volume 11, Issue 3 - Serial Number 57
July and August 2020
Pages 283-311