The Representation of Enemy in the Memoirs of a Woman in Captivity: A Case Study of the Book I Am Alive

Document Type : مقالات علمی پژوهشی

Authors
1 Ph.D. Candidate in Linguistics, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of Linguistics, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran.
3 Associate Professor, Department of Quranic Sciences and Tradition, Imam Sadiq University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
This research is an attempt to represent the enemy in a woman's self-portrait memoirs about Iraq’s war against Iran. Years after, those who were involved in the war have an image of an enemy which is different from the mental and cultural boundaries of those who didn’t experience war. Besides, the point of view of a woman gives a different image of the enemy. Therefore, to depict the representation of this enemy, the book "I Am Alive" by "Masoumeh Abad" was selected. This book is written directly by the person who was engaged in war and the text is not influenced by any possible chronologist or diarist helping writing the text; hence, it is considered a direct and firsthand text. By applying Lotman’s cultural semiotic theory, Echo’s theory of inventing enemy and the semiotic square of Greimas the text was analyzed. Study of the text showed that polarization, delineation and making an ideological enemy has been used to represent the enemy. The form of the enemy and the amount of hostility in this text are not fixed. The writer allocates different degrees of hostility to enemies, and we see a continuum of enemy. In some cases, as circumstances require, such as the perceived danger or helplessness, enemy is considered an insider.

1. Introduction

The Iraq-Iran’s war is the longest conventional war of the twentieth century, beginning with Iraq's invasion of Iran and lasting eight years. In the Pahlavi era, governments differed greatly over borders and water resources, and relations were very strained. With the conclusion of the, however, after the Islamic Revolution in Iran, Saddam Hussein, who was at the head of the ruling Ba'ath party, unilaterally terminated the 1975 Algiers agreement and launched a large-scale attack against Iran on September 22, 1980. It was a war between two neighboring countries in which the people of both lands shared religious affiliations. For this reason, the effects of this war on the lives of the people were profound and unforgettable, especially ideologically it was unbelievable for them to deal with an enemy of the same religion was unbelievable to them.

Decades after the war, those involved in the war still have an image of the enemy that differs from the mental and cultural boundaries of those who have not experienced war. On the other hand, the way a woman conceptualizes the enemy gives a different picture of it. So, we aim to answer these questions, how enemy is formed from a woman's point of view? What mechanisms are used to represent the enemy? And does the enemy have a fixed meaning?

2. Literature Review

War memoir is one of the most common methods of recording events, both during and after the war. For this reason, many works related to the Iraq-Iran war have been written in the form of memoirs. In this regard, Kazemi (2015), Salimi-Nejad (2014), Faizi Sho’ar (2014), Mo’men Abadi (2014), Gholam Hosseinzadeh (2013), Tadi Bani (2011), Qaisari (2011), Ilkhan (1388) and Irvani (1386) in their master’s theses have studied some memories about Iraq-Iran’s war. Sasani (2005, 2008) has also collected and translated a collection of articles related to war as a socio-cultural phenomenon from various foreign authors. Numerous studies have been done in connection with the theory of cultural semiotics, including Lotman (1990, 1984), Posner (2004), Echo (2012), Sonesson (2000, 2001, 2004) and Pakatachi (2004). )

3. Methodology

This is a descriptive-analysis case study research. In order to answer the questions of this research, data were collected from first hand documents about war. The first hand document is a written piece which is written by the same person who was involved in the events of the memoirs directly and is not affected by the thoughts and opinions of those who write else’s memoirs. Also the gender and locality variables were considered. Therefore the book I am alive by Masoumeh Abad was selected. The author, Masoumeh Abad, is a young lady from Abadan and a native of the war zone. She was a captive for four years in Iraqi camps and has written a book about the memoirs of her captivity. In this study, Lotman semiosphere model, Eco inventing enemy theory, and Greimas semiotic-square model have been used to examine the data.

4. Results

The concept of "other" has always played an fundamental role in one’s identity recognition. Whether it is a living thing or an object or a natural force. If someone feels any threat or danger from this "other", immediately recognizes him as an enemy and attributes the maximum of malice and hostility to him. In this way, the person gets the maximum distance from the "other" and is prepared to face the possible danger from the enemy. By applying semiotic tools and echo theory, we found that the author of book I am Alive uses polarization and imagery processes to describe the enemy. She creates an ideological enemy for herself and the audience, which has the highest level of malice, and by using inter textual references to the events of the beginning of Islam, especially the Ashura incident, places the enemy in the lowest possible ideological position. The image of this enemy is completely black and has a polar nature. On the other hand, we see that the enemy in this work is not only formulated on the basis of dualism and polar binaries, but is seen as a continuous conceptual entity. Some characters have less enmity and hostility than others. . Sometimes the author raises the farthest enemies to the nearest insiders as needed to avoid potential danger The feature of continuity in representing enemy was explained via presented model which was inspired by Greimas semiotic-square





Figure 3

Continuum of the concept of the enemy





















As you can see the concept of enemy can glide from the left side of axis to the right side and get close to the concept of friend. Vice versa a friend can move to the left, lose its features of being a friend and become an enemy



6. Conclusion

It can be said that the concept of enemy is a floating, unstable and graded concept. The word enemy is an empty container in which anyone or anything with different grades can be placed in different situations.


Keywords

Subjects


- آباد، معصومه (1393). من زنده‌ام، تهران: انتشارات بروج.
- ایروانی، محمدرضا (1386). بررسی و نقد و تحلیل سبکی خاطرات آزادگان دفاع مقدس، پایان‌نامه‌ی کارشناسی ارشد، تهران: دانشگاه تربیت مدرس.
- ایلخان، فرخنده (1388). تاریخ شفاهی زنان: تجربه‌ی زیستی همسران شهدا در جنگ، پایان‌نامه‌ی کارشناسی ارشد، تهران: دانشگاه الزهرا.
- پاکتچی، احمد (1383). مفاهیم متقابل فرهنگ و طبیعت در حوزه نشانه‌شناسی فرهنگی مکتب مسکو/ تارتو، مجموعه مقالات اولین هم‌اندیشی نشانه‌شناسی هنر، تهران: فرهنگستان هنر.
- ساسانی، فرهاد (1387). خاطره و گفتمان جنگ، تهران: انتشارات سوره‌ی مهر.
- ------- (1384). گفتمان جنگ، تهران: انتشارات سوره‌ی مهر.
- سلطانی، سید علی‌اصغر (1392). قدرت، گفتمان و زبان: سازوکارهای جریان‌های قدرت در جمهوری اسلامی ایران، چاپ چهارم، تهران: نشر نی.
- سلیمی نژاد، فرشاد (1393). بررسی و تحلیل بن‌مایه‌های فکری در خاطره‌نویسی دفاع مقدس با تأکید بر آثار: دا، دختر شینا، لشکر خوبان، پایی که جا ماند، پایان‌نامه‌ی کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی ‌واحد خلخال.
- شعیری، حمیدرضا (1388). مبانی معناشناسی نوین، تهران: انتشارات سمت.
- طادی بنی، فریبا (1390). بررسی محتوای خاطرات هشت سال دفاع مقدس، پایان‌نامه‌ی کارشناسی ارشد، شهرکرد، دانشگاه شهرکرد.
- غلام‌حسین‌زاده، محسن (1392). بررسی خاطره‌نویسی در ادبیات دفاع مقدس با تاکید بر سه کتاب، پرواز تا بی‌نهایت، آیینه اِسارت و نبرد درالوگ با نگاهی به سیرتکاملی آن در ادبیات کلاسیک، پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه سمنان.
- فیضی شعار، فاطمه (1393). بررسی ارزش‌های انقلاب اسلامی در خاطرات آزادگان، پایان‌نامه‌ی کارشناسی ارشد، تهران، دانشگاه شاهد.
- قیصری، عبدالرضا (1390). طنز و شوخ طبعی در خاطره نوشته‌های دفاع مقدس، پایان‌نامه‌ی کارشناسی ارشد، کرمان، دانشگاه شهید باهنر.
- کاظمی، افسانه (1394). بررسی مؤلفه‌های فرهنگ ایثار و شهادت در خاطرات آزادگان دوران دفاع مقدس، پایان‌نامه‌ی کارشناسی ارشد، تهران، دانشگاه شاهد.
- کمری، علیرضا (1390). نام آورد (2): بیست مقاله و گفتاورد درباره‌ی مطالعات نشانه‌شناختی جنگ/دفاع مقدس، دفتر دوم، تهران: انتشارات سوره‌ی مهر.
- لاکلا، ارنستو (1385). «واسازی، عمل‌گرایی، هژمونی»، در دیکانستراکشن و پراگماتیسم، ویراسته شنتل موف، ترجمه: شیوا رویگریان، تهران: گام نو.
- مومن‌آ‌بادی، مرجان (1393). بررسی ساختار روایی در خاطره نوشته‌های زنان از جنگ با تأکید بر "یکشنبه آخر" خانم معصومه رامهرمزی و"زیتون سرخ" خانم ناهید یوسفیان، پایان‌نامه‌ی کارشناسی ارشد، سمنان، دانشگاه سمنان.
- نامورمطلق، بهمن و کنگرانی، منیژه (1395). نشانه‌‌شناسی فیلم‌های مستند دفاع مقدس: مجموعه مقالات، تهران: انتشارات علمی فرهنگی.
- Courtés, J. (1991). Analyse Sémiotique du Discours. De l'énoncé à l'énonciation. Paris: Hachette
- Eco, U, (2012). Inventing Enemy and Other Occasional writings, translated by Richard Dixon. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company.
- Lotman, J. (1984). “Лотман, Юрий. О семиосфере. Труды по знаковым системам”, Sign Systems Studies, 17: 5–23.
- ________ (1990). Universe of the Mind. A Semiotic Theory of Culture. Bloomington/ Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
- Posner, R. (2004). “Basic Tasks of Cultural Semiotics”, In: Gloria Withalm and Josef Wallmannsberger (eds.), Signs of Power – Power of Signs. Essays in Honor of Jeff Bernard. Vienna: INST, p. 56-89.
- Sonesson, G (2004). “The Globalisation of Ego and Alter. An essay in Cultural Semiotics”, Semiotica 148 (1/4). p.153-17
- ---------------- (2001) “Does Ego meet Alter — in the Global Village? A View from Cultural Semiotics”, Cultural identity in transition/Identitate culturalã în transitie, Proceedings of the 1st Semotics of Culture, conference, Univesitatea din Bacâu, Romania, November 1 – 4.
- -------------- (2000) “Ego meets Alter. The Meaning of Otherness”. In: Cultural Semiotics Special issue of Semiotica 128-3/4: Essays in honour of Vilmos Voigt, Bernard, Jeff (ed.), 537-559.