The Effect of Direct Versus Indirect Focused Written Corrective Feedback on Developing EFL Learners’ Written and Oral Skills

Document Type : Research article

Authors
M. Esmaeeli 1
K. Sadeghi 2
1 Postgraduate Student, Department of English, Faculty of Humanities, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran
2 , Professor of Applied Linguistics/TESOL, PhD, Department of English, Faculty of Humanities, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran
10.29252/LRR.11.5.124
Abstract
There has been an increasing attention to written corrective feedback (WCF) and its potential effectiveness in recent years. This paper examines the roles of direct versus indirect WCF in fostering learners’ written and oral accuracy across language proficiency. A quasi-experimental design was adopted to conduct the study. Seventy-six pre-intermediate and upper-intermediate EFL learners were randomly assigned into six groups (four experimental and two control groups). In the experimental group, a series of pictures were used as prompts for writing tasks in the treatment sessions, and pre-, immediate, and delayed posttests were used to measure written and oral accuracy. According to the results, WCF, regardless of the type, was facilitative in developing learners’ both written and oral accuracy, which was a manifestation of implicit knowledge. The results also revealed that the proficiency level played a key role in determining which type of CF was more beneficial. While the pre-intermediate learners benefited more from direct CF, the upper-intermediate group improved more as a result of indirect CF treatment. This study calls for more informed decisions by L2 teachers in the correction of written errors considering that it improved L2 learners’ oral accuracy

Keywords

Subjects

Agwu, S. N. (2005). Strategies for teaching the arts and social sciences. Enugu: Pan-African Publishers.
Alderson, J. C., Bachman, L. F. (2001). Series editors’ preface. In Buck, G. (Eds) Assessing listening (pp. x–xi). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Allen, R. (2003). Expanding writing role in learning: teacher training holds key to change. Curriculum Update. Alexandria: Association for supervision and curriculum development
Ashwell, T. (2011). Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multiple draft composition. Journal of Second Language Writing, 9, 227-258.
Bowles, M., Montrul, S. (2008). The role of explicit instruction in the L2 acquisition of the a-personal. In: Bruhn de Garavito, J., Valenzuela, E. (Eds.), Selected papers from the 10th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 25–35). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Baker, S., Russell, G. & Graham, S. (2003). Teaching expressive writing to students with learning disabilities: Research-based applications and examples. Journal of Learning Diasabilities, 36(2), 109-123.
Bello, T. (1997). Writing topics for adult ESL students. Paper presented at the 31st Annual Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages Convention, Orlando.
Bitchener, J. (2008). Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 102-118.
Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2008). The value of written corrective feedback for migrant and international students. Language Teaching Research, 12, 409-431.
Bitchener, J. (2008). Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 102-118.
Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2009). The value of a focused approach to written corrective feedback. ELT Journal, 63, 204-211.
Bitchener, J., Young, S. & Cameron, D. (2005). The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(3), 191–205.
Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error correction for improvement of the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(3), 267-296.
Chandler, J. (2012). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 267-296.
Chin, B.A. (2000). The role of grammar in improving students’ writing. Retrieved from http://www.uwplatt.edu/~ciesield/ graminwriting.htm.
Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error correction for improvement of the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(3), 267-296.
Doughty, C., & Varela, E. (1998). Communicative focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 114-138). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ellis, R. (1997). Second Language Acquisition. Oxford. Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R. (2009a). Corrective feedback and teacher development. L2 Journal, 1(1), 3-18.
Ellis, R. (2009a). Implicit and explicit learning, knowledge and instruction. In R. Ellis, S. Loewen, C. Elder, R. Erlam, J. Philp, & H. Reinders (Eds.), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching (pp.3-25). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Ellis, R. (2009b). A typology of written corrective feedback types. English Language Teaching Journal, 63, 97-107.
Eliss, R. (2010). A framework for investigating oral and written corrective feedback. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 355-349
Ellis, R. (2008). A typology of written corrective feedback types. ELT Journal, 63(2), 97-107.
Ellis, R. (2005). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 141-172
Ellis, R. (2009). A typology of written corrective feedback types. ELT journal, 63, 97-107.
Ellis, R., Sheen, Y., Murakami, M., & Takashima, H. (2008). The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as foreign language context. System, 36, 353-371.
Ferris, D. (1999). The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: A response to Truscott (1996). Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(1), 1-11.
Ferris, D., & Roberts, B. (2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes. How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 161–184.
Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1996). The influence of source of planning and focus of planning on task-based performance. Language Teaching Research, 3(3), 215-247.
Gholaminejad, R., Moinzadeh, A., Youhanaee, M., & Ghobadirad, H. (2013). Writing Attitudes of Iranian EFL Students: A Qualitative Study. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(5), 1138- 1145.
Gower, R., & Philips, D., Walters, S. (1995). Teaching Practice Handbook. Oxford, UK: Macmillan Publishers Limited.
Grabe, W. & Kaplan, R. B. (1996). Theory and practice of writing. London: Longman.
Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis Issues and implications. New York: Longman.
Kroll, B. (2003). Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Han, Z. H. (2002). A study of the impact of recasts on tense consistency in L2 output. TESOL Quarterly, 36, 543-572.
Karim, K., & Nassaji, H. (2018). The revision and transfer effects of direct and indirect comprehensive corrective feedback on ESL students’ writing. Language Teaching Research, 1-21.
Lee, I. (2003). L2 writing teachers’ perspectives, practices and problems regarding error feedback. Assessing Writing 8(3), 216-237.
Long, M., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research and practice. In C. Doughty, & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 15–41). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Lalande, J. (1982). Reducing composition errors: An experiment. Modern Language Journal 66(2), 140–149
Luoma, S. (2004). Assessing speaking. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Richards, J. C. (1990). Conversationally speaking: Approaches to the teaching of conversation. In Jack C. Richards, The Language Teaching Matrix (pp. 67–85). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Muranoi, H. (2000). Focus on form through interaction enhancement: Integrating formal instruction into a communicative task in EFL classrooms. Language Learning, 50, 617-673.
Namaziandost, E., & Ahmadi, S. (2019). The assessment of oral proficiency through holistic and analytic techniques of scoring: a comparative study. Applied Linguistics Research Journal, 3(2), 70–82
Namaziandost, E., Rahimi Esfahani, F., Nasri, M., & Mirshekaran, R. (2018). The effect of gallery walk technique on pre-intermediate EFL learners’ speaking skill language teaching. Research Quarterly, 8, 1–15.
Nicholas, H., Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. (2001). Recasts as feedback to language learners. Language Learning, 51, 719-758.
Oyetunde, T. O. (2003). How do secondary school students process prints? In A. Lawal, I. Isiugo-Abarihe, & L. N. Ohia, (Eds.). Perspectives on applied linguistics in language and literature (pp. 120-140). Ibadan: Stirling-Hodden Publishers.
Reigeluth, C.M. (1990). Instruct0ional strategies and tactics. In T. Husén & T. Postlethwaite (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Education, Supplementary Volume Two (pp 56-81). Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.
Robb, T., Ross, S., & Shortreed, I. (1986). Salience of feedback on error and its effect on EFL writing quality. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 83–93.
Schmidt, R. (1994). Implicit learning and the cognitive unconscious: Of artificial grammars and SLA. In N. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 165-209). London: Academic Press.
Schmidt, R. (1994). Implicit learning and the cognitive unconscious: Of artificial grammars and SLA. Implicit and explicit learning of languages, 165-209
Sheen, Y. (2007). The effects of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners’ acquisition of articles. TESOL Quarterly, 41, 255-283.
Sheen, Y. (2010). Differential effects of oral and written corrective feedback in the ESL classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 203-234.
Skehan, P. (1996). A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 38-62.
Smith, J. (2011). Developing and sustaining critical reflection in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 40(2), 2-9.
Truscott, J. (2004). Evidence and Conjecture on the Effects of Correction: A Response to Chandler. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 337-343
Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46, 327-369
Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46, 327-369
Truscott, J. (1999). The case for “the case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes”: A response to Ferris. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 111-122.
Truscott, J. (1999). What’s wrong with oral grammar correction. Canadian Modern Language Review, 55(4), 437-456.
Truscott, J. (2001). Selecting errors for selective correction. Concentric: Studies in English Literature and Linguistics, 27, 93-108.
Truscott, J. (2007). The effect of error correction on learners’ ability to write accurately. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16, 255-272.
Velayutham, N. M. (2013). The Effectiveness of Controlled Written Metalinguistic Feedback in Improving Writing. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Weigle, S. C. (2009). What ESL teachers should know about writing assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wolfe-Quintero, K., Inagaki, S., & Kim, H. Y. (1998). Second language development in writing: Measures of fluency, accuracy, and complexity. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center
Language Related Research
Volume 11, Issue 5 - Serial Number 59
November and December 2020
Pages 124-89