تأثیر بازخورد اصلاحی نوشتاری متمرکز و غیرمتمرکز بر صحت زمان گذشتۀ سادۀ زبان‌آموزان ایرانی

نوع مقاله : مقالات علمی پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 استادیار گروه آموزش زبان انگلیسی، دانشکدۀ علوم انسانی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران
2 دانشیار گروه آموزش زبان انگلیسی، دانشکدۀ علوم انسانی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران
3 دانشجوی کارشناسی ‌ارشد گروه آموزش زبان انگلیسی، دانشکدۀ علوم انسانی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران
چکیده
مطالعۀ حاضر به بررسی نقش بازخورد اصلاحی نوشتاری متمرکز و غیرمتمرکز مستقیم بر صحت زمان گذشتۀ سادۀ باقاعده و بی­قاعدۀ انگلیسی زبان­آموزان سطح متوسط پرداخت. تعداد 60 زبان­آموز ایرانی به­طور تصادفی به دو گروه آزمایشی (متمرکز و غیرمتمرکز) و گروه گواه طبقه­بندی شدند. هر سه گروه در 4 جلسۀ متوالی، تکلیف نوشتاری انجام و به معلم تحویل دادند. جلسۀ بعد، هر گروه تکلیف­های خود را در شرایطی متفاوت دریافت کردند. در تکلیف­های نوشتاری گروه بازخورد اصلاحی متمرکز، صرفاً افعال نادرست زمان گذشتۀ ساده تصحیح شد، ولی در نوشتار گروه بازخورد اصلاحی غیرمتمرکز، تمامی نکته­های نادرست گرامری تصحیح شد. گروه کنترل هیچ بازخورد اصلاحی دریافت نکرد. نتایج نشان داد که گروه بازخورد اصلاحی متمرکز به­طور معنا­دار بهتر از گروه­های دیگر در پس­آزمون بلافصل عمل کرده ­است. نتایج نظرسنجی حاکی از آن است که زبان­آموزان بازخورد اصلاحی متمرکز را به بازخورد اصلاحی غیرمتمرکز ترجیح دادند.


کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


سعیداختر، افسانه و همکاران (1397). تاثیر بازخورد اصلاحی فرازبانی و بازنویسی بر یادگیری افعال باقاعده و بیقاعده زمان گذشته ساده انگلیسی. جستارهای زبانی، دوره 9، شماره 6 (پیاپی 48)، صص. 123-155
معرفت، حمیده و پاشازاده، حسن (1395). واکنش سه ساختار نحوی زبان انگلیسی به انواع بازخورد نوشتاری. جستارهای زبانی، دوره 7، شماره 5 (پیاپی 33)، صص. 149-170
References
Bitchener, J. (2008). Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 102‒118.
Bitchener, J. (2012). A reflection on the language learning potential of written CF. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(2), 348‒363.
Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2008). The value of written corrective feedback for migrant and international students. Language Teaching Research Journal, 12(3), 409‒431.
Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2009). The value of a focused approach to written corrective feedback. ELT Journal, 63(3), 204‒211.
Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2010a). The contribution of written corrective feedback to language development: A ten month investigation. Applied Linguistics, 31(2), 193‒214.
Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2010b). Raising the linguistic accuracy level of advanced L2 writers with written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19(4), 207‒217.
Bitchener, J., Yung, S., & Cameron, D. (2005). The effect of direct types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(3), 191‒205.
Bruton, A. (2010). Another reply to Truscott on error correction: Improved situated designs over statistics. System, 38,491–498.
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R., Sheen, Y., Murakami, M., & Takashima, H. (2008). The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in English as a foreign language context. System, 36, 353–371.
Farrokhi, F., & Sattarpour, S. (2011). The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback on grammatical accuracy of Iranian EFL learners. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1, 1797–1803.
Ferris, D. R. (2003). Responding to writing. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Exploring the dynamics of second language writing (pp.119–140). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ferris, D. R., & Robert, B. (2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 161–184.
Ferris, D. R. (2002). Treatment of error in second language student writing. Michigan: The University of Michigan Press.
Ferris, D. R. (2003). Response to student writing: Implications for second language students. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Ferris, D. R. (2010). Second language writing research and written corrective feedback in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 181‒201.
Frear, D. (2010). The effect of focused and unfocused direct written corrective feedback on a new piece of writing. College English: Issues and Trends, 3, 59–71.
Frear, D. (2011). The effect of focused and unfocused direct written corrective feedback on a new piece of writing. College English, 3, 357‒372.
Frear, D. (2012). The effect of written corrective feedback and revision on intermediate Chinese learners’ acquisition of English (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Guo, Q. (2015). The effectiveness of written CF for L2 development: A mixed method study of written CF types, error categories and proficiency levels (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). AUT University, Auckland, New Zealand.
Hyland, K. (1990). Providing productive feedback. ELT Journal, 44, 279–285.
Iwashita, N. (2003). Negative feedback and positive evidence in task-based interaction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 1‒36.
Karimi, M., & Fotovatnia, Z. (2012). The effects of focused vs. unfocused written teacher correction on the grammatical accuracy of Iranian EFL undergraduates. The Asian EFL Journal, 62, 117–141.
Lee, I. (2004). Error correction in L3 secondary writing classrooms: The case of Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 285‒312.
Lee, I. (2005). Error correction in the L2 classroom: What do students think? TESL Canada Journal, 22, 1‒16.
Marefat, H., & Pashazade, H. (2016). The reaction of three English grammatical structures to different types of written feedback. Language Related Research, 7(5), 1491‒70 [In Persian].
Mawlawi Diab, N. (2015). Effectiveness of written corrective feedback: Does type of error and type of correction matter? Assessing Writing, 24, 16‒34.
Oladejo, J. A. (1993). Error correction in ESL: Learners’ preferences. TESL Canada Journal, 10, 71‒89.
Palizvan, R. (2018). The effect of teacher’s electronic feedback on Iranian intermediate learners’ accuracy of simple present passive voice (Unpublished master’s thesis). The University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Iran.
Quintero, L. M. (2008). Blogging: A way to foster EFL writing. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 10(1), 7‒49.
Richards, J. C., & Lockhart, C. (1994). Reflective teaching in second language classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rico, L. J. A. (2014). Identifying factors causing difficulties to productive skills among foreign language learners. Opening Writing Door Journal, 11(1), 65‒86.
Robinson, P. (2003). Attention and memory during SLA. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 631‒678). Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
Roshan, S. (2017). Written corrective feedback, individual differences and second language acquisition of the English passive voice (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Auckland University of Technology, New Zealand.
Rouhi, A., & Samiei, M. (2010). The effects of focused and unfocused indirect written corrective feedback on grammatical accuracy of Iranian EFL learner. Social Science, 5, 481‒485.
Rummel, S. (2014). Student and teacher beliefs about written CF and the effect those beliefs have on uptake: A multiple case study of Laos and Kuwait (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). AUT University, Auckland, New Zealand.
Saeedakhtar, A., Abdi, R., & Moradpour, Z. (2019). The effect of metalinguistic corrective feedback and revision on the accuracy of English regular and irregular simple past tense. Language Related Research, 9(6), 123‒155 [In Persian].
Schmidt, R. (1993). Awareness and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 206–226.
Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3‒32). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sheen, Y. (2007). The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners’ acquisition of articles. TESOL Quarterly, 41, 255–283.
Sheen, Y., Wright, D., & Moldawa, A. (2009). Differential effects of focused and unfocused written correction on the accurate use of grammatical forms by adult ESL learners. System, 37(4), 556‒569.
Shintani, N., Aubrey, S., & Donnellan, M. (2016). The effects of pre-task and post-task metalinguistic explanations on accuracy in second language writing. TESOL Quarterly, 50(4), 945‒955.
Shintani, N., & Ellis, R. (2013). The comparative effect of metalinguistic explanation and direct written corrective feedback on learners’ explicit and implicit knowledge of the English indefinite article. Journal of Second Language Writing, 23(3), 286‒306.
Shintani, N., Ellis, R., & Suzuki, W. (2014). Effects of written feedback and revision on learners’ accuracy in using two English grammatical structures. Language Learning, 64(1), 103‒131.
Stefanou, C., & Revesz, A. (2015). Direct written corrective feedback, learner differences, and the acquisition of second language article use for generic and specific plural references. The Modern Language Journal, 99(2), 263‒282.
Storch, N., & Wigglesworth, G. (2010). Learners’ processing, uptake, and retention of corrective feedback on writing: Case studies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 10, 29–46.
Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (EDs), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honor of H. G. Widdowson (pp. 125‒144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Truscott, J., & Hsu, A.Y. (2008). Error correction, revision, and learning. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 292–305.
Ur, P. (1996). A course in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Van Beuningen, C. (2010). Corrective feedback in L2 writing: Theoretical perspective, empirical insights, and future directions. International Journal of English Studies, 10, 1–27.
Van Beuningen, C., De Jong, N. H., & Kuiken, F. (2008). The effect of direct and indirect corrective feedback on L2 learners’ written accuracy. ITL-Review of Applied Linguistics, 156, 279‒296.
Van Beuningen, C., De Jong, N. H., & Kuiken, F. (2012). Evidence on the effectiveness of comprehensive error correction in second language writing. Language Learning, 62(1), 1‒44.
Van Patten, B. (2004). Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary. New York: Routledge.
Yang, Y., & Lyster, R. (2010). Effects of form-practice and feedback on Chinese EFL learners’ acquisition of regular and irregular past tense forms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 235‒263.
Zacharias, N. (2007). Teacher and student attitudes toward teacher feedback. SAGE Publications, 38, 38–52.
Zhuo, C. (2010). Explicit recast, implicit recast and the acquisition of English noun plural: A comparative study. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 33, 55‒70.