The Effect of Collaborative Writing Using Google Docs on EFL Learners’ Writing Performance and Writing Self-regulation

Document Type : مقالات علمی پژوهشی

Authors
1 Assistant Professor in TEFL, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran
2 Assistant Professor in TEFL, Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran
3 MA in TEFL, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran
Abstract
The use of Web 2.0 technology in language education has received much research attention quite recently. In an attempt to shed more light on the use of Google Docs as a kind of Web 2.0 technology in language learning, the purpose of the present study was to compare the effects of online collaborative writing using Google Docs and collaborative writing in a face-to-face classroom on the writing performance and writing self-regulation of EFL learners. A sample of 38 homogeneous intermediate learners was recruited as the participants who were then randomly divided to an experimental group (N= 19) and a control group (N= 19). The participants of the experimental group received online collaborative writing using Google Docs while the control group received collaborative writing in the face-to-face classroom. Two timed-writing tasks and the Second Language Writing Self-regulation (SLWS) scale were administered to gather the data. The results obtained from performing paired-samples t-tests and ANCOVA revealed that collaborative writing both via using Google Docs and in the face-to-face classroom significantly enhanced the writing performance and writing self-regulation of the participants. However, the gains experienced by the experimental group were significantly higher than those experienced by the control group. Pedagogical implications for Google Docs supported collaborative writing are finally discussed.

Keywords

Subjects


Abrams, Z. (2016). Exploring collaboratively written L2 texts among first-year learners of German in Google Docs. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(8), 1259-1270.
Aghaee, N., & Keller, C. (2016). ICT-supported peer interaction among learners in Bachelor's and Master's thesis courses. Computers & Education, 94, 276-297.
Alharbi, M. A. (2019). Exploring the potential of Google Doc in facilitating innovative teaching and learning practices in an EFL writing course. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1-16.
Aljaafreh, A., & Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. The Modern Language Journal, 78(4), 465-483.
Ary, D., L. C. Jacobs, C. Sorensen, & D. Walker. (2019). Introduction to Research in Education. (10th ed.). Cengage.
Baylor, A. L., & Ritchie, D. (2002). What factors facilitate teacher skill, teacher morale, and perceived student learning in technology-using classrooms?. Computers & Education, 39(4), 395-414.
Bikowski, D., & Vithanage, R. (2016). Effects of web-based collaborative writing on individual L2 writing development. Language Learning & Technology, 20(1), 79-99.
Blau, I., & Caspi, A. (2009). What type of collaboration helps? Psychological ownership, perceived learning and outcome quality of collaboration using Google Docs. In Proceedings of the Chais conference on instructional technologies research (Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 48-55).
Boykin, A., Evmenova, A. S., Regan, K., & Mastropieri, M. (2019). The impact of a computer-based graphic organizer with embedded self-regulated learning strategies on the argumentative writing of students in inclusive cross-curricula settings. Computers & Education, 137, 78-90.
Brown, J. D., & Bailey, K. M. (1984). A categorical instrument for scoring second language writing skills. Language Learning, 34(4), 21-38.
Buss, K., & Karnowski, L. (2000). Reading and writing literary genres. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Chen, T. (2016). Technology-supported peer feedback in ESL/EFL writing classes: A research synthesis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(2), 365-397.
Chu, S. K. W., & Kennedy, D. M. (2011). Using online collaborative tools for groups to co‐construct knowledge. Online Information Review, 35(4), 581-597.
Coyle, J. E. Jr. (2007). Wikis in the college classroom: A comparative study of online and face-to-face group collaboration at a private liberal arts university. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kent State University College and Graduate School of Education, Health and Human Services.
Csizér, K., & Tankó, G. (2017). English majors’ self-regulatory control strategy use in academic writing and its relation to L2 motivation. Applied Linguistics, 38(3), 386-404.
Dao, P. (2020). Effect of interaction strategy instruction on learner engagement in peer interaction. System, 91, 1-13.
Dizon, G. (2016). A comparative study of Facebook vs. paper-and-pencil writing to improve L2 writing skills. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(8), 1249-1258.
Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J. P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 33-56). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Dörnyei, Z. (2014). Researching complex dynamic systems:‘Retrodictive qualitative modelling’in the language classroom. Language Teaching, 47(1), 80-91.
Ebadi, S., & Rahimi, M. (2017). Exploring the impact of online peer-editing using Google Docs on EFL learners’ academic writing skills: A mixed methods study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(8), 787-815.
Fathi, J., Ahmadnejad, M., & Yousofi, N. (2019). Effects of blog-mediated writing instruction on L2 writing motivation, self-efficacy, and self-regulation: A mixed methods study. Research in Applied Linguistics, 10(2), 159-181.
Fathi, J., & Ebadi, S. (2020). Exploring EFL pre-service teachers’ adoption of technology in a CALL program: obstacles, motivators, and maintenance. Education and Information Technologies, 1-21.
Fathi, J., & Nourzadeh, S. (2019). Examining the effects of writing instruction through blogging on second language writing performance and anxiety. Issues in Language Teaching, 8(1), 63-91.
Fathi, J., & Rahimi, M. (2020). Examining the impact of flipped classroom on writing complexity, accuracy, and fluency: a case of EFL students. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-39.
Fernández‐Dobao, A. (2020). Collaborative writing in mixed classes: What do heritage and second language learners think?. Foreign Language Annals, 53(1), 48-68.
Ferris, D. R., & Hedgcock, J. S. (2014). Teaching L2 composition: Purpose, process, and practice (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Fung, Y. M. (2010). Collaborative writing features. RELC Journal, 41(1), 18-30.
Godwin-Jones, R. (2018). Second language writing online: An update. Language Learning & Technology, 22(1), 1-15.
Han, J., & Hiver, P. (2018). Genre-based L2 writing instruction and writing-specific psychological factors: The dynamics of change. Journal of Second Language Writing, 40, 44-59.
Hirvela, A. (1999). Collaborative writing instruction and communities of readers and writers. TESOL Journal, 8(2), 7-12.
Hiver, P., & Al‐Hoorie, A. H. (2016). A dynamic ensemble for second language research: Putting complexity theory into practice. The Modern Language Journal, 100(4), 741-756.
Hyland, K. (2019). Second language writing. Cambridge university press.
Jacobs, H. L., Zinkgraf, S. A., Wormuth, D. R., Hartfiel, V. F., & Hughey, J. B. (1981). Testing ESL composition: A practical approach. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Kellogg, R. T. (1996). A model of working memory in writing. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences and applications (pp. 57-71). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Kieser, A. L., & Golden, F. O. (2009). Using online office applications. Distance Learning, 6(1), 41-46.
Koch, M. (2010). Utilizing emergent web-based software tools as an effective method for increasing collaboration and knowledge sharing in collocated student design teams (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Oregon.
Kormos, J. (2012). The role of individual differences in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(4), 390-403.
Lam, R. (2015). Feedback about self-regulation: Does it remain an" Unfinished Business" in portfolio assessment of writing?. TESOL Quarterly, 49(2), 402-413.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2016). Classroom-oriented research from a complex systems perspective. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 6(3), 377-393.
Lundstrom, K., & Baker, W. (2009). To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer’s own writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18, 30-43.
Marandi, S. S., & Seyyedrezaie, M. S. (2017). The Multi-Course Comparison of the Effectiveness of Two EFL Writing Environments: Google Drive versus Face-to-Face on Iranian EFL Learners’ Writing Performance and Writing Apprehension. CALL-EJ, 18(1), 9-21.
Moyer, A. (2014). Exceptional outcomes in L2 phonology: The critical factors of learner engagement and self-regulation. Applied Linguistics, 35(4), 418-440.
Naghdipour, B. (2016). English writing instruction in Iran: Implications for second language writing curriculum and pedagogy. Journal of Second Language Writing, 32, 81-87.
Nagin, C. (2012). Because writing matters: Improving student writing in our schools. John Wiley & Sons.
Parsazadeh, N., Ali, R., & Rezaei, M. (2018). A framework for cooperative and interactive mobile learning to improve online information evaluation skills. Computers & Education, 120, 75-89.
Piniel, K., & Csizér, K. (2015). Changes in motivation, anxiety and self-efficacy during the course of an academic writing seminar. Motivational Dynamics in Language Learning, 164-194.
Platt, E., & Brooks, F. B. (2009). Embodiment as self-regulation in L2 task performance. In Gesture (pp. 78-99). Routledge.
Resta, P., & Laferrière, T. (2007). Technology in support of collaborative learning. Educational Psychology Review, 19(1), 65-83.
Semeraro, J., & Moore, N. S. (2016). The use of Google docs technology to support peer revision. Writing Instruction to Support Literacy Success, 203-220.
Seyyedrezaie, Z. S., Ghonsooly, B., Shahriari, H., & Fatemi, H. H. (2016). Mixed methods analysis of the effect of Google Docs environment on EFL Learners’ writing performance and causal attributions for success and failure. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education (TOJDE), 17, 90-110.
Slavkov, N. (2015). Sociocultural theory, the L2 writing process, and Google Drive: Strange Bedfellows?. TESL Canada Journal, 32(2), 80-94.
Soller, A., Goodman, B., Linton, F., & Gaimari, R. (1998, August). Promoting effective peer interaction in an intelligent collaborative learning system. In International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 186-195). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Sotillo, S. M. (2002). Constructivist and collaborative learning in a wireless environment. TESOL Journal, 11(3), 16-20.
Storch, N. (2005). Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students’ reflections. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(3), 153-173.
Storch, N. (2013). Collaborative writing in L2 classrooms. Multilingual Matters.
Strobl, C. (2013). Affordances of Web 2.0 technologies for collaborative advanced writing in a foreign language. Calico Journal, 31(1), 1-18.
Suwantarathip, O., & Wichadee, S. (2014). The effects of collaborative writing activity using Google Docs on students' writing abilities. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 13(2), 148-156.
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. The Modern Language Journal, 82, 320-337.
Tanis, C. J. (2020). The seven principles of online learning: Feedback from faculty and alumni on its importance for teaching and learning. Research in Learning Technology, 28.
Teng, L. S., & Zhang, L. J. (2016). Fostering strategic learning: The development and validation of the Writing Strategies for Motivational Regulation Questionnaire (WSMRQ). The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25(1), 123-134.
Thorbjørnsen, H., Supphellen, M., Nysveen, H., & Egil, P. (2002). Building brand relationships online: A comparison of two interactive applications. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 16(3), 17-34.
Villamil, O. S., & de Guerrero, M. C. (2006). Sociocultural theory: A framework for understanding the social-cognitive dimensions of peer feedback. Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues, 23-41.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge University Press.
Weigle, S. C. (2002). Assessing writing. Cambridge University Press.
Woo, M. M., Chu, S. K. W., & Li, X. (2013). Peer-feedback and revision process in a wiki mediated collaborative writing. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(2), 279-309.
Yang, C. C. R. (2010). Using Google Docs to facilitate collaborative writing in an English language classroom practice. TESL-EJ, 14(3), 1-6.
Yu, S., & Lee, I. (2016). Peer feedback in second language writing (2005-2014). Language Teaching, 49(4), 461-493.
Zabihi, R. (2018). The role of cognitive and affective factors in measures of L2 writing. Written Communication, 35(1), 32-57.
Zemach, D. E. & Rumisek, L. A. (2003). Academic writing from paragraph to essay. Macmillan.
Zorko, V. (2009). Factors affecting the way students collaborate in a wiki for English language learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(5), 645-665.