Interpersonal Meaning Analysis of Donald Trump’s Remarks on COVID-19 Outbreak

Document Type : Research article

Authors
S. Setiawan 1
I. Wulandari 2
A. Fanani 3
Y. Arifani 4
1 Professor, English Department, Faculty of Languages and Arts, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia
2 Teacher, SMK Negeri 3 Surabaya, Indonesia; and Master student, English Education and Literature, Post Gradute School, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia
3 Senior Lecturer, English Education, Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Pesantren Tinggi Darul Ulum, Jombang, Indonesia
4 Associate Professor, English Language Education, Univeristas Muhammadiyah Gresik, Indonesia
10.52547/LRR.12.5.14
Abstract
This study is conducted to reveal the types of mood, speech function realizations, and the persuasion strategies applied to Donald Trump’s clauses in his three remarks regarding the issue of COVID-19. Discourse analysis is applied to analyze the data. The applied mood types and speech function realizations are then correlated with Cialdini's principles of persuasion to see the persuasion principles applied in the three remarks. The results show that the President's three remarks are dominated by declarative mood with three most frequently used speech functions: statements of fact, statements of opinion, and statements of the assertion. In terms of Cialdini's persuasion principles, the speaker uses all of the six principles in his three remarks, except the principle of preference employed only in the third remark. The other five principles, namely authority, consistency, social-evidence, reciprocity, and rareness/scarcity, are contained in the three remarks with their persuasive purposes. In Cialdini's persuasion principles, the clauses used by President Trump reveals the strategies of taking advantage of his powerful authority in his remarks, showing his consistency while delivering the remarks, expressing his best efforts for his inhabitants, and showing successful evidence in overcoming the pandemic compared with other countries’ endeavors.

Keywords

Subjects

Alemi, M., Latifi, A. & Nematzadeh, A. (2018). Persuasion in political discourse: Barak Obama’s presidential speeches against ISIS. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 22(2), 278-291.
DOI: 10.22363/2312-9182-2018-22-2-278-291
Amarinthnukrowh, P. (2019). "So, Obama is a Muslim?": Toward figurative spaces and blends in U.S. same-sex marriage discourse. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 25(4), 1-15.
DOI: 10.17576/3L-2019-2504-01
Arisetiyani, Y. & Yuliasry, I. (2017). Observance of Cialdini's principles of the speech act of persuasion in 2016 U.S. presidential debates. English Education Journal, 7(3), 237-246.
Benson, P.L., Karabenick, S.A. & Lerner, R.M. (1976). Pretty pleases: The effects of physical attractiveness, race, and sex on receiving help. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12(5), 409-415.
DOI: 10.1016/0022-1031(76)90073-1
Bickman, L. (1974). The social power of a uniform. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 4(1), 47-61.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1974.tb02599.x
Bushman, B.J. (1984). Perceived symbols of authority and their influence on compliance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 14(6), 501-508.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1984.tb02255.x
Byrne, D. (1997). An overview (and under review) of research and theory within the attraction paradigm. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 14(3), 417-431.
DOI: 10.1177/0265407597143008
Cialdini, R.B. (2001). Harnessing the science of persuasion. Harvard Business Review.
Cialdini, R.B. (2009). Influence: The psychology of persuasion. Harper Collins Publishers.
Eagly, A.H. & Chaiken, S. (1975). An attribution analysis of the effect of communicator characteristics on opinion change: The case of communicator attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(1), 136-144.
DOI: 10.1037/h0076850
Eggins, S. (2004). An introduction to systemic functional linguistics. Continuum.
Fanani, A., Setiawan, S., Purwati, O., Maisarah, M., & Qoyyimah, U. (2020a). Donald Trump ’s grammar of persuasion in his speech. Heliyon, 6, 1-7.
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e03082
Fanani, A., Setiawan, S., Purwati, O. & Maisarah, M. (2020b). Grammar of persuasion of hatred in the article ‘The kafir's blood is halal for you, so shed it’ published in the Rumiyah Magazine. Heliyon, 6(7), 1-7.
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04448
Feng, H. & Liu, Y. (2010). Analysis of interpersonal meaning in public speeches - A case study of Obama’s speech. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1(6), 825-829.
DOI:10.4304/jltr.1.6.825-829
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 117-140.
DOI: 10.1177/001872675400700202
Gass, R.H. & Seiter, J.S. (2016). Persuasion: Social influence and compliance gaining. Routledge.
Groves, R.M., Cialdini, R.B. & Couper, M.P. (1992). Understanding the decision to participate in a survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 56, 475-495.
Halliday, M.A.K. (2014). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar. Routledge.
Ismail, H., Baharun, H., Abdullah, H., & Abd Majid, S. N. (2020). Power and voices of authority in the media narrative of Malaysian natives: Combining corpus linguistics and discourse analysis approaches. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 26(2), 50-66.
DOI: 10.17576/3L-2020-2602-04 50
Kim, E.J. (2016). Persuasive strategies in a chauvinistic religious discourse: The case of women's ordination. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines, 8(1), 58-83.
Mazis, M.B. (1975). Antipollution measures and psychological reactance theory: A field experiment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31(4), 654-660.
DOI: 10.1037/h0077075
Mohan, B. (2014). A study of the use of persuasive strategies in religious oratory. International Journal of Research, 1(2), 28-36.
Olimat, N., S. (2020). Words as powerful weapons: Dysphemism in Trump’s Covid-19 speeches. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies. 26(3), 17-29.
DOI: 10.17576/3L-2020-2603-02 17
Povolná, R. (2018). On some persuasive strategies in technical discourse: Cross-cultural analysis of directives in English and Czech technical manuals. Topics in Linguistics, 19(2), 72-85.
DOI: 10.2478/topling-2018-0011
Power, M.R. (1998). Chapter 2: Persuasion, structure, and language devices. Working Through Communication, 22-30.
Simons, H.W., Morreale, J. & Gronbeck, B. (2001). Persuasion in society. Sage Publications.
Milkovich, M. & Sitarica, А. (2017). Epistemic modality in political discourse. Research Result. Social Studies and Humanities, 3(1), 75-79.
DOI: 10.18413/2408-932X-2017-3-1-75-79
Stotland, E. & Patchen, M. (1961). Identification and changes in prejudice and in authoritarianism. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62(2), 266-274. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2747694
Su, L. et al. (2020). The different clinical characteristics of Coronavirus disease cases between children and their families in China - the character of children with COVID-19. Emerging Microbes & Infections, 9(1), 707-713.
DOI: 10.1080/ 22221751.2020.1744483
Werner, C.M. et al. (1995). Commitment, behavior, and attitude change: An analysis of voluntary recycling. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(3), 197-208.
DOI: 10.1016/0272-4944(95)90003-9
Language Related Research
Volume 12, Issue 5 - Serial Number 65
November and December 2021
Pages 361-384