Students' perceptions of teachers' written feedback on EFL writing in a Vietnamese tertiary context

Document Type : Research article

Authors
N. L. T. Nguyen 1
B. T. T. Nguyen 2
G. T. L. Hoang 1
1 Faculty of English, University of Foreign Languages, Hue University, 57 Nguyen Khoa Chiem, Hue, Vietnam
2 Faculty of English, University of Foreign Languages, Hue University
10.52547/LRR.12.5.16
Abstract
Teacher written feedback (TWF) has received growing attention from researchers and teachers. Although TWF arguably targets multiple dimensions of students’ writing, research to date has largely focused on the relationship between written corrective feedback and language development. More research is needed to understand TWF more holistically and as a two-way social process (Storch, 2018). As such, it is important to understand students’ perspectives on TWF in different instructional contexts. The present study explores Vietnamese EFL students’ perceptions of TWF practices and their preferences for TWF. Data was collected from 97 English-major students in a Vietnamese tertiary setting by means of a questionnaire and follow-up interviews. The findings show that while TWF tended to weigh more on the linguistic end of the form-meaning continuum, students preferred TWF to target both form and global issues of content/idea development and writing style. However, students were divided in their preferences for comprehensive/selective feedback and for direct/indirect feedback. Although students were aware of the necessity of revising their writing upon reception of feedback, they reported different post-feedback actions. Above all, students’ preferences and expectations were underpinned by their own beliefs about the values of TWF that encompass both cognitive/non-cognitive and affective dimensions. The study offers important pedagogical implications for planning written feedback in writing instruction.

Keywords

Subjects

Abalkheel, A., & Brandenburg, T. (2020). Effects of written corrective feedback: A
synthesis of 10 quasi-experimental studies. English Language Teaching, 13(7),
97–103. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v13n7p97
Amrhein, H. R., & Nassaji, H. (2010). Written corrective feedback: What do students and teachers think is right and why? Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(2), 95–127. https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/CJAL/article/view/19886
Benson, S., & DeKeyser, R. (2019). Effects of written corrective feedback and
language aptitude on verb tense accuracy. Language Teaching Research, 23(6),
702–726. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168818770921
Black, D. A., & Nanni, A. (2016). Written corrective feedback: Preferences and justifications of teachers and students in a Thai context. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, 16(3), 99–109. http://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2016-1603-07
Carless, D. (2008). Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572132
Casanave, C. P. (2010). Distancing: From real life experiences to final research report in qualitative inquiry with multilingual participants. In the 2010 Symposium on Second Language Writing, University of Murcia, Spain.
Chen, S., Nassaji, H., & Liu, Q. (2016). EFL learners’ perceptions and preferences of written corrective feedback: A case study of university students from Mainland China. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 1(5), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-016-0010-y

Chong, S. W. (2020). Written corrective feedback practices of an experienced ESL primary teacher: An ecological perspective. TESOL Journal, 11(3), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.509
Diab, R. L. (2005). EFL university students’ preferences for error correction and teacher feedback on writing. TESL Reporter, 38(1), 27–51. http://hdl.handle.net/10725/2796
Ekanayaka, W.I., & Ellis, R. (2020). Does asking learners to revise add to the effect of written corrective feedback on L2 acquisition? System, 94, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102341
Ellis, R. (2009). A typology of written corrective feedback types. ELT Journal, 63(2), 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccn023
Ellis, R., Sheen, Y., Murakami, M., & Takashima, H. (2008). The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context. System, 36(3), 353–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.02.001
Elwood, J. A., & Bode, J. (2014). Student preferences vis-à-vis teacher feedback in university EFL writing classes in Japan. System, 42, 333–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.12.023
Ene, E., & Kosobucki, V. (2016). Rubrics and corrective feedback in ESL writing: A longitudinal case study of an L2 writer. Assessing writing, 30, 3–20.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2016.06.003
Eslami, E. (2014). The effects of direct and indirect corrective feedback techniques on EFL students’ writing. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 445–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.438
Esmaeeli M., & Sadeghi, K. (2020). The effect of direct versus indirect focused written corrective feedback on developing EFL learners’ written and oral skills. Language Related Research, 11(5), 89–124. https://doi.org/10.29252/LRR.11.5.124
Farrokhi, F., Sattarpour, S. (2012). The effects of direct written corrective feedback on improvements of grammatical accuracy of high-proficient L2 learners. World Journal of Education, 2(2), 49–57. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v2n2p49
Ferris, D. R. (2011). Treatment of error in second language student writing. University of Michigan Press.
Ferris, D. R. (2014). Responding to student writing: Teachers’ philosophies and practices.
Frear, D., & Chiu, Y. H. (2015). The effect of focused and unfocused indirect written corrective feedback on EFL learners’ accuracy in new pieces of writing. System, 53,
24–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.06.006
Frear, M. W., & Bitchener, J. (2015). The effects of cognitive task complexity on writing complexity.Journal of Second Language Writing, 30(4), 45-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.08.009
Harran, M. (2011). What higher education students do with teacher feedback: Feedback-practice implications. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 29(4), 419-434. http://doi.org/10.2989/16073614.2011.651941
Hyland, F., & Hyland, K. (2001). Sugaring the pill: Praise and criticism in written feedback. Second Language Writing, 10, 185–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00038-8
Hyland, F., & Hyland, K. (2006). Feedback on second language students’ writing. Language Teaching, 39(2), 83–101. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444806003399
Jodaie, M., Farrokhi, F., & Zoghi, M. (2011). A comparative study of EFL teachers' and intermediate high school students' perceptions of written corrective feedback on grammatical errors. English Language Teaching, 4(4), 36–48. https://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/13353
Kang, E. Y., & Han, Z. (2015). The efficacy of written corrective feedback in
improving L2 written accuracy: A meta-analysis. The Modern Language Journal,
99(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12189
Kassim, A., & Ng, L. L. (2014). Investigating the efficacy of focused and unfocused corrective feedback on the accurate use of prepositions in written work. English Language Teaching, 7(2), 119–130. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v7n2p119
Kim, H. R., & Bowles, M. (2020). How deeply do second language learners process written corrective feedback? Insights gained from think-alouds. TESOL Quarterly, 53(4), 913–938. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.522
Kim, Y., Choi, B., Kang, S., Kim, B., & Yun, H. (2020). Comparing the effects of direct and indirect synchronous written corrective feedback: Learning outcomes and students' perceptions. Foreign Language Annals, 53(1), 176–199. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12443
Lee, I. (2004). Error correction in L2 secondary writing classrooms: The case of Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(4), 285–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.08.001
Lee, I. (2008). Understanding teachers’ written feedback practices in Hong Kong secondary classrooms. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(2), 69–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.10.001
Lee, I. (2014). Revisiting teacher feedback in EFL writing from sociocultural perspectives. TESOL Quarterly, 48(1), 201–213. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.153
Lee, I. (2020). Utility of focused/comprehensive written corrective feedback research for authentic L2 writing classrooms. Journal of Second Language Writing, 49, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100734
Leki, I. (1991). The preferences of ESL students for error correction in college‐level
writing classes. Foreign Language Annals, 24(3), 203–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1991.tb00464.x
Lim, S. C., & Renandya, W. A. (2020). Efficacy of written corrective feedback in
writing instruction: A meta-analysis. The Electronic Journal for English as a
Second Language, 24(3), 1–26. https://www.tesl-ej.org/wordpress/issues/volume24/ej95/ej95a3/
Mahfoodh, O. H. A. (2017). “I feel disappointed”: EFL university students’ emotional
responses towards teacher written feedback. Assessing Writing, 31, 53–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2016.07.001
Mahfoodh, O. H. A., & Pandian, A. (2011). A qualitative case study of EFL students' affective reactions to and perceptions of their teachers' written feedback. English Language Teaching, 4(3), 14–25. https://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/11871
Mao, S. S., & Crosthwaite, P. (2019). Investigating written corrective feedback:
(Mis)alignment of teachers’ beliefs and practice. Journal of Second Language
Writing, 45, 46–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.05.004
Montgomery, J. L., & Baker, W. (2007). Teacher-written feedback; Student perceptions, teacher self-assessment, and actual teacher performance. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(2), 82–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.04.002
Nguyen, H. D., & Ramnath, R. (2016). Students’ reactions to teacher written feedback in their compositions at An Giang university, Vietnam. The New English Teacher, 10(1), 42–54. http://www.assumptionjournal.au.edu/index.php/newEnglishTeacher/article/view/1344/1505
Rahimi, M. (2019). A comparative study of the impact of focused vs. comprehensive corrective feedback and revision on ESL learners’ writing accuracy and quality. Language Teaching Research, 25(5), 687–710. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168819879182
Saeli, H. (2019). Teachers’ practices and students’ preferences: Grammar-centered written corrective feedback in Iran. Research in English Language Pedagogy, 7(1), 46–70. http://relp.khuisf.ac.ir/article_663422.html
Sakrak-Ekin, G., & Balçikanli, C. (2019). Written corrective feedback: EFL teachers'
beliefs and practices. Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 19(1),
114–128. https://readingmatrix.com/files/20-47d49p9h.pdf
Shintani, N., Ellis, R., & Suzuki, W. (2014). Effects of written feedback and revision on learners’ accuracy in using two English grammatical structures. Language Learning, 64(1), 103–131. https://doi:10.1111/lang.12029
Silverman, D. (2010). Doing qualitative research (3rd ed.). SAGE.
Storch, N. (2018). Written corrective feedback from sociocultural theoretical perspectives: A research agenda. Language Teaching, 51(2), 262–277. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444818000034
Swain, M. (2013). The inseparability of cognition and emotion in second language learning. Language Teaching, 46, 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444811000486
Trabelsi, S. (2019). The perceptions and preferences of general foundation program students regarding written corrective feedback in an Omani EFL context. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 10(1), 91–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.10n.1p.91
Wiboolyasarin, W. (2021). Written corrective feedback beliefs and practices in Thai as a foreign language context: A perspective from experienced teachers. Language-related Research, 12 (3), 81–119. https://doi.org/10.29252/LRR.12.3.4
Yin, R. K (2011) Qualitative research from start to finish. The Guilford Press.
Language Related Research
Volume 12, Issue 5 - Serial Number 65
November and December 2021
Pages 405-431