Exploring Cognitive Activation Writing Strategies among Iranian English Language Teachers

Document Type : Research article

Authors
1 Associate Professor in TEFL, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Foreign Languages, Vali-e-Asr University of Rafsanjan, Rafsanjan, Iran & Languages & Linguistics Center, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
3 MA in TEFL, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
In order to engage students in higher-level thinking, cognitive activation (CA) strategies have been advanced and utilized in mathematics. CA develops when learners are challenged, confronted with conflicts, asked to think and explain clearly on their learning, and realize connections between new and previous content. Extending the theme to English language teaching (ELT), this study investigated Iranian English language teachers’ knowledge and practice of cognitive activation writing strategies (CAWS). In so doing, a model was proposed based on a questionnaire that was developed and validated in the present study. Through this scale, knowledge and practice of CAWS by 213 English as a foreign language (EFL) teachers were explored. During a pilot phase, the reliability of the questionnaire was calculated to be .78 for the knowledge section and .81 for the practice section. Two items in each section were removed after conducting exploratory factor analysis. Ultimately, the confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the proposed model was fit for the data. Five components were confirmed as constituents of CAWS for the knowledge section, and four components were identified for the practice section. The findings revealed that Iranian EFL teachers were already familiar with the CAWS and purportedly practiced them in their writing classes. Using the scale in the process of writing instruction can provide ELT practitioners with a helpful platform for relating to CA strategies and empowers learners to accomplish tasks such as problem-solving in their writing assignments, similar to what is practiced in mathematics.

Keywords

Subjects


Bai, B. (2015). The effects of strategy-based writing instruction in Singapore primary schools. System, 53(6), 96-106. doi:10.1016/j.system.2015.05.009
Bai, R. (Ed.). (2016). Writing strategies and strategy-based instruction in Singapore primary schools. Cambridge Scholars Publishing
Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Klusmann, U., Krauss, S., & Neubrand, M. (2013). Cognitive activation in the mathematics classroom and professional competence of teachers: A research program. Results from the COACTIV project. Springer.
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Burge, B., Lenkeit, J., & Sizmur, J. (2015). PISA in practice: Cognitive activation in maths. Slough: NFER.
Bukhari, S. F. (2016). Mind mapping techniques to enhance EFL writing skill. International Journal of Linguistics and Communication. 4(1), 58-77. doi: 10.15640/ijlc.v4n1a7
Cantley, I., Prendergast, M., & Schlindwein, F. (2017). Collaborative cognitive-activation strategies as an emancipatory force in promoting girls’ interest in and enjoyment of mathematics: A cross-national case study. International Journal of Educational Research, 81, 38-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2016.11.004
Csizér, K., Kormos, J., & Sarkadi, Á. (2010), The dynamics of language learning attitudes and motivation: lessons from an interview study of dyslexic language learners. Modern Language Journal, 94, 470-487. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2010.01054.x
Dean, P., Odendahl, N., Quinlan, T., Fowels, M., Welsh, C., & Bivens-Tatum, T. J. (2008). Cognitive models of writing: Writing proficiency as a complex integrated skill. Educational Testing Service.
De Silva, R., & Graham, S. (2015). The effects of strategy instruction on writing strategy use for students of different proficiency levels. System, 53(6), 47-59.
De Silva, R. (2015). Writing strategy instruction: Its impact on writing in a second language for academic purposes. Language Teaching Research, 19(3), 301-323.
De Smedt, F., Merchie, E., Barendse, M., Rosseel, Y., De Naeghel, J., & Van Keer, H. (2018). Cognitive and motivational challenges in writing: Studying the relation with writing performance across students’ gender and achievement level. Reading Research Quarterly, 53(2), 249-272. doi:10.1002/rrq.193
Depaepe, F., & König, J. (2018). General pedagogical knowledge, self-efficacy and instructional practice: Disentangling their relationship in pre-service teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education. 69, 177-190. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2017.10.003
Donné, N., Fraser, P., & Bousquet, G. (2016). Teaching strategies for instructional quality: insights from the TALIS-PISA Link Data, OECD Education Working Papers, No. 148, OECD Publishing, Paris. doi:10.1787/5jln1hlsr0lr-en
Dörnyei, Z., & Taguchi, T. (2010). Questionnaires in second language research (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Feng Teng, M., & Huang, J. (2019), Predictive effects of writing strategies for self‐regulated learning on secondary school learners’ EFL writing proficiency. TESOL Quarterly, 53, 232-247. doi:10.1002/tesq.462
Flower, L. S. & Hayes, J. R. (1977). Problem-solving strategies and the writing process. College English, 39(4), 449-461.
Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1980a). The cognition of discovery: Defining a rhetorical problem. College Composition and Communication, 31(1), 21-32.
Flower, L. S. & Hayes, J. R. (1980b). The dynamics of composing: Making plans and juggling constraints. In Gregg, L. & Steinberg, E. R. (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 31-50). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognition process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32, 365-387. doi: 10.2307/356600
Förtsch, C., Werner, S., von Kotzebue, L., & Neuhaus, B. J. (2017). The role of pedagogical content knowledge and cognitive activation for students’ learning. In ESERA (Hrsg.). Conference Book. (S. 67). Verfügbar unter: http://keynote.conference-services.net/resources/444/5233/pdf/ESERA2017_0107_paper.pdf
Fullan, M. & Langworthy, M. (2014). A rich seam: How new pedagogies find deep learning. Pearson.
Graham, S. (2006). Strategy instruction and the teaching of writing. In C. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 187-207). Guilford.
Harris, K. R., Graham, S., Mason, L., & Friedlander, B. (2008). Powerful writing strategies for all students. Paul H. Brookes.
Hayes, J. R. (2012). Modeling and remodeling writing. Written Communication. 29(3), 369-388. doi: 10.1177/0741088312451260
Hayes, J.R., & Berninger, V. (2014). Cognitive process in writing: A Framework. In B. Arfé, J. E. Dockrell, & V.W. Berninger (Eds.), Writing development in children with hearing loss, dyslexia or oral language problems: Implications for assessment and instruction (pp. 3-15). Oxford University Press.
Hu, G. (2005). Using peer review with Chinese ESL student writers. Language Teaching Research, 9(3), 321-342.
Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. The Guilford Press.
Kunter, M., Baumert, J., Blum, W., Klusmann, U., Krauss, S., & Neubrand, M. (Eds.) (2013). Cognitive activation in the mathematics classroom and professional competence of teachers. Springer.
Leki, I. (1995). Coping strategies of ESL students in writing tasks across the curriculum. TESOL Quarterly, 29(2), 235-260.
Li, F. & Wang, L, (2013). The study of comparison between English language and mathematical language. Journal of Studies in Social Sciences. 4(2), 213-234
Lipowsky, F., Rakoczy, K., Pauli, C., Drollinger-Vetter, B., Klieme, E., & Reusser, K. (2009). Quality of geometry instruction and its short-term impact on students’ understanding of the Pythagorean Theorem. Learning and Instruction, 19(6), 527-537. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.11.001
Lister, K., MacDonald, B., & Shumway, J. F. (2020). Experiencing active mathematics learning: Meeting the expectations for teaching and learning in mathematics classrooms. TME, 17(2&3), 615-640.
Mayer, R. E. (2003). The promise of educational psychology: Teaching for meaningful learning. Merrill.
OECD (2016), Ten questions for mathematics teachers ... and how PISA can help answer them, PISA, OECD publishing, Paris, http://dx.doi.or /10.1787/9789264265387-en
O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge University Press.
Ojima, M. (2006). Concept mapping as pre-task planning: A case study of three Japanese ESL writers. Journal of Science Direct System, 34, 566-585.
Ong, J., & Zhang, L. J. (2013). Effects of the manipulation of cognitive processes on EFL writers’ text quality. TESOL Quarterly, 47(2), 375-398.
Pallant, J. (2013). SPSS survival manual: a step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS. McGraw-Hill.
Pretz, J. E., Naples, A. J., & Sternberg, R. J. (2003). Recognizing, defining, and representing problems. In J. E. Davidson & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of problem solving (p. 3-30). Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511615771.002
Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-231.
Sasaki, M. (2000). Toward an empirical model of EFL writing processes: An exploratory study. Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(3), 259-291.
Sasaki, M., Mizumoto, A., & Murakami, A. (2018). Developmental trajectories in L2 writing strategy use: A self‐regulation perspective. Modern Language Journal, 102, 292-309. doi:10.1111/modl.12469
Silva, T., & Matsuda, P. (2002). Writing. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), An introduction to applied linguistics (pp. 252-266). Arnold.
Sturm, J. M., & Rankin-Erickson, J. L. (2002). Effects of hand-drawn and computer-generated concept mapping on the expository writing of middle school students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 17(2), 124-139. doi: 10.1111/1540-5826.00039
Suchman, L. A. (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge University Press.
Traga Philippakos, Z.A., MacArthur, C.A. & Munsell, S. (2018). College student writers’ use and modification of planning and evaluation strategies after a semester of instruction. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 62(3), 301-310. doi.org/10.1002/jaal.897
Wang, Y., & Chiew, V. (2010). On the cognitive process of human problem solving. Cognitive Systems Research. 11(1), 81-92. doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2008.08.003
Weinstein, C. E, & Hume, L. M. (1998). Study strategies for lifelong learning. American Psychology Association.