Communicative Moves in English Conceptual Review Article Abstracts: A Genre-based Corpus-driven Discourse Analytic Approach

Document Type : مقالات علمی پژوهشی

Authors
1 Assistant Professor, Department of English Language, Faculty of Humanities, Kosar University of Bojnord, Bojnord, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of English Language, Faculty of Letetrs and Humanities, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
Abstract
This study investigated rhetorical functions and their associated linguistic realizations in English review article abstracts. The analysis was based on a corpus of 100 English review article abstracts from linguistics and applied linguistics disciplines and followed a corpus-driven discourse analytic top-down approach. MAXQDA and WordSmith were used to code the moves and analyze their associated sub-corpora, respectively. The results of calculating range and frequency distributions showed that English conceptual review article abstracts use a rhetorical structure, different from that of research paper abstracts. This rhetorical organization is realized through a different set of moves, namely 1) establishing the territory or area of study, 2) identifying the problem, 3) introducing the present research, 4) organizing the paper, and 5) concluding or reflecting. Moreover, each move was realized through a distinct set of sub-moves. In terms of range, the moves dealing with purpose and structure were the most widely present moves; in terms of frequency distribution, the move dealing with structure was the most frequent. Furthermore, the highly frequent use of plural self-mentions indicates that in review article abstracts the emphasis is on research as a group activity inclusive of the researcher(s) and objects of study. In addition, the presence of ‘establishing the territory’, together with ‘identifying the problem’ can be seen as an attempt to sell the research. Finally, the prevalent use of the five moves showed that most review article abstracts are indicative-informative in function

Keywords

Subjects


References
Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analyzing genre: Language use in professional settings. Longman.
Callahan, J. L. (2010). Constructing a manuscript: Distinguishing integrative literature reviews and conceptual and theory articles. Human Resource Development Review, XX(X), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484310371492
Can, S., Karabacak, E., & Qin, J. (2016). Structure of moves in research article Abstracts in applied linguistics. Publications, 4(23), 1-6.https://doi.org/10.3390/publications4030023
Cross, C., & Oppenheim, C. (2006). A genre analysis of scientific abstracts. Journal of Documentation, 62(4), 428-446. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410610700953
Day, R. A. (1998). How to write and publish a scientific paper. Oryx Press.
Dochy, F. (2006). A guide for writing scholarly articles or reviews for the Educational Research Review. Educational Research Review, 4(1-2), 1-21.
Doró, K. (2013). The rhetoric structure of research article abstracts in English studies journals. Prague Journal of English Studies, 2(1), 119-139. https://doi.org/10.2478/pjes-2014-0013
Endres-Niggemeyer, B. (1998). Summarizing information: Including CD-Rom “SimSum”, simulation of summarizing, for Macintosh and Windows. Springer.
Gasparyan, A. Y. (2010). Thoughts on impact factors and editing of medical journals. Inflamm Allergy Drug Targets, 9, 2–5. https://doi.org/10.2174/187152810791292908
Gasparyan, A. Y., Ayvazyan, L., Blackmore, H., & Kitas, G. D. (2011). Writing a narrative biomedical review: considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors. Rheumatology International, 31, 1409-1417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-011-1999-3
Guimarães, C. A. (2006). Structured abstracts- Narrative review. Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira, 21(4), 263-268. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-86502006000400014
Gülpınar, Ö., & Güçlü, A. G. (2013). How to write a review article? Turkish Journal of Urology, 39(1), 44-48. https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2013.054
Hagger, M. S. (2012). What makes a ‘good’ review article? Some reflections and recommendations. Health Psychology Review, 6(2), 141-146. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2012.705556
Hartley, J. (1994). Three ways to improve the clarity of journal abstracts. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 64(1), 331-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1994.tb01106.x
Hartley, J. (2003). Improving the clarity of journal abstracts in psychology: The case for structure. Science Communication, 24(3), 366-379. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547002250301
Huckin, T. (2001). Abstracting from abstracts. In M. Hewings (Ed.), Academic writing in context: Implications and applications. Papers in honour of Tony Dudley- Evans (pp. 93-105). University of Birmingham Press.
Hwang, C., Nguyen, T., & Su, T. (2017). Move analysis for scientific abstract sections: a study of nanoscience and nanotechnology research article abstracts. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 15(1), 19-22.
Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. Longman.
Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. University of Michigan Press.
Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2005). Evaluative that constructions: signaling stance in research abstracts. Functions of Language, 12(1), 39-63. https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.12.1.03hyl
Hyon, S. (1996). Genre in three traditions: Implications for ESL. TESOL QUARTERLY, 30(4), 693-722. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587930
Jalilifar, A. R. (2011). Appraisal and thematic patterning in the centrality claim section of research articles. The Asian ESP Journal, 7(4), 100-122.
Jiang, K., & Hyland, K. (2017). Metadiscursive nouns: Interaction and cohesion in abstract moves. English for Specific Purposes, 46, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2016.11.001
Kaplan, R., Cantor, S., Hagstorm, C., Kamhi-Stein, L., & Zimmerman, C. (1994). On abstract writing. Text, 14(3),401-426. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1994.14.3.401
Lancaster, F. W. (2003). Indexing and abstracting in theory and practice (3rd ed.). Facet.
Lim, J. M. H. (2010). Commenting on research results in applied linguistics and education: A comparative genre-based investigation. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(4), 280-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2010.10.001
Lorés, R. (2004). On RA abstracts: From rhetorical structure to thematic organization. English for Specific Purposes, 23, 280-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2003.06.001
Martín-Martín, P. M. (2003). A genre analysis of English and Spanish research paper abstracts in experimental social sciences. English for Specific Purposes, 22(1), 25-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(01)00033-3
Mayer, P. (2009). Guidelines for writing a review article. Zurich-Basel Plant Science Center. http://www.plantscience.ethz.ch/education/Masters/courses/Scientific_Writing
Melander, B., Swales, J. M., & Fredrickson, K. M. (1997). Journal abstracts from three academic fields in the United States and Sweden: National or disciplinary proclivities? In A. Duszak (Ed.), Culture and styles of academic discourse (pp. 251-272). Mouton De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110821048.251
Moreno, A. I., & Swales, J. M. (2018). Strengthening move analysis methodology towards bridging the function-form gap. English for Specific Purposes, 50, 40-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2017.11.006
Mulrow, C. D., Thacker, S. B., & Pugh, J. A. (1988). A proposal for more informative abstracts of review articles. Annals of internal medicine, 108(4), 613-615. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-108-4-613.
Noguchi, J. (2006). The science review article – An opportune genre in the construction of science. Linguistic Insights, 17. Peter Lang.
Nwogu, K., & Bloor, T. 1991. Thematic progression in professional and popular medical texts. In E. Ventola (Ed.), Functional and systemic linguistics: Approaches and uses (pp. 369-384). Mouton de Gruyter.
Petticrew M., & Roberts H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Blackwell Publishing.
Pho, P. D. (2008). Research article abstracts in applied linguistics and educational technology: A study of linguistic realizations of a study of rhetorical structure and authorial stance. Discourse Studies, 10(2), 231-250. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1461445607087010
Ren, H., & Li, Y. (2011). A comparison study on the rhetorical moves of abstracts in published research articles and master’s foreign-language theses. English Language Teaching, 4, 162–166. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v4n1p162
Salager-Meyer, F. (1990). Discoursal flaws in medical English abstracts: a genre analysis per research- and text-type. Text, 10(4), 365-384. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1990.10.4.365
Samraj, B. (2005). An exploration of a genre set: Research article abstracts and introductions in two disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 24(2), 141-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2002.10.001
Santos, M. B. (1996). The textual organization of research paper abstracts in applied linguistics. Text, 16(4), 481-499. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1996.16.4.481
Scott, M. (2015). WordSmith Tools Manual. Version 6.0. Lexical Analysis Software Ltd.
Sidek, H. M., Mat Saad, N. S., Baharun, H., & Idris, M. M. (2016). An analysis of rhetorical moves in abstracts for conference proceedings. International E-Journal of Advances in Social Sciences (IJASOS), 2(4), 24-31. https://doi.org/10.18769/ijasos.80136
Suntara, W., & Usaha, S. (2013). Research articles abstracts in two related disciplines: Rhetorical variations between linguistics and applied linguistics. English Language Teaching, 6(2), 84-99. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n2p84
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2009). Abstracts and the writing of abstracts. University of Michigan Press.
Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2010). From text to task: Putting research on abstracts to work. In M. F. Ruiz-Garrido, J. C. Palmer-Silveira, & I. Fortanet Goméz (Eds.), English for professional and academic purposes (pp. 167-180). Rodopi.
Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2012). Academic writing for graduate students, 3rd edition: essential skills and tasks. University of Michigan Press.
Tankó, G. (2017). Literary research article abstracts: An analysis of rhetorical moves and their linguistic realizations. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 27, 42-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2017.04.003
Tibbo, H. (1993). Abstracting, information retrieval and the humanities: Providing access to historical literature. American Library Association.
Tognini-Bonelli, E. (2001). Corpus linguistics at work. John Benjamins.
Van Bonn, S., & Swales, J. M. (2007). English and French journal abstracts in the language sciences: Three exploratory studies. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6(2), 93-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2007.04.001
Ventola, E. (1994). Abstracts as an Object of Linguistic Study. In S. Cmejrkova, F. Danes, & E. Havlova (Eds.), Writing vs. speaking. language, text, discourse, communication (pp. 333-352). Gunter Narr.
Virgo, J. A. (1971). The review article: Its characteristics and problems. The Library Quarterly, 41(4), 275-291.
Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), xiii-xxiii.
Yang, J. (2009). The rhetorical moves in abstracts of published research articles by Chinese academic writers in the field of applied linguistics [Master’s thesis, Nanyang Technological University].
Yang, R., & Allison, D. (2003). Research articles in applied linguistics: Moving from results to conclusions. English for Specific Purposes, 22(4), 365-385. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(02)00026-1