The Relationship between Self-regulation Skill and Additional Language Learning among Iranian Monolinguals and Bilinguals

Document Type : مقالات علمی پژوهشی

Authors
M. Maghsoudi 1
A. Khomijani-Farahani 2
M. Jalali 3
1 Associate Professor of English Language Department, Farhangian University, Tehran, Iran
2 Associate Professor of Linguistics, Department of English language and Literature, the University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
3 Assistant Professor of TEFL, English Department, Farhangian University, Tehran, Iran
10.52547/LRR.13.1.14
Abstract
The contribution of bilingualism to L3 learning has been a controversial issue, as stated in the existing body of the related literature. Accordingly, the main purpose of this study was to investigate the possible differences between mono-lingual and bilingual learners of English in terms of its syntax with regard to their self-regulation strategy. In order to achieve the objectives of the study, 411 female and male participants from eight senior high schools in Arak were selected among Persian speaking learners and Persian-Turkish bilingual learners based on stratified sampling method A general English proficiency test, a self-regulation questionnaire and a syntactic structure test were administered to both groups to collect the required data. The results of one-way ANOVA, independent samples t-test revealed that monolingual and bilingual learners did not differ in learning syntactic structure. It was also indicated that there was a significant relationship between the subjects' self-regulation strategy and their general English proficiency. That is, the higher their levels of self- regulation strategy use, the higher their general English proficiency. According to the findings of the study, it is suggested that the high school teachers in Iran become familiar with self-regulation strategy and develop their teaching repertoire in terms of teaching techniques needed for developing self-regulation among their learners. In addition, in-service courses are required to help teachers learn and discuss the possible teaching techniques for developing EFL learners' self-regualtion strategy in high school EFL classes where bilingual or a mix of bilingual and monoloingual students are present.



Introduction

It is not simple to answer the question "Who is bilingual?" And "What is bilingualism? Although linguists have offered various definitions in this field, one of them cannot easily be considered a comprehensive and complete definition. Some researchers define bilingualism as a complex psychological, linguistic, and socio-cultural behavior that has a variety of dimensions (Blom et al., 2014). Others define bilingualism as the linguistic ability of bilinguals in two different languages, especially in the verbal dimension (Martin et al., 2016). Studies on bilingualism and its effect on new language learning have not provided a definitive answer to the question of whether there is a link between bilingualism and faster learning of a new language. Therefore, due to the contradictory results of different researches in this field, the present study has investigated the effect of bilingualism in learning a new language on male and female high school students in Arak.

The aim of the present study was to reduce the ambiguities about the effects of bilingualism on new language learning. Although half of Iranian people speak languages other than Persian, a few studies have been done on bilingualism and lots of questions have been unanswered. Therefore in this study the following hypotheses were formulated:

H1: Monolingual and bilingual students differ in the application of syntactic structures.

H2: There is a significant difference between students' self-regulatory learning skills and their language ability.



2. Literature Review

Bilingualism is a difficult concept to define, since many theories vary with respect to how much exposure a person needs to become native in a language. There is no general agreement among child language researchers about the 'normal' course of development among monolingual, nor among bilingual children. It is not possible to define the concept of complete acquisition, since it is difficult to define a person's control over a language. Researchers have found the following about the opportunity or threat of bilingualism in learning a new language: Kohnert (2010), Faiazi Barchini (2011) Golestani et al. (2016) and Barek and Bialy Stock (2011) mentioned that bilinguals not only suffer from academic retardation when learning a new language, but also show greater social maladaptation than monolinguals. Contrary to this view, many researchers have found that bilinguals are more careful and sensitive to learning a new language (foreign language), which helps them to learn more than one language (Vahedi & Jangi, 2016). In other words, they believe that bilinguals, as they experience the process of learning another language and are better equipped with general language learning strategies, their metacognitive awareness is increased. Therefore, they show better performance in learning the next language (Cenoz & Jessner, 2000; Ceylan & Harputlu, 2015; Tajalli & Satari, 2013). Thus, the benefits of bilingualism can be studied in relation to other areas of classroom learning, such as self-regulation as one of the most well-known mental performance functions. In other words, it can be seen whether bilingualism leads to higher mental executive functions, for example, higher self-regulation.




Methodology

Based on consensus among researchers regarding, the larger the size of the sample, the greater its precision or reliability, the present researchers invited 411 pre-university students both male and female with the age range of 16 to 19 at 8 schools from different areas of Arak (one of the industrial cities of Iran) to participate in present study. The investigators had to exclude 11 participants from this study because they were not involved in this range of age. The researcher elicited some demographic information about the participants through a background questionnaire in order to match them as closely as possible for SES to minimize the effect of social class. Accordingly the participants were classified as middle class. To achieve the objectives of the current study, some instruments as follows were used: a background questionnaire, general English proficiency test, the grammatical judgment test and a self-regulation questionnaire. In order to prevent any possible misunderstanding or confusion on the part of the participants and to ensure maximum understanding, the background questionnaire was developed in English along with its translation in Persian. After doing the sampling procedure and choosing subjects randomly 411 students were initially requested to participate in this study. Then testing was conducted in the respective schools by the investigators with the help of the school staff. The conditions for testing were strictly followed as far as possible.




Results

The results of independent t-test (t (227) = .65, p = .51> .05) showed that there was no significant difference between bilingual and monolingual students in the syntactic structure. The mean scores of bilingual and monolingual students in preposition stranding and pied piping were 3.06 and 3.14, respectively. The results of independent t-test (t (227) = .32, p = .79> .05) showed that bilingual and monolingual students performed the same. It was also shown that the mean score in self-regulation learning strategy of students with low language proficiency was39.26, with medium language proficiency was 43.68 and with high language proficiency was 44.50. The results of one-way ANOWA indicated that students' self-regulated learning strategies are significantly different based on their language proficiency (F(2,227) = 10.25, p = .00 < .05). Thus, it can be concluded that the self-regulation learning strategies of students have increased with increasing language proficiency.




Conclusion

To carry out this study, an ex post facto design was employed. A total of 411 male and female subjects at eight schools in Arak, Iran were randomly selected from among two groups of Turkish – Persian bilinguals and Persian monolinguals. General English proficiency test, a back ground, a self-regulated learning strategy questionnaire and a syntactic structure test were administered to both groups. Statistical analyses including ANOVA, t-test and descriptive statistics revealed that there was no significant difference between bilingual and monolingual students in the syntactic structure. It was also indicated that students' self-regulated learning strategies are significantly different based on their language proficiency.




Keywords

Subjects

بسطامی، حیدر، ابراهیمی قوام، صغری، شیخی، سعیدریا، داودی، محمد (1396). مقایسه عزت نفس، مهارتهای اجتماعی و خود کار آمدی تحصیلی بین کودکان دو زبانه و تک زبانه پایه ششم ابتدایی شهر ایلام. مطالعات روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی ، 22(14)، 164-151.
پورطاهریان، زبیده؛ خسروی، معصومه؛ محمدی فر، محمد علی (1393). نقش راهبردهای فراشناختی خواندن و عادت های مطالعه در انگیزش پیشرفت دانش آموزان دختر. روان شناسی مدرسه ، 1(15)، 36-22.
صلحی، مهناز، صالح فرد، اشرف، حسینی، آغا فاطمه و گنجی، مرسله (1394). بررسی رابطه راهبردهای خودتنظیمی و خلاقیت با عملکرد تحصیلی دانشجویان علوم پزشکی. ره آورد سلامت، 1(2)، 63-53.

طالب زاه نوبریان، محسن، ابولقاسمی، محمود، عشوری نژاد، فاطمه و موسوی، سید حسین (1390). بررسی روابط ساختاری خود پنداره، یادگیری خود تنظیمی و موفقیت تحصیلی دانشجویان. فصلنامه روش ها و مدل های روانشناختی. 1(4)، 72-59.
عیسی نژاد، امید و علیدادی، حسن (1397). رابطه ی خودتنظیمی یادگیری و راهبردهای فراشناختی خواندن با مشکلات یادگیری به زبان دوم در دانش آموزان دو زبانه (برازش مدل ساختاری). مجله روانشناسی و روان پزشکی شناخت، 5(5)،29-15.
فیاضی بارجینی، لیلا (1389). رابطه دوزبانگی و اختلال های گفتار وزبان. تعلیم و تربیت اسلامی، 102(3)، 67-62.
کدیور، پروین (1382). بررسی سهم باورهای خود کارامدی، خودگردانی، هوش و پیشرفت درسی دانش آموزان به منظور الگویی برای یادگیری بهینه. مجله علوم تربیتی و روان‌شناسی، 10(1)، 59-46.
گلستانی فرد، مونا، نیکو گفتار، منصوره و شمس اسفندآباد، حسن (1395). ﻣﻘﺎیﺴﻪ ﮐﺎرﮐﺮدﻫﺎی اﺟﺮایﯽ و ﺣﺎﻓﻈﻪ داﻧﺶ آﻣﻮزان دوزﺑﺎﻧﻪ و یﮏ زبانه. دو ﻓﺼﻠﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻋﻠﻤﯽ ـ ﭘﮋوﻫﺸﯽ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺖ اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﯽ، 5(1)، 67-52.

واحدی، شهرام و جنگی، هانیه (1394). تاثیر آموزش راهبرد خواندن ریاضی و راهبردهای فراشناختی بر حل مساله ریاضی دانش آموزان ابتدایی. تفکر و کودک، 6(1)، 129-113.
هادی، مریم (1395). بررسی رابطه سبک های مدیریت کلاس معلمان با خود تنظیمی و پیشرفت تحصیلی دانش آموزان. مطالعات مدیریت و کارآفرینی، 2(3)، 234-225.
Baker, C. (2011). Foundations of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 5th edition.
Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Barac, R, & Bialystok, E.(2011). Cognitive development of bilingual children. Language Teaching, 44 (1), 36-54.
Bardel, C. & Falk Y. (2007). The role of the second language in third language acquisition: the case of Germanic syntax. Second Language Research, 23(4), 459-484.
Bardel, C. and Falk, Y. (2010). The Study of the Role of the Background Languages in Third Language Acquisition. The State of the Art. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 48(2): 185-219.
Bhatia, T. and Ritchie, W. (2013). The Handbook of Bilingualism and Multilingualism. UK: Blackwell Publishing.
Blom, E, Kuntay, A. C, Messer, M, Verhagen, J, & Leseman, P. (2014). The benefits of being bilingual: Working memory in bilingual Turkish–Dutch children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 128(5), 105-119.
Bouffard, B. J. Vezeau, C. & Larouche, C. (1995). The impact of goal orientation on self-regulation and performanse among college student. British journal of educational psychology. 65(4), 317- 329.
Busari, A. O. (2013). Assessing the relationship of self-regulation, motivation and anxiety on mathematics achievement of elementary school children in south- western Nigeria, An international multidisciplinary journal Ethiopia, 7(3), 110-126.
Calvo, A, & Bialystok, E. (2014). Independent effects of bilingualism and socioeconomic status on language ability and executive functioning. Cognition, 13 (3), 278-288.
Cenoz, J., Jessner U. (2000). English in Europe: The Acquisition of a Third Language. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Ceylan, E, & Harputlu, L. (2015). Metacognition in reading comprehension. The Literacy Trek,1(1), 5-14.
Chaves-Barboza, E, Trujillo-Torres, J. M, & LopezNunez, J. A. (2015). Accomplishments in learning self-regulation in personal environments. Creative Education, 6(11), 1108-1120.
Cheng, E. C. K. (2011). The role of self-regulated learning in enhancing learning performance. The international journal of research and review, 2(4), 165-181.
Dugan, R. F. & Andrade, H. L. (2011). Exploring the construct validity of academic self-regulation using a new self-report questionnaire-the survey of academic self-regulation. The international journal of educational & psychological assessment, 7(1), 45-63
Foley, C. and Keegan, N. (2009). Pied-piping in embedded contexts in the acquisition of English: A qualitative study of comprehension. Online Proceedings of BUCLD, 33(7), 1-11.
Grosjean, F., & Li, P. (2013). Bilingualism: A short introduction. In F. Grosjean & P. Li (Eds.), The Psycholinguistics of Bilingualism (pp. 5–25). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Guglielmi, R.S. (2008). Native language proficiency, English literacy, academic achievement, and occupational attainment in limited-English-proficient students: A latent growth modeling perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 322-342.
Hernandez, M., Costa, A., & Humphreys, G. W. (2012). Escaping capture: Bilingualism modulates distraction from working memory. Cognition, 122(1), 37-50.
Hernandez, A., Ding, Li. & Brian, M. (2005). The emergence of competing modules in bilingualism. TESOL Quarterly, 14(4), 56-69.
Kohnert, K. (2010). Bilingual Children with Primary Language Impairment: Issues, Evidence and Implications for Clinical Actions. Journal of communication disorder, 43(6), 456-473.
Lawanto, O. and H. Santoso, (2013). Self-regulated learning strategies of engineering college students while learning electric circuit concepts with enhanced guided notes. International Educational Studies, 6(3): 88-104.
Lee, W., Lee, M. & Bang, M, (2014). Testing interest and self-efficacy as predicators of academic self-regulation and achievement. Contemporary educational psychology, 36 (2), 86-99.
Maghsoudi, M. (2012). Bilingualism: Advantage or disadvantage? Germany: Lap Lambert Academic Publish.
Mahmoodi, M. H, Kalantari, B, & Ghaslani, R. (2014). Self-regulated learning, motivation and language achievement of Iranian EFL learners. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98(2), 1062-1068.
Malmberg, J. (2014). Tracing the process of self-regulated learning students’ strategic activity in g/n Study learning environment. Faculty of Education Acta Univ. Oul. E., 142. 7-96.
Martin, C. D, Molnar, M, & Carreiras, M. (2016). The proactive bilingual brain: Using interlocutor identity to generate predictions for language processing. Scientific Reports, 6(2), 26-39.
Mayin Adeline VA. (2010). Cross-linguistic Influence in a Third Language: The case of Hmong-English bilingual learners of French. United States: UMI Dissertation Publishing.
Montrul, S. (2000). Transitivity Alternations in L2 Acquisition. Studies in Second
Language Acquisition, 22(5), 229-243.
Nayak, N., N. Hansen, N. Krueger & B. McLaughlin (1990). Language-learning strategies in monolingual and multilingual adults. Language Learning 40(5), 221–244.
Pei, L. (2014). Does metacognitive strategy instruction indeed improve Chinese EFL learners' reading comprehension performance and metacognitive awareness? Journal of Language Teaching & Research, 5(5), 1147.
Pour Mohammad, Z., Esmaeilpour, K. (2015). Effectiveness of self-regulation training on the Academic Achievement of mental students in Tabriz technical high school. Journal of Instruction and evaluation, 8(31), 93-102.
Radford, A. (2004). English Syntax: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rivers, W. P. and Golonka E. M. (2009). Third Language Acquisition Theory and Practice. The Handbook of Teaching. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
Rothman, J. (2015). Linguistic and cognitive motivations for the typological primacy model (TPM) of third language (L3) transfer: Timing of acquisition and proficiency considered. Bilingualism 18(2), 179- 190.
Samadi, F, and Maghsoudi, M. (2013). Bilingual versus Monolingual learners’ Reading Comprehension Ability Regarding their Interest in Reading Comprehension Topics. European online journal of natural and social sciences, 2(2), 23-34.
Tajalli, P, and Satari, S. (2013). Effectiveness of metacognitive strategies on reading skills of students with hearing disorders. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 84(5), 139-143.
Talebi, H. And Maghsoudi, M. (2007). Monolingual and bilingual English learners in one classroom: ‘Who is at a disadvantage?’ Asian EFL Journal, 7(6), 231-252.
Zare, M. and Davoudi, S. (2013). Effects of Bilingualism on L3 Vocabulary Learning Among Iranian EFL Learners. Journal of Language Studies, 13(1), 127-138.
Zhang, L, and Seepho, S. (2013). Metacognitive strategy use and academic reading achievement: Insights from a Chinese context. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 10(1), 54-69.
Yi Chung, L. (2015). Exploring the effectiveness of self-regulated learning in massive open online courses on non-native English speakers. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies (IJDET), 13(3), 61-73.
Language Related Research
Volume 13, Issue 1 - Serial Number 67
March and April 2022
Pages 425-458