L2 ASD Learners’ Scaffolding Development after Long Interaction with The Mobile Story-Sharing Application

نوع مقاله : مقاله تحقیق

نویسندگان
1 Student, English Language Education Department, Magister, Universitas Muhammadiyah Gresik, Gresik, Indonesia
2 Associate Professor, English Language Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Gresik, Indonesia
3 Assistant Professor, English Language Education, Magister, Universitas Muhammadiyah Gresik, Gresik, Indonesia
4 Professor, English Department, Faculty of Languages and Arts, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia
چکیده
Scaffolding research has been widely investigated involving parent-child within the first language (L1) context without considering the cognitive issues and Intelligence Quotients (IQ) aspects as crucial precursors of the scaffolding process. This case study aims to find emergent themes and theorize potential scaffolding theory from the interaction of two-second language (L2) Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) children and normal parents with minimum English exposure, cognitive disorders, and different IQ levels on the mobile story-sharing application. Participant observations and in-depth interviews on scaffolding using story-sharing activities among children, parents, and researchers were conducted every week for six months. Thematic analysis was implemented inductively and interpreted by two experts to find the emerging variation of scaffolding theories. The results showed that ASD learners' scaffolding process involved more complex stages than the previous studies. The complexities of scaffolding involved repetitive recall, translating, imitating, cooperating, target and crises. ASD learners could write a simple phrase and short sentence after exhaustive efforts. Since ASD learners’ previous vocabulary mastery was excluded, it is worth pursuing further researchers to examine learners’ vocabulary and story writing development using the same application.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


Al-Musawi, N. M. (2014). Strategic use of translation in learning English as a Foreign Language (EFL) among Bahrain University Students. Comprehensive Psychology, 3- 10. https://doi.org/10.2466/10.03.it.3.4
Aram, D., & Aviram, S. (2009). Mothers’ storybook reading and kindergartners' socioemotional and literacy development. Reading Psychology, 30(2), 175–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710802275348
Aram, D., & Shapira, R. (2012). Parent-Child Shared Book Reading and Children’s Language, Literacy, and Empathy Development. Rivista Italiana Di Educazione Familiare, 2(2), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1400/227336
Arifani, Y., Barianty, T. N., & Paulina. (2021). EFL learners’ cognition process: A case study of two ASD learners with different IQ levels. The Journal of ASIA TEFL, 18(2), 657–665.
Baiza, Y. (2018). Islamic Education and Development of Educational Traditions and Institutions. 77–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64683-1_7
Bates, C. C., Klein, A., Schubert, B., McGee, L., Anderson, N., Dorn, L., & McClure, E. (2017). E-Books and E-Book Apps: Considerations for Beginning Readers. Reading Teacher, 70(4), 401–411. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1543
Bernard-Opitz, V., Sriram, N., & Nakhoda-Sapuan, S. (2001). Enhancing social problem-solving in children with autism and normal children through CAI. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31(4), 377–398.
British Educational Research Association. (2011). Ethical guidelines for educational research. Bera.
Brown, C. A. (1998). The role of the L1 grammar in the L2 acquisition of segmental structure. Second Language Research, 14(2), 136–193. https://doi.org/10.1191/026765898669508401
Bruner, J. (1985). Child’s Talk: Learning to Use Language. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 1(1), 111–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/026565908500100113
Calis, E., & Dikilitas, K. (2012). The Use of Translation in EFL Classes as L2 Learning Practice. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 5079–5084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.389
Christ, T., Wang, X. C., & Erdemir, E. (2018). Young children’s buddy reading with multimodal app books: reading patterns and characteristics of readers, texts, and contexts. Early Child Development and Care, 188(8), 1012–1030. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2016.1241776
Daniels, H. (2016). Vygotsky and Pedagogy. Routledge.
Dawson, G. (2008). Early behavioral intervention, brain plasticity, and the prevention of autism spectrum disorder. Development and Psychopathology, 20(3), 775–803. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579408000370
Evans, B. (2013). How autism became autism: The radical transformation of a central concept of child development in Britain. History of the Human Sciences, 26(3), 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695113484320
Field, T., Nadel, J., Diego, M., Hernandez-Reif, M., Russo, K., Vchulek, D., Lendi, K., & Siddalingappa, V. (2010). Children with autism are more imitative with an imitative adult than with their parents. Early Child Development and Care, 180(4), 513–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430802090570
Flege, J. E., Frieda, E. M., & Nozawa, T. (1997). Amount of native-language (L1) use affects the pronunciation of an L2. Journal of Phonetics, 25(2), 169–186. https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1996.0040
Freeman, B. (2012). Using digital technologies to redress inequities for English language learners in the English speaking mathematics classroom. Computers and Education, 59(1), 50–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.11.003
Ge, X., & Land, S. M. (2003). Scaffolding students’ problem-solving processes in an Ill-structured task using question prompts and peer interactions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504515
Haman, E., Wodniecka, Z., Marecka, M., Szewczyk, J., Kacprzak, A., & Guasti, M. T. (2017). How Does L1 and L2 Exposure Impact L1 Performance in Bilingual Children ? Evidence from Polish-English Migrants to the United Kingdom. 8(September). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01444
Huang, Y. M., Liang, T. H., Su, Y. N., & Chen, N. S. (2012). Empowering personalized learning with an interactive e-book learning system for elementary school students. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(4), 703–722. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-012-9237-6
Hulme, C., Snowling, M. J., West, G., Lervåg, A., & Melby-Lervåg, M. (2020). Children’s language skills can be improved: Lessons from psychological science for educational policy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29(4), 372–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721420923684
Ingersoll, B., & Gergans, S. (2007). The effect of a parent-implemented imitation intervention on spontaneous imitation skills in young children with autism. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 28(2), 163–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2006.02.004
Joseph, R. M., Tager-flusberg, H., & Lord, C. (2002). Cognitive profiles and social-communicative functioning in children with autism spectrum disorder. 6, 807–821.
Kucirkova, N., Messer, D., Sheehy, K., & Flewitt, R. (2013). Sharing personalized stories on iPads: A close look at one parent-child interaction. Literacy, 47(3), 115–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12003
Kucirkova, N., Sheehy, K., & Messer, D. (2015). A Vygotskian perspective on parent-child talk during iPad story sharing. Journal of Research in Reading, 38(4), 428–441. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12030
Latif, A., & Binti, A. (2015). A study on English language anxiety among adult learners in Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM). Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2008, 223-232.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.198
Mermelshtine, R. (2017). Parent – child learning interactions : A review of the literature on scaffolding. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12147
Morahan, M. (2010). The use of students’ first language (L1) in the second language (L2) classroom. Retrieved July 20.
Nagata, N. (1998). The relative effectiveness of production and comprehension practice in second language acquisition. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 21(1), 153–177. https://doi.org/10.1076/call.11.2.153.5686
Neumann, M. M. (2020). Teacher scaffolding of preschoolers’ shared reading with a storybook app and a printed book. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 34(3), 367-384.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2019.1705447
Neumann, M. M., & Neumann, D. L. (2017). The use of touch-screen tablets at home and pre-school to foster emergent literacy. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 17(2), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798415619773
Newman, R. S. (2000). Social influences on the development of children's adaptive help seeking: The role of parents, teachers, and peers. Developmental review, 20(3), 350-404.
https://doi.org/10.1006/drev.1999.0502
O’Toole, K. J., & Kannass, K. N. (2018). Emergent literacy in print and electronic contexts: The influence of book type, narration source, and attention. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 173, 100–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2018.03.013
Reuter-Lorenz, P. A., & Park, D. C. (2014). How does it STAC up? Revisiting the scaffolding theory of aging and cognition. Neuropsychology Review, 24(3), 355–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-014-9270-9
Rezaei, M., & Jafari, M. (2014). Investigating the levels, types, and causes of writing anxiety among Iranian EFL students: A mixed method design. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1545–1554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.577
Richardson, K., & Norgate, S. H. (2014). Does IQ measure ability for complex cognition? Theory & Psychology, 24(6), 795–812. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354314551163
Rindal, U. (2010). Constructing identity with L2: Pronunciation and attitudes among Norwegian learners of English. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 14(2), 240–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2010.00442.x
Robinson, T., Pai, M., Liu, J., Vizeacoumar, F., Sun, T., Egan, S., Datti, A., Huang, J., & Zacksenhaus, E. (2015). High-throughput screen identifies disulfiram as a potential therapeutic for triple-negative breast cancer cells : Interaction with IQ motif-containing factors. Cell Cycle, February 2015, 37–41. https://doi.org/10.4161/cc.26063
Rogoff, B., & Gardner, W. P. (1984). Adult guidance of cognitive development. In B. Rogoff & J. Lave (Eds.), Everyday cognition: Its development in social context. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rule, P., & John, V. (2011). Your guide to case study research. Van Schaik, 1–148. www.vanschaiknet.com
Russo, C. F. (2004). A comparative study of creativity and cognitive problem-solving strategies of high-IQ and average students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48(3), 179–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620404800303
Schweisfurth, M. (2015). The state of VR: A meta-analysis of virtual reality tools in second language acquisition. International Journal of Educational Development, 40(2014), 259–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2014.10.011
Schwienhorst, K. (2010). The State of VR: A Meta-Analysis of Virtual Reality Tools in Second Language Acquisition. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(1), 221–239. https://doi.org/10.1076/call.15.3.221.8186
Sobel, D. M., Letourneau, S. M., Legare, C. H., & Callanan, M. (2021). Relations between parent-child interaction and children's engagement and learning at a museum exhibit about electric circuits. Developmental Science, 24(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.13057
Song, B. (2019). Exploring the cultural content in Chinese ELT textbooks from intercultural perspectives. Journal of Asia TEFL, 16(1), 267–278. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2019.16.1.17.267
Stone, C. A. (1998). Its Utility for the Field of. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31(4), 344–365. http://web.a.ebscohost.com.proxy.worc.ac.uk/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=3cc4fd83-3209-4134-9c8e-c85c64b81859@sessionmgr4005&vid=1&hid=4206
Tham, I., Chau, M. H., & Thang, S. M. (2020). Bilinguals’ processing of lexical cues in L1 and L2: an eye-tracking study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(7), 665–687. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1588329
Tubagus, M., Muslim, S., & Suriani, S. (2020). Development of Learning Management System-Based Blended Learning Model using Claroline in Higher Education. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 14(06), 186-194. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v14i06.13399
Uzawa, K. (1996). Second language learners' processes of L1 writing, L2 writing, and translation from L1 into L2. Journal of Second Language Writing, 5(3), 271–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(96)90005-3
van de Pol, J., Volman, M., Oort, F., & Beishuizen, J. (2015). The effects of scaffolding in the classroom: support contingency and student independent working time in relation to student achievement, task effort and appreciation of support. Instructional Science, 43(5), 615–641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-015-9351-z
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Havard University Press.
Wach, A. (2016). L1-based strategies in learning the grammar of L2 English and L3 Russian by Polish learners. System, 61, 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.08.001
Wang, X. L., Eberhard, D., Voron, M., & Bernas, R. (2016). Helping students with cognitive disabilities improve social writing skills through email modeling and scaffolding. Educational Studies, 42(3), 252–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2016.1160825
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). the Role of Tutoring in Problem Solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x
Yastıbaş, G. Ç., & Yastıbaş, A. E. (2015). The Effect of Peer Feedback on Writing Anxiety in Turkish EFL (English as a Foreign Language) Students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 530–538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.543