Abbott, A. (2001). Chaos of disciplines. University of Chicago Press.
Ahlstrom, D. (2017). How to publish in academic journals: Writing a strong and organized introduction section. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research, 4(2), 1-9.
Annesley, T. M. (2010). The Discussion section: Your closing argument. Clinical Chemistry 56(11), 1671-1674.
Baratta, A. M. (2010). Nominalization development across an undergraduate academic degree program. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(4), 1017-1036.
Barnes, C. (2017). The h-index debate: an introduction for librarians. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 43(6), 487-494.
Basturkmen, H. (2009). Commenting on results in published research articles and masters dissertations in Language Teaching. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 8(4), 241-251.
Bavdekar, S. B. (2015). Writing introduction: Laying the foundations of a research paper. Journal of the Association of Physicians of India, 63 (7):44-6.
Becher, T., & Trowler, P.R. (2001). Academic tribes and territories. Open University Press.
Biber, D. (2006). Stance in spoken and written university registers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5(2), 97-116.
Biber, D., & Gray, B. (2010). Challenging stereotypes about academic writing: Complexity, elaboration, explicitness. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(1), 2-20.
Biber, D., & Gray, B. (2016). Grammatical complexity in academic English: Linguistic change in writing. Cambridge University Press.
Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Reppen, R. (1998). Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use. Cambridge University Press.
Biber, D., Gray, B., & Poonpon, K. (2011). Should we use characteristics of conversation to measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development?. TESOL Quarterly, 45(1), 5-35.
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). The Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Longman.
Casal, J. E., Lu, X., Qiu, X., Wang, Y., & Zhang, G. (2021). Syntactic complexity across academic research article part-genres: A cross-disciplinary perspective. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 52, 100996.
Charles, M. (2003). ‘This mystery…’: a corpus-based study of the use of nouns to construct stance in theses from two contrasting disciplines. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2(4), 313-326.
Cho, D. W., & Lee, K. (2016). English relative clauses in science and engineering journal papers: A comparative corpus-based study for pedagogical purposes. Ampersand, 3, 61-70.
Covington, M. A., He, C., Brown, C., Naçi, L. & Brown, J. (2006). How complex is that sentence? A proposed revision of the Rosenberg and Abbeduto D-Level scale. CASPR Research Report 2006-01. The University of Georgia, Artificial Intelligence Center.
Cowan, R. (2008). The teacher’s grammar of English. Cambridge University Press.
Dahl, T. (2004). Textual metadiscourse in research articles: a marker of national culture or of academic discipline? Journal of Pragmatics, 36(10), 1807-1825.
Elliott, T. (2019). Variation in use of nouns as nominal premodifiers in advanced student writing across academic disciplines [Master’s thesis, Iowa State University].
Gardner, S., Nesi, H., & Biber, D. (2019). Discipline, level, genre: Integrating situational perspectives in a new MD analysis of university student writing. Applied Linguistics, 40(4), 646-674.
Gray, B. (2015). Linguistic variation in research articles. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1993). Some grammatical problems in scientific English. In M. A. K. Halliday, & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Writing science: Literacy and discursive power (pp. 76-94). The Falmer Press.
Hoey. M. (2005). Lexical priming: A new theory of words and language. Routledge.
Hong, A. L., Hua, T. K., & Mengyu, H. (2017). A Corpus-based Collocational Analysis of Noun Premodification Types in Academic Writing. 3L: Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 23(1), 115-131.
Hood, S. (2004). Appraising research: Taking a stance in academic writing. University of Technology, Sydney.
Hyland, K. (1998). Hedging in scientific research articles. John Benjamins Publishing.
Hyland, K. (1999). Academic attribution: Citation and the construction of disciplinary knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 20(3), 341-367.
Hyland, K. (2002). Genre: Language, context, and literacy. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 113-135.
Hyland, K. (2006). English for academic purposes: An advanced resource book. Routledge.
Hyland, K. (2008). As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes, 27(1), 4-21.
Hyland, K. (2010). Constructing proximity: Relating to readers in popular and professional science. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(2), 116-127.
Hyland, K. (2015). Genre, discipline and identity. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 19, 32-43.
Kanoksilapatham, B. (2015). Distinguishing textual features characterizing structural variation in research articles across three engineering sub-discipline corpora. English for Specific Purposes, 37, 74-86.
Krishnan, A. (2009). What are academic disciplines? Some observations on the disciplinarity vs. interdisciplinarity debate. National Centre for Research Methods.
Lan, G., Lucas, K., & Sun, Y. (2019). Does L2 writing proficiency influence noun phrase complexity? A case analysis of argumentative essays written by Chinese students in a first-year composition course. System, 85, 102116.
Lim, J. M. H. (2006). Method sections of management research articles: A pedagogically motivated qualitative study. English for Specific Purposes, 25(3), 282-309.
Lu, X., Casal, J. E., Liu, Y., Kisselev, O., & Yoon, J. (2021). The relationship between syntactic complexity and rhetorical move-steps in research article introductions: Variation among four social science and engineering disciplines. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 52, 101006.
Manning, C. D. (2015). Computational linguistics and deep learning. Computational Linguistics, 41(4), 701-707.
Martin, J. R. (2009). Genre and language learning: A social semiotic perspective. Linguistics and Education, 20(1), 10-21.
Martı́nez, I. A. (2003). Aspects of theme in the method and discussion sections of biology journal articles in English. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2(2), 103-123.
Mondal, H., Mondal, S., & Saha, K. (2019). What to Write in Each Segment of an Original Article?. Indian Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 6(3), 221-221.
Moreno, A. I., & Swales, J. M. (2018). Strengthening move analysis methodology towards bridging the function-form gap. English for Specific Purposes, 50, 40-63.
Parkinson, J. (2011). The Discussion section as argument: The language used to prove knowledge claims. English for Specific Purposes, 30(3), 164-175.
Parkinson, J., & Musgrave, J. (2014). Development of noun phrase complexity in the writing of English for Academic Purposes students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 14, 48-59.
Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. (2002). Longman dictionary of applied linguistics and language teaching. Longman.
Ruiying, Y., & Allison, D. (2003). Research articles in applied linguistics: Moving from results to conclusions. English for Specific Purposes, 22(4), 365-385.
Ruscio, J. (2016). Taking advantage of citation measures of scholarly impact: Hip Hip h Index! Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(6), 905-908.
Russell, D. R. (2002). Writing in the academic disciplines: A curricular history. SIU Press.
Samraj, B. (2004). Discourse features of the student-produced academic research paper: variations across disciplinary courses. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 3(1), 5-22.
Samraj, B. (2005). An exploration of a genre set: Research article abstracts and introductions in two disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 24(2), 141-156.
Staples, S., & Reppen, R. (2016). Understanding first-year L2 writing: A lexico-grammatical analysis across L1s, genres, and language ratings. Journal of Second Language Writing, 32, 17-35.
Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.
Tse, P., & Hyland, K. (2010). Claiming a territory: Relative clauses in journal descriptions. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(7), 1880-1889.
Yin, S., Gao, Y., & Lu, X. (2021). Syntactic complexity of research article part-genres: Differences between emerging and expert international publication writers. System, 97, 102427.
جستارهای زبانی