تاثیر تقویت تایپی درونداده، حاشیه نویسی، و پیش سازمان دهنده‌ها بر درک مطلب زبان آموزان ایرانی

• Abbasian, G. R., & Yekani, N. (2014). The role of textual vs. compound input enhancement in developing grammar ability. Issues in Language Teaching, 3(1), 134-11.
• Aghajani, A., & Rahimy, R. (2013). The impact of input enhancement type on Iranian EFL learners’ knowledge of english tenses across gender. Asian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(1), 153, 162.
• Alanen, R. (1995). Input enhancement and rule presentation in second language acquisition. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 259-299). University of Hawai'i Press.
• Anderson, N. J. (1991). Individual differences in strategy use in second language reading and testing. Modern Language Journal, 75(4), 460-472.
• Anderson, N. J. (2008). Active skills for reading: Book 3. Thomson Heinle.
• Anderson, R. C. (1978). Schema-directed processes in language comprehension. In A. M. Lesgold, J. W. Pellegrino, S. D. Fokkema, & R. Glaser (Eds.), Cognitive Psychology and Instruction (pp.67-82). Plenum.
• Anderson, R.C., & Pearson, P.D. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading. In P.D. Pearson, R. Barr, M.L. Kamil, & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research. Longman.
• Ayiewbey, S. (2013). An investigation to the effects of textual enhancement on the learning of english past tense in the context of Iranian learners. Technical Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 3(13), 1217-1222.
• Baddeley, A. (1976). The psychology of memory. Basic Books.
• Baddeley, A. (1997). Human memory: theory and practice. Psychology Press.
• Baddeley, A. (2000). Working memory: The interface between memory and cognition. In M. Gazzaniga (Ed.), Cognitive Neuroscience: A reader (pp. 292-304). Blackwell.
• Ben Salam, E., & Aust, R. (2007). The influence of feature-rich computerized glosses on reading comprehension and vocabulary acquisition. Proceeding of the Sixth IASTED International Conference on Web-Based Education. ISBN 978-0-889896-650-8/CD: 978-0-889896-651-5.
• Bowles, M. A. (2004). L2 glossing: To CALL or not CALL. Hispania, 87(3), 541-552.
• Burke, B.M. (2005). Experiential professional development: Promoting communicative language teaching with Expeditionary Learning Outward Bound design (Unpublisheddoctoral dissertation). The Pennsylvania State University.
• Burke, B.M. (2006). Theory meets practice: A case study of pre-service world language teachers in U.S. secondary schools. Foreign Language Annals, 39(1), 148-166.
• Cheng, Y., & Good, R. L. (2009). L1 glosses: Effects on EFL learners. Reading comprehension and vocabulary retention. Reading in a Foreign Language, 21(2), 119-142. ISSN 1539-0578
• Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (1998). Focus on form in second language acquisition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition (2nd Ed.). Oxford University Press.
• Fathi, J., & Shirazizadeh, M. (2018). The Effects of a Second Language Reading Strategy Instruction on Iranian EFL Learners’ Reading Comprehension and Reading Anxiety. Language Related Research, 11(4), 267-295.
• Fotos, S. (1998). Shifting the focus from forms to from in the EFL classroom. ELT journal, 52(4), 301-307.
• Davaei, R., & Talebinezhad, M. R. (2012). The effect of advance organizers on enhancing the reading comprehension of Iranian EFL learners. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(10), 2045-2052.
• Gorjian, B., Khoshakhlagh, S., & Bavizade, K. (2015). Using discourse structure-based graphic organizers in developing EFL learners’ reading comprehension. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World (IJLLALW), 8(4), 67-79.
• Goudarzi, Z. & Raouf Moini, M. (2012). The effect of input enhancement on collocations in reading on collocation learning and retention of EFL learners. International educational studies, 5(3), 247-258.
• Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. Cambridge University Press.
• Hale, J. B. (2003). The effect of two graphic organizers on learning performance and computer anxiety in a Web-enabled training lesson for navy enlistees (Unpublisheddoctoral dissertation). University of South Alabama.
• Hazrativand, P. (2012). The effect of typographical input enhancement on Iranian EFL learners' accuracy in oral production of narratives. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 1(4), 76-85.
• Izumi, S. (2002). Output, input enhancement, and the noticing hypothesis: An experimental study on ESL relativization, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(4), 541–77.
• Jacobs, G., & Farrell, T.S.C. (2003). Understanding and Implementing the CLT (Communicative Language Teaching). Paradigm. RELC Journal, 34(1), 5-30.
• Jourdenais, R., Ota, M., Stauffer, S., Boyson, B., & Doughty, C. (1995). Does textual enhancement promote noticing? A think aloud protocol analysis. In R. Schmidt (Ed.). Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 183-226). University of Hawaii Press.
• Ko, M. (2005). Glosses, comprehension, and strategy use. Reading in a Foreign Language, 17(2), 125-143.
• Krashen, S. D. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Pergamon.
• Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon.
• Krashen, S. D., & Terrell, T.D. (1983). The Natural Approach: Language Acquisition in the Classroom. Pergamon/Alemany.
• Lee, S. (2007). Effects of textual enhancement and topic familiarity on Korean EFL students’ reading comprehension and learning of passive form. Language Learning, 57(1), 87–118.
• Leow, R. P. (1993). To simplify or not to simplify. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15(3), 333–355.
• Leow, R. (1997). The effects of input enhancement and text length on adult L2 readers’ comprehension and intake in second language acquisition. Applied Language Learning, 8, 151-182.
• Leow, R. (2001). Do learners notice enhanced forms while interacting with the L2? An online and offline study of the role of written input enhancement in L2 reading. Hispania, 84(3), 496- 509.
• Littlewood, W. (1981). Communicative language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
• Lomicka, L. L. (1998). To gloss or not to gloss: An investigation of reading comprehension online. Language Learning & Technology, 1(2), 41-50.
• Long, M. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot, D. Coste, C. Kramsch, & R. Ginsberg (Eds.). Foreign language research in a cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39-52). John Benjamins.
• Nahavandi, N., & Mukundan, J. (2013). The impact of textual input enhancement and explicit rule presentation on Iranian elementary EFL learners’ intake of simple past tense. English Language Teaching, 6(1), 92-102.
• Overstreet, M. (1998). Text enhancement and content familiarity: The focus of learner attention. Spanish Applied Linguistics, 2, 229-258.
• Robinson, P. (1995). Attention, memory and the "noticing" hypothesis. Language Learning, 45,283-331.
• Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129-158.
• Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language Instruction (pp. 3-32). Cambridge University Press.
• Schmidt, R. (1993). Consciousness, learning and interlanguage pragmatics. InG. Kasper & S. Blum-Kulka (Eds.), Interlanguage pragmatics (pp. 21-42). Oxford University Press.
• Schmidt, R.W. (1994). Deconstructing consciousness in search of useful definitions for applied linguistics. AILA Review, 11, 11-26.
• Schmidt, R.W. (1995). Consciousness and foreign language learning: a tutorial on the role of attention and awareness in learning. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 1-64). Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
• Schmidt, R. (2010). Attention, awareness, and individual differences in language learning. In W. M. Chan, S. Chi, K. N. Cin, J. Istanto, M. Nagami, J. W. Sew, T. Suthiwan, & I. Walker, Proceedings of Classic 2010, Singapore, December 2-4 (pp. 721-737). Singapore: National University of Singapore, Centre for Language Studies.
• Simard, D. (2009). Differential effects of textual enhancement formats on intake. System, 37(1), 124-135.
• Simard, D., & Wong, W. (2004). Language awareness and its multiple possibilities for the L2 classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 37(1), 96-110.
• Sharwood Smith, M. (1981). Consciousness-raising and second language acquisition theory. Applied Linguistics, 2(2), 159-168.
• Sharwood Smith, M. (1991). Speaking to many minds: On the relevance of different types of language information for the L2 learner. Second Language Research, 7(2), 118-132.
• Sharwood Smith, M. (1993). Input enhancement in instructed SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15(2), 165-180.
• Suzuki, A. (2006). Differences in reading strategies employed by students constructing graphic organizers and students producing summaries in EFL. JALT Journal, 34(1), 416-431.
• Tajeddin, Z. (2013). Scaffolding comprehension and recall gaps: effects of paratextual advance organizers. Issues in Language Teaching, 2(1), 125-148.
• Taylor, A. (2006). The effects of CALL versus traditional L1 glosses on L2 reading comprehension. CALICO Journal, 23(2), 309-318.
• Tomlin, R., & Villa, V. (1994). Attention in cognitive science and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16(2), 183-203.
• VanPatten, B. (1994). Explicit instruction and input processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 25-41.
• VanPatten, B. (1996). Input processing and grammar instruction: Theory and research. Ablex Publishing Corporation.
• VanPatten, B. (2004). Input processing in second language acquisition. Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 5-31). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• White, J. (1998). Getting the learners’ attention: A typographical input enhancement study. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 85-113). Cambridge University Press.