Giles Goat-Boy, John Barth’s Confrontation with Positivist Sphinxes: A Symbolic Derision on the Language of Power

مقالات آماده انتشار

نوع مقاله : مقالات علمی پژوهشی

نویسندگان
Seyed Vahid Abtahi 1
Jalal Sokhanvar 2
1 English Department, the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Research and Science Branch, Tehran
2 Faculty of Letters and Humanities, Shahid Beheshti University
چکیده
Giles, Goat-Boy is a black comedy to bite everyone. Embodied in a postmodern fabulation, Barth’s sense of humor allows him to create a political allegory on any structure of power that claims to save humanity. GILES, a hybrid of a machine and a goat, is tasked with the mission to lead the so-called academic society through instrumental intellect. But he can only go so far as not to create a conflict of interest between the ruling powers. The pattern used in creating Giles is an imitation of the classic patterns in creation and journey of a hero, except that Giles is destined to appear as a scapegoat against the positivist Sphinx of Time. Such an approach begs the main question of the research: How ideological systems sacrifice their heroes to secure their interests? This hypothesis is also in line with Frankfurt School’s critical theory, which considers the capitalist system to be a violation of freedom and social values. The intellectuals such as Horkheimer and Adorno consider man to be a victim of objectification and alienation arising from social and political conflicts. They also believe that hegemonic systems have humiliated man with false pleasures. Just as Giles fails to reform the most powerful ruling system, WESCAC, so Barth symbolically paints a bleak picture of human destiny in modern society today. The purpose of the research is to raise human awareness about the harsh laws that are the ominous products of instrumental intellect, as one of the defining elements of capitalist system.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

Adorno, Theodor W. (1999). ‘47: Wiesengrund-Adorno to Benjamin, London 1936’, in Theodor W. Adorno and Walter Benjamin: The Complete Correspondence 1928–1940: Harvard University Press, pp. 127–34.
Barth, John (1966). Giles Goat-Boy. Anchor Books, an imprint of Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group.
---. (1988). Lost in the Funhouse. Anchor Books, an imprint of Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group.
Benjamin, Walter (1936). The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction. Random House.
Bryant, Jerry (1970). The Open Decision: The Contemporary American Novel and Its Intellectual Background. Free Press
Bullock, Alan and Trombley, Stephen [eds] (1999). The Fontana Dictionary of Modern Thought. Harper-Collins.
Campbell, Joseph (2008). The Hero with a Thousand Faces. New World Library.
Clavier, Berndt (2008). John Barth and Postmodernism: Spatiality, Travel, Montage. Peter Lang.
Clute, John (1979). ‘Giles Boat-Boy or, The Revised New Syllabus’, Survey of Science Fiction Literature. Edited by F.N. Magill, II, pp. 873–877.
Durkheim, Emile (2014). The Rules of Sociological Method: And Selected Texts on Sociology and Its Method. Simon and Schuster.
Enck, John (1965). ‘John Barth: An Interview’, Wisconsin Studies in Contemporary Literature, VI, pp. 3–14.
Frye, Northrop (2006). Anatomy of Criticism: Four Essays. Edited by R.D. Denham. University of Toronto Press.
Geuss, Raymond (1981). The Idea of a Critical Theory: Habermas and the Frankfurt School. Cambridge University Press.
Gioia, Ted (2014). Giles of the Goats: A Look Back at the Weirdest 1960s Novel of Them All, fractiousfiction.com.
Gresham, James T. (1974). ‘Giles Goat-Boy: Satyr, Satire, and Tragedy Twined’, Genre, 7(2), pp. 148–63.
Gross, Beverly (1968). ‘The Anti-Novels of John Barth’, Chicago Review, 20(3), pp. 95–109.
Held, David (1980). Introduction to Critical Theory: Horkheimer to Habermas. University of California Press.
Hendin, Josephine Gattuso (1978). Vulnerable People: A View of American Fiction Since 1945. Oxford University Press.
Horkheimer, Max and Adorno, Theodor W. (2002). Dialectic of Enlightenment. Edited by G. Noerr; Translated by E. Jephcott. Stanford University Press.
Karl, Frederick Robert (1983). American Fictions, 1940-1980: A Comprehensive History and Critical Evaluation. Harper & Row.
Kolakowski, Leszek (2007). Main Currents of Marxism: The Founders, the Golden Age, the Breakdown. W.W. Norton.
Machiavelli, Niccolo (2009). The Prince. Translated by Tim Parks. Penguin Classics
Marcuse, Herbert (2009). Negations: Essays in Critical Theory. Translated by J.J. Shapiro. MayFly Books.
---. (1966). Eros and civilization: a philosophical inquiry into Freud. Beacon Press.
Milton, John (2005). Paradise Lost. W.W.Norton & Company.
Prior, A. N. (1960). ‘The Autonomy of Ethics’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 38(3): 199–206.
Rasmussen, David M. [ed] (1996). ‘Critical Theory and Philosophy’, in Handbook of Critical Theory. Blackwell.
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques (1895). The Social Contract: Or Principles of Political Right. George Allen & Unwin.
Safra, Jacob E. [ed] (1988). ‘Consumerism,’ ‘Pyrrhon of Elis’, The New Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica Inc.
Scholes, Robert E. (1979). Fabulation and Metafiction. University of Illinois Press.
---. (1967). The Fabulators. Oxford University Press.
Schunk, Dale, (2019). Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective, Pearson.
Silverblatt, Michael, (2006). “John Barth.” episode 1, KCRW,kcrw.com/culture/shows/bookworm/john-barth
Somerset, FitzRoy James Henry (Lord Raglan), (2003). The Hero: A Study in Tradition, Myth and Drama. Dover Publications.
Steinke, Darcey [cont.] (1999). The Gospel According to John: Authorized King James Version. Grove Press
Sturken, Marita and Cartwright, Lisa, (2001). Practices of Looking: An Introduction to Visual Culture. Oxford University Press.
Swinden, Patrick (2014). Unofficial Selves: Character in the Novel from Dickens to the Present Day. Palgrave Macmillan.
Wacquant, Loic; Bottomore, Tom and Outhwaite, William, [eds] (1992). ‘Positivism’, The Blackwell Dictionary of Twentieth-Century Social Thought. Blackwell.
Waldmeir, Joseph J. [ed] (1980). Critical Essays on John Barth. G. K. Hall & Co.
Weber, Max (1994). Political Writings: Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought. Edited by Peter Lassman; Translated by Ronald Speirs. Cambridge University Press.
York, R.A. (2003). ‘Barth: Giles Goat Boy’, in The Extension of Life: Fiction and History in the American Novel. Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.
جستارهای زبانی

مقالات آماده انتشار، پذیرفته شده
انتشار آنلاین از 22 تیر 1404