Types and Functions of Speech Acts in Iranian EFL Teachers and Learners’ Classroom Interactions

مقالات آماده انتشار

نوع مقاله : مقالات علمی پژوهشی

نویسندگان
Mohammad Javad Mohammadi 1
Mehran Memari 2
Bita Asadi 3
1 Assistant professor, Department of English Language Teaching, Farhangian University, Tehran, Iran
2 English Department, Farhangian University, Ahvaz, Iran
3 Department of English, Malard Branch, Islamic Azad University, Malard, Iran
چکیده
Classroom interaction improves the learning process by enhancing opportunities for learning since both instructors and learners are involved in various speech acts. Speech act refers to a functional unit in the form of an act assisting individuals to perceive or promote things with words in interaction. Thus, the current study investigated classroom interaction in terms of types and functions of speech acts performed by Iranian English as a foreign language (EFL) teachers and learners. The data for the study came from audio-recording of twelve 90-minute sessions taught by six experienced Iranian teachers. To analyze the conversational data, Finocchiaro and Brumfit’s (1983) model was used to examine various types of speech acts and Walsh’s (2006) SETT was employed as a framework to explore the functions of speech acts. Following the data analysis, it was unfolded that directives were the most frequent speech acts, including suggestions, requests, warning, and giving instruction, accompanied by interpersonal and personal ones. As to the functions of speech acts, the most frequent mode was the materials mode (42%), followed by skills and systems mode (34%), classroom context mode (16%), and managerial mode (8%). The overall findings indicate the central role of the teacher in teacher-fronted classes in Iran as the most speech acts, i.e. about 79%, were performed by teachers in the form of requestive, suggestive, and advisory to control and promote the learning process. By carrying out the current study, it is hoped that readers gain more insight regarding the pragmatics territory, most notably speech acts.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

Austin, J.L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Bachman, L. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Basra, S. M. & Thoyyibah, L. (2017). A speech act analysis of teacher talk in an EFL classroom. International Journal of Education, 10(1), 73-81.
Beltrán-Planques, V., & Querol-Julián. M. (2018). English Language Learners’ Spoken Interaction: What a Multimodal Perspective Reveals about Pragmatic Competence. System, 77, 80-90.
Billmyer, K. (1990). I really like your lifestyle: ESL learners learning how to compliment. Penn Working Papers in Educational Linguistics, 6(2), 31-48.
Bowe, H. J., & Martin, K. (2007). Communication across cultures: mutual understanding in a global world. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Brouwer, C.E., & Wagner, J., (2004). Developmental issues in second language conversation. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 29-47.
Brown, H. (2001).Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. New York: Longman.
Bygate, M. (1988). Speaking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1-47.
Chalak, A. (2021). Power Dominance and Interaction Features in Iranian EFL Teachers’ Classroom Discourse. Language Related Research, 12(5), 385-404.
Christianto, D. (2020). Speech acts in EFL classrooms. Journal of Pragmatics Research, 2(1), 68-79.
Cohen L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. London: Routledge-Falmer.
Crewswell, J. W. (2009). Research design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Derakhshan, A., & Shakki, F. (2021). A meta-analytic study of instructed second language pragmatics: A case of the speech act of request. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 12(1), 15-32.
Eslami-Rasekh, Z., Eslami-Rasekh, A., & Fatahi, A. (2004). The effect of explicit metapragmatic instruction on the speech act awareness of advanced EFL students. TESL EJ, 8(20), 1-12.
Finocchiaro, M., & Christopher, B. (1983). The functional-notional approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Firth, A., (2009). Doing not being a foreign language learner: English as a lingua franca in the
workplace and (some) implications for SLA. International Review of Applied Linguistics
in Language Teaching, 47(1), 127-156.
Firth, A., & Wagner, J. (1997). On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research. The Modern Language Journal, 81(3), 285–300.
Garton, S. (2012). Speaking out of turn? Taking the initiative in teacher-fronted classroom interaction. Classroom Discourse, 3(1), 29-45.
Hadley, A. (2001). Teaching language in context. Boston: Heinle and Heinle.
Hashemian, M. (2021). A cross-cultural study of refusal speech act by Persian L2 learners and American native speakers. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 12(1), 81-98.
Jakob, J. C. (2018). Speech acts in EFL classroom at Islamic senior high school (MAN) 1Sinjai. Journal of Language and Literature, 18(1), 20-27.
Jalilifar, A. (2009). Request strategies: Cross-sectional study of Iranian EFL learners and Australian native speakers. English Language Teaching, 2(1), 46-61.
Kasper, G. (2009). Locating cognition in second language interaction and learning: inside the skull or in public view? International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 47(1), 11-36.
Khodamoradi, A., Talebi, S.H., & Maghsoudi, M. (2020). The Relationship between Teacher Personality and Teacher Interpersonal Behavior: The Case of Iranian Teacher Educators. Applied research on English language, 9(3), 325-348.
Klattenberg, R. (2022). Conversation Analysis and Classroom Management: An Investigation into L2 teachers' interrogative reproaches. Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler.
Lam, D. (2019). Interactional Competence with and without Extended Planning Time in a Group Oral Assessment. Language Assessment Quarterly, 16(1), 1-20.
Long, M. H. (1983). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 126-141.
May, L., Nakatsuhara, F., Lam, D. (2020). Developing tools for learning oriented assessment of interactional competence: Bridging theory and practice. Language Testing, 37(2), 165-188.
Merdana, Seken, K., & Putra, N. A. J. (2013). An analysis of speech acts produced by elementary school teachers and students to facilitate teaching and learning at SDN Pringgasela East Lombok. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Indonesia, 1(43), 1-11.
Mimouni, A. (2022). Using Mobile gamified quizzing for active learning: The effect of reflective class feedback on undergraduates’ achievement. Education and Information Technology, 27(4), 1-24.
Mori, J., & Hasegawa, A. (2009). Doing being a foreign language learner in a classroom: embodiment of cognitive states as social events. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 47(1), 65-94.
Peker, H., & Arsalan, Z. (2020). A Critique of Merrill Swain’s Output Hypothesis in Language Learning and Teaching. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 16(1), 99-108.
Peng, J. (2019). The roles of multimodal pedagogic effects and classroom environment in willingness to communicate in English. System 82, 161-173.
Searle, J. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press, London.
Shahani, S., & Chalak, A. (2017). Classroom discourse analysis as a tool for reflective practice: Focus on form approach. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Language, Discourse and Pragmatics, 84-89.
Sun, J.C., & Hsiu, L. (2022). Effects of integrating an interactive response system into flipped classroom instruction on students’ anti-phishing self-efficacy, collective efficacy, and sequential behavioral patterns. Computers and Education, 180(3), 104430.
Tajeddin, Z., & Ghanbar, H. (2016). Discoursal Structure of Class Opening and Closing in EFL Teachers' Talk: A Conversational Analytic Perspective. Teaching English Language, 10(1), 87-108.
Thomas, J. (2006). Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 91-122.
Van Ek, J. A. (1980). Threshold Level English. Oxford: Pergamon Press
Vanderveken, D. (2009). Meaning and Speech Acts: Volume 1, Principles of Language Use. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Walsh, S. (2006). Investigating Classroom Discourse. London: Routledge.
Walsh, S. (2011). Exploring Classroom Discourse: Language in Action, London: Routledge.
Walsh S (2012) Conceptualizing classroom interactional competence. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language), 6(1), 1-14.
Wilkins, D. A. (1972). The linguistic and situational content of the common core in a unit/credit system. Ms. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
Yang, S., & Walsh, S. (2014). Classroom discourse in K.P. Schneider & Barron, B. (Eds.), Pragmatics of Discourse (463-490), Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
Zayed, N. M. (2014). Jordanian EFL Teachers ’ and Students ’ Practice of Speech Acts in the Classroom. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature , 2(5), 1-10.
جستارهای زبانی

مقالات آماده انتشار، پذیرفته شده
انتشار آنلاین از 22 تیر 1404